Climate Litigation and Judicial Activism in Environmental Protection

نوع مقاله : Special issue on "Climate Change and Effects on Water and Soil"

نویسندگان

1 Al-Turath University, Baghdad 10013, Iraq

2 Al-Mansour University College, Baghdad 10067, Iraq

3 Al-Mamoon University College, Baghdad 10067, Iraq

4 Al-Rafidain University College Baghdad 10064, Iraq

5 Madenat Alelem University College, Baghdad 10006, Iraq

6 مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کردستان

چکیده

Climate litigation and judicial activism have become key instruments to tackle the climate crisis due to the lack of appropriate legislative or executive action. The study examines judicial activism through the lens of constitutional- and rights-related cases and its implications for some aspects of climate policies and environmental protection. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze ‘litigation cases’ from a variety of jurisdictions from 2010 to 2023. Judicial opinions were subjected to qualitative content analysis, and quantitative models estimated the relationship between judicial activism and emissions reductions. Data sources include judicial rulings, international agreements and interviews with legal experts. North America has the highest absolute number of cases, as well as the largest share of cases in which any of these treaties are invoked that also mention corporate defendants. Next comes Europe a region of heavy relative dependence on constitutional claims and arguments rooted in human rights. In South America and Africa there are many more recent cases involving indigenous claims and other human rights claims, perhaps suggesting increasing awareness about the climate impacts on vulnerable communities. Courts are bridging gaps in legislative and executive action and shaping policy and setting legal precedents as courts take a more prominent role in the global climate governance efforts over climate change.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

مراجع

References
Adana Ahmed, Y., Kadhim, K. , Mezian, A. M. H. , Odah Hussan, A. Sabah, A., & Kazemi, S. (2025). Legal Frameworks Governing Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Preservation. Environment and Water Engineering,  doi: 10.22034/ewe.2025.526959.2027
Babeck, W. (2021). How constitutional courts navigate climate litigation. Iustitia. doi: 10.59172/2667-9876/2023-1/19-27
Burgers, L. (2020). Should judges make climate change law? Transnational Environmental Law, 9(1), 55–75.
Chaturvedi, E. (2021). Climate change litigation: Indian perspective. German Law Journal, 22(8), 1459–1470. doi: 10.1017/glj.2021.85
Esmaeili, S. , Bahrami, J. and Kamali, B. (2024). The contributions of natural and anthropogenic climate change on water resources reduction in Zarrinehroud basin of Lake Urmia. Advances in Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, 1(1), 1-14. doi: 10.22034/acees.2024.195339
Ferguson, E. C. (2024). Held v. State of Montana: A constitutional rights turn in climate change litigation? Journal of Environmental Law. (Advance online publication).
Flammer, C., Toffel, M. W., & Viswanathan, K. (2019). Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks. Harvard Business School Working Papers.
Harnowo, T., & Habib, F. H. (2023). The Use of Administrative Court for Climate Change Litigation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1270.
Law, U. (2023). Global Climate Litigation Report: 2023 Status Review. United Nations Environment Programme Law and Environment Programme. doi:https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-climate-litigation-report-2023-status-review
Lees, E., & Gjaldbæk-Sverdrup, E. (2024). Fuzzy Universality in Climate Change Litigation. Transnational Environmental Law. 13(3):502-521. doi:10.1017/S2047102524000141
Masyitoh, A. (2021). Role Of Judicial Activism In Environmentaldispute Resolution Before The State Administrative Court. Prophetic Law Review, 3(1), 1–15. doi: 10.20885/PLR.vol3.iss1.art1
 Mazzotti, P. (2023). The necessity defence in (the Swiss) climate protest cases: Democratic contestation in the age of climate activism. European Law Journal, 29(3-6), 393-421. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12497
 Moreira, D. d. A., Nina, A. L. B., Garrido, C. d. F., & Neves, M. E. S. B. (2023). Rights-Based climate litigation in Brazil: An assessment of constitutional cases before the Brazilian supreme court. Journal of Human Rights Practice.
Nedevska, J. (2021). An Attack on the Separation of Powers? Strategic Climate Litigation in the Eyes of U.S. Judges. Sustainability. 13(15), 8335; doi: 10.3390/su13158335
Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. (2017). A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 2018;7(1):37-67. doi:10.1017/S2047102517000292
Preston, B. J. (2018). The Evolving Role of Environmental Rights in Climate Change Litigation. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law. 2 (2018) 131–164
Robinson, S. A., & Carlson, D. A. (2021). A just alternative to litigation: applying restorative justice to climate-related loss and damage. Third World Quarterly, 42, 1384 - 1395. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2021.1877128
Rott, P. (2023). Money Makes The World Go Hot – Climate Litigation Against Banks? European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance.
Setzer, J., & Benjamin, L. (2019). Climate Litigation in the Global South: Constraints and Innovations. Transnational Environmental Law, 9, 77 - 101.
Setzer, J., & Winter de Carvalho, D. (2021). Climate litigation to protect the Brazilian Amazon: Establishing a constitutional right to a stable climate. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law.
Steinkamp, T. (2023). Intergenerational Justice as a Lever to Impact Climate Policies: Lessons from the Complainants’ Perspective on Germany’s 2021 Climate Constitutional Ruling. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14, 731 - 746.
Sulyok, K. (2024). Transforming the Rule of Law in Environmental and Climate Litigation: Prohibiting the Arbitrary Treatment of Future Generations. Transnational Environmental Law.
Zenteno Villa, L. (2024). Exploring Institutional Barriers to Effective Human Rights-Based Climate Litigation in Latin American Courts—Lessons from Chile and Ecuador. Journal of Human Rights Practice. Vol. 16(1), Pages 258–272, doi:10.1093/jhuman/huad073
 

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 25 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 31 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 01 تیر 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار