The effect of alfalfa cover on runoff generation at the scale of erosive plots using a rainfall simulation

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Nature Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Natural Engineering Department, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Nature Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Vegetation is a universal and effective method for water and soil conservation. The significant implications of soil loss necessitate the adoption of appropriate soil conservation practices and soil management solutions according to the regional climate. Investigation of the effects of soil cover on the soil erosion process can provide the information necessary for the success of soil and water conservation practices. In general, vegetation cover can mitigate runoff by increasing water infiltration, enhancing sediment trapping, reducing the kinetic energy of raindrop impact, increasing surface roughness, decreasing flow velocity, and controlling runoff hydraulic properties. The impact of vegetation cover on runoff generation has been studied at different spatial scales, from experimental to watershed scales, and most studies have shown the effectiveness of vegetation cover in reducing surface runoff. In arid regions, it may be difficult and economically infeasible to cover the entire surface area of a soil conservation project with vegetation. Therefore, the question arises as to how much of the soil surface should be covered to have an optimal impact on runoff generation. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different ratios of alfalfa coverage on runoff generation under simulated rainfall conditions.
 
Materials and methods
A completely randomized design was used with treatments based on the ratio of alfalfa coverage (0, 35, 65, and 90 %) under artificial rainfall conditions. The texture of the studied soil was sandy loam and collected from the surface horizon of farmlands in Kashan. All experimental plots were 2 m long, 0.55 m wide, and 0.35 meters deep with a metal runoff collector. Alfalfa seeds were planted at a spacing of 15×15 cm in the 35 % plot, 10×10 cm in the 65 % plot, and five in 10 cm in the 90 % plot. All plots were subjected to a simulated rainfall with an intensity of 90 mm hr-1 for 70 min. To achieve uniform antecedent moisture conditions, all plots were subjected to a 10-minute long simulated rainfall at an intensity of 90mm h-1 exactly one hour before the experiment.
During the experiment, the runoff and sediment samples were gathered using the metal collector (placed at the plot outlet) at 5-minute intervals. In order to investigate the changes in runoff reduction efficiency in different treatments and different testing periods, statistical criteria of runoff reduction efficiency were used. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov, one-way ANOVA, and Duncan’s tests were used for data analysis.
 
Results and Discussion
The results indicated that the plant cover treatments were most effective in reducing runoff during the first 15 minutes of the experiments. However, their effectiveness decreased as the experiments progressed due to the soil's inability to pass water at a higher rate once the infiltration reached its final rate. The coverage ratio treatments (0, 35, 65, and 90 %) showed a significant difference in runoff generation (p <0.01). The bare plots had the highest average runoff generation and were classified into a separate group (a). The plots with 35, 65, and 90 % coverage ratios had average runoff rates of 0.329 mm min-1, 0.222 mm min-1, and 0.112 mm min-1, respectively, and were placed in separate groups as well. In the bare soil treatments, the high amount of rainfall drops on the soil surface without vegetation interception exceeded the infiltration rate and subsequently produced runoff. Additionally, soil sealing and crusting processes due to raindrop impacts could reduce infiltration and generate higher runoff. The effectiveness of runoff reduction was also evaluated at 35, 65, and 90 % alfalfa cover. The results showed that 65 and 90 % cover significantly reduced runoff production, but no significant difference was observed between the 35 and 65 % levels.
 
Conclusion
In this study, we evaluated the influence of alfalfa coverage ratios on runoff generation in experimental conditions subjected to artificial rainfall. We found that higher coverage of alfalfa was associated with a delay and reduction in runoff generation. While all the examined vegetation cover percentages demonstrated an acceptable performance in reducing runoff and sediment. Furthermore, we were able to determine a practical threshold for coverage ratio, which could result in a significant decrease in surface runoff production. We found that a minimum of 65% alfalfa coverage was necessary to achieve this reduction. This threshold could be considered a beneficial criterion for soil and water conservation practices, especially in arid areas where dense vegetation establishment can be difficult and more expensive. This study is also particularly important for dry and semi-arid regions that face challenges of drought and soil erosion. The use of alfalfa as a vegetative cover can help to conserve soil moisture, reduce erosion, and improve water quality in these areas. In addition, vegetation plays a crucial role in soil and water conservation, and alfalfa, being a perennial plant with a deep root system, is a suitable option for erosion and runoff control in various regions, especially in dry and semi-arid areas.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Azartaj, E., Rasoulzadeh, A., & Asghari, A. (2018). Investigation of land use change effect on runoff and soil erosion using rainfall simulation in Heiran area, Ardabil, Watershed Engineering and Management, 10(1), 1-13. doi:10.22092/ijwmse.2018.115656. [In Persian]
Casermeiro, M.A., Molina, J.A., Delacruz Caravaca, M.T., Hernando Massanet, M.I., & Moreno, P.S. (2004). Influence of scrubs on runoff and sediment loss in soils of Mediterranean climate, Catena, 7, 97-107. doi:10.1016/s0341 8162(03)00160-7
Duan, J., Liu, Y.J., Wang, L.Y., Yang, J., Tang, C.J., & Zheng, H.J. (2022). Importance of grass stolons in mitigating runoff and sediment yield under simulated rainstorms. Catena213, 106132. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106132
Dunjo, G., Pardini, G., & Gispert, M. (2004). The role of land use–land cover on runoff generation and sediment yield at a microplot scale. Journal of Arid Environment, 57, 99–116. doi:10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00097-1
Dunkerley, D. (2021). The importance of incorporating rain intensity profiles in rainfall simulation studies of infiltration, runoff production, soil erosion, and related land surface processes. Journal of Hydrology603, 126834. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126834
Gao, Y., Zhu, B., Zhou, P., Tang, J.L., Wang, T., & Miao, C.Y. (2009). Effects of vegetation cover on phosphorus loss from a hillslope cropland of purple soil under simulated rainfall: a case study in China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems85, 263-273. doi:10.1007/s10705-009-9265-8
Hatefi, M., Sadeghi, H.R., Erfanzadeh, R. & Behzadfar, M. (2020). Laboratory investigation of the role of vegetation in the production of runoff in small plots under the freeze-thaw cycle. Journal of Water and Soil, 34(4), 764-755. doi: 10.22067/JSW.V34I4.76389. [In Persian]
Hou, G., Bi, H., Huo, Y., Wei, X., Zhu, Y., Wang, X., & Liao, W. (2020). Determining the optimal vegetation coverage for controlling soil erosion in Cynodon dactylon grassland in North China. Journal of Cleaner Production244, 118771. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118771
Kamphorst, A. (1987). A small rainfall simulator for the determination of soil erodibility. Agriculture Science, 35, 407-415. doi:10.18174/njas.v35i3.16735
Kavianpour, A.M., Jafarian, Z., Ismaili, A., & Kavian, A. (2015). The effect of vegetation cover on reducing runoff and soil loss using a rain simulator in uncultivated pastures of Mazandaran province. Geography and Environmental Planning, 26(58(2)), 179-190. doi: 20.1001.1.20085362.1394.26.2.12.3. [In Persian]
Kervroëdan, L., Armand, R., Saunier, M., & Faucon, M. P. (2019). Effects of plant traits and their divergence on runoff and sediment retention in herbaceous vegetation. Plant and Soil441, 511-524. doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04142-6
Kim, J.K., Onda, Y., Kim, M.S., & Yang, D.Y. (2014). Plot-scale study of surface runoff on well-covered forest floors under different canopy species. Quaternary International344, 75-85. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2014.07.036
Kuras, P.K., Alila, Y., & Weiler, M. (2012). Forest harvesting effects on the magnitude and frequency of peak flows can increase with return period. Water Resources Research48(1). doi:10.1029/2011WR010705
Marques, M.J., Bienes, R., Jiménez, L., & Pérez-Rodríguez, R. (2007). Effect of vegetal cover on runoff and soil erosion under light intensity events. Rainfall simulation over USLE plots. Science of the Total Environment378(1-2), 161-165. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.043
Mingguo, Z., Qiangguo, C., & Hao, C. (2007). Effect of vegetation on runoff-sediment yield relationship at different spatial scales in hilly areas of the Loess Plateau, North China. Acta Ecologica Sinica27(9), 3572-3581.doi:10.1016/S1872-2032(07) 60075-4
Morgan, R.P. (2007). Vegetative-based technologies for erosion control. In Eco-and Ground Bio-Engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Eco-Engineering 13–17 September 2004 (pp. 265-272). doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5593-5_26
Negi, G.C.S., Joshi, V., & Kumar, K. (1998). Spring sanctuary development to meet household water demand in the mountaiCns: a call for action. Research for Mountain Development: Some Initiatives and Accomplishments. Gyanodya Prakashan, Nainital, India, 25-48.
Nie, J., Dai, P., & Sobel, A.H. (2020). Dry and moist dynamics shape regional patterns of extreme precipitation sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(16), 8757-8763. doi:10.1073/pnas.1913584117
Noor, H., Arabkhedri, M., & Dastranj, A. (2023). Evaluation of the effect of range exclosure on soil erosion at plots scale (Case study: Sanganeh Soil Conservation Research Site). Water and Soil Management and Modelling, 3(2), 66-77. doi:10.22098/mmws.2022.11286.1116. [In Persian]
Pan, C., & Shangguan, Z. (2006). Runoff hydraulic characteristics and sediment generation in sloped grassplots under simulated rainfall conditions. Journal of Hydrology331(1-2), 178-185. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.011
Pan, C., Ma, L., & Shangguan, Z. (2010). Effectiveness of grass strips in trapping suspended sediments from runoff. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms35(9), doi:1006-1013. doi:10.1002/esp.1997
Perez-Latorre, F.J., de Castro, L., & Delgado, A. (2010). A comparison of two variable intensity rainfall simulators for runoff studies. Soil and Tillage Research107(1), 11-16. doi:10.1016/j.still.2009.12.009
Rahmani Nenekaran, F., Esmaeli Ouri, A., Hazbavi, Z., Kalehhouei, M., Ahmadi, M., & Mostafazadeh, R. (2021). Simulation of the effect of vegetation type on hydrological response at the scale of a field plot. The 10th International Conference on Rain Catchment Surface Systems, Kordestan, Iran, Pp. 1-7. [In Persian]
Rahmani Nenehkaran, F., Esmaeli Ouri, A., Kalehhouei, M., Ahmadi, M., Mostafazadeh, R., & Hazbavi, Z. (2022). The changeability of runoff and sediment components from different compositions and percentages of vegetation. Environmental Erosion Research Journal, 12(4), 158-173. 20.1001.1.22517812.1401.12.4.8.9. [In Persian]
Saeediyan, H., & Moradi, H.R. (2022). Comparing of the runoff and sediment of different land uses in Gachsaran and Aghajari formations under rain simulation. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 2(2), 55-68. doi:10.22098/MMWS.2022.9802.1065. [In Persian]
Sheridan, G.J., Noske, P.J., Lane, P.N., & Sherwin, C. B. (2008). Using rainfall simulation and site measurements to predict annual interrill erodibility and phosphorus generation rates from unsealed forest roads: Validation against in-situ erosion measurements. Catena73(1), 49-62. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2007.08.006
Snelder, D.J., & Bryan, R.B. (1995). The use of rainfall simulation tests to assess the influence of vegetation density on soil loss on degraded rangelands in the Baringo District, Kenya. Catena25(1-4), 105-116. doi:10.1016/0341-8162(95)00003-B
Sutherland, R.A. (1998). Rolled erosion control systems for hillslope surface protection: a critical review, synthesis and analysis of available data. I. Background and formative years. Land Degradation & Development9(6), 465-486. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099145X(199811/12)9:6<465::AID-LDR311>3.0.CO;2-4
Wildhaber, Y.S., Bänninger, D., Burri, K., and Alewell, C. (2012). Evaluation and application of a portable rainfall simulator on subalpine grassland, Catena, 91, 56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2011.03.004
Wu, S., Wu, P., Feng, H., & Merkley, G.P. (2011). Effects of alfalfa coverage on runoff, erosion and hydraulic characteristics of overland flow on loess slope plots. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China5, 76-83. doi:10.1007/s11783-011-0282-x
Yaghmai, L., Sabohi, R., & Hajjaforushnia, Sh. (2008). Drought analysis using GIS (case study of Kashan region), The Second National Conference on the Effects of Drought and Its Management Solutions. [In Persian]
Zhang, G., Liu, G., Zhang, P., & Yi, L. (2014). Influence of vegetation parameters on runoff and sediment characteristics in patterned Artemisia capillaris plots. Journal of Arid Land6, 352-360. doi:10.1007/s40333-013-0224-5