Evaluating the sensitivity of the landslide event using the support vector machine algorithm

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Department, Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Zanjan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Department, Khorasan-e-Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Khorasan-e-Razavi, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
landslide risk assessment provides a systematic framework for evaluating the likelihood and potential consequences of landslides in a given area. It involves the identification and analysis of key factors contributing to landslide occurrence, such as slope characteristics, geological formations, land use patterns, rainfall patterns, and human activities. By integrating these factors into a comprehensive risk assessment methodology, stakeholders can better understand the vulnerability of areas and populations at risk and develop appropriate strategies and measures to mitigate and manage landslide hazards. Advancements in geospatial technologies, such as geographic information systems (GIS), remote sensing, and machine learning algorithms, have significantly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of landslide risk assessment. These tools enable the integration and analysis of diverse data sources, including topographic data, satellite imagery, and historical landslide records, to create detailed landslide susceptibility and hazard maps. These maps provide valuable information for prioritizing risk-prone areas, implementing land-use regulations, designing engineering structures, and formulating early warning systems. This study aims to contribute to the field of landslide risk assessment by evaluating the key factors influencing landslide occurrence and developing a comprehensive methodology for assessing landslide risks in the Chesb Watershed, Zanjan Province. The research findings will provide valuable insights for land managers, policymakers, and stakeholders involved in disaster risk reduction, land-use planning, and infrastructure development. By understanding and effectively managing landslide risks, communities can build resilience, protect lives and property, and ensure sustainable development in landslide-prone regions.
 
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted in the catchment area of Chesb, which is located in the city of Eejrud, Zanjan province, between geographical longitudes 36.13 to 36.27 degrees and geographical latitudes 48.1 to 48.41 degrees. To begin, a comprehensive review of literature was conducted to gather existing knowledge and identify influential factors related to landslides. Additionally, field visits were conducted to gather on-site information and observations. Based on the collected information, various data layers were prepared using a GIS. These layers included slope, slope direction, elevation classes, geology, distance from the drainage network to the river, distance from roads, distance from faults, topographic indices (such as stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), and slope length factor (LS), geomorphological indices (such as topographic position index (TPI), topographic roughness index, and curvature index), land use, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and precipitation.After data preparation, a total of 81 landslide occurrences were identified in the study area through field surveys and previous studies. For landslide risk modeling, 70% of the landslide points were used to train the support vector machine (SVM) model, while the remaining 30% were used for model validation. Using the SVM model, a sensitivity map for landslides occurrence was generated. The model utilized the prepared data layers to identify areas with varying levels of sensitivity to landslides, ranging from very low to very high.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of the study revealed important findings related to landslides and their risk assessment in the Chesb Watershed, Zanjan Province. The sensitivity map generated by the SVM provided valuable insights into the areas prone to landslides. According to the sensitivity map, approximately 30.63% of the watershed area fell into the very low sensitivity class, indicating a lower likelihood of landslides in these areas. The low sensitivity class covered 17.82% of the area, suggesting a relatively lower risk of landslides. The moderate sensitivity class covered 15.43% of the area, indicating a medium level of landslide risk. The high sensitivity class encompassed 17.33% of the area, reflecting a considerable risk of landslides. Lastly, the very high sensitivity class covered 18.5% of the area, representing the highest risk of landslides. The efficiency of the SVM model was also evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the validation phase was found to be 0.874. This AUC value indicates a very good capability of the model in classifying and identifying landslide-prone areas in the Chesb catchment area.These findings were consistent with previous research on landslides and demonstrated the effectiveness of the SVM model in identifying landslide-prone areas. The sensitivity map derived from the model can be instrumental in land-use planning, disaster risk management, and decision-making processes aimed at minimizing the impact of landslides.
 
Conclusion
Landslides occur when masses of soil, rocks, and debris rapidly move downhill under the influence of gravity. it can be triggered by various factors, including heavy rainfall, seismic activities, slope instability, geological conditions, and human activities. Landslides can result in devastating consequences such as loss of life, property damage, disruption of transportation networks, and ecological disturbances. To address these challenges, landslide risk assessment provides a systematic framework for evaluating the likelihood and potential consequences of landslides in a given area. It involves the identification and analysis of key factors contributing to landslide occurrence, such as slope characteristics, geological formations, land use patterns, rainfall patterns, and human activities. By integrating these factors into a comprehensive risk assessment methodology, stakeholders can better understand the vulnerability of areas and populations at risk and develop appropriate strategies and measures to mitigate and manage landslide hazards.The research identified the most influential factors in landslides occurrence and developed a sensitivity map using a SVM. The findings highlighted the areas with varying levels of sensitivity to landslides, ranging from low to very high. These results can inform land-use planning strategies, allowing policymakers and stakeholders to better manage and mitigate the risk of landslides in the study area. The outcomes of this study contribute to the broader knowledge on landslides and provide valuable insights for disaster risk reduction efforts in the Chesb Watershed. The obtained sensitivity map can guide land managers, decision-makers, and authorities in implementing appropriate mitigation measures and ensuring the safety of the population and infrastructure in the area.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Afifi, M.I. (2021). Spatial analysis of landslide risk with emphasis on geomorphological factors using stochastic forest model (Case study: Larestan city in Fars province). Quarterly Journal of Physical Geography14 (51), 39-53. dor: 20.1001.1.20085656.1400.14.51.3.0. [In Persian]
Aleotti, P., & Chowdhury, R. (1999). Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 58, 21-44. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s100640050066
Arabameri, A., Pourghasemi, H.R., & Yamani, M. (2017). Applying different scenarios for landslide spatial modeling using computational intelligence methods. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, 1-20. doi:10.1007/s12665-017-7177-5
Arabameri, A., Saha, S., Roy, J., Chen, W., Blaschke, T., & Tien Bui, D. (2020). Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the Gallicash River Watershed, Iran. Remote Sensing, 12(3), 475. doi:10.3390/rs12030475
Assilzadeh, H., Levy, J.K., & Wang, X. (2010). Landslide catastrophes and disaster risk reduction: A GIS framework for landslide prevention and management. Remote Sensing, 2(9), 2259-2273. doi:10.3390/rs2092259
Ayalew, L., & Yamagishi, H. (2005). The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology, 65(1-2), 15-31. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.010
Azimpour Moghaddam, V. (2015). Risk zoning of landslides using Bayesian theory and Dempster-Shafer theory: A case study of a section of the Babolroud watershed. M.Sc. Thesis, Sari University. 123 p. [In Persian]
Corominas, J., van Westen, C., Frattini, P., Cascini, L., Malet, J.P., Fotopoulou, S., Catani, F., Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Mavrouli, O., Agliardi, F., Pitilakis, K., Winter, M., Pastor, M., Ferisi, S., Tofani, V., Hervas, J., & Smith, J.T. (2013). Recommendations for the quantitative assessment of landslide risk. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 73, 209-263. doi:10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
Dastranj, A., & Karimi, E. (2022). Landslide susceptibility predicting using the maximum entropy machine learning algorithm (Bar catchment of Nishapur). Researches in Earth Sciences, 13(3), 76-96. doi:10.48308/esrj.2022.102965. [In Persian]
Emadodin, S., Taheri, V., Mohammad Ghasemi, M., & Nazari, Z. (2021). Landslide susceptibility zonation applying frequency ratio models and statistical index in in Oghan watershed. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 9(4), 75-95. doi:10.22034/gmpj.2021.248268.1211 [In Persian]
Esfandiary Darabad, F., Rahimi, M., Navidfar, A., & Arsalan, M. (2020). Assessment of landslide sensitivity by neural network method and vector machine algorithm (Case study: Heyran Road -Ardebil province). Quantitative Geomorphological Research9(3), 18-33. doi:10.22034/gmpj.2020.122210. [In Persian]
Froude, M.J., & Petley, D.N. (2018). Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 18(8), 2161-2181. doi:10.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018
Furlani, S., & Ninfo, A. (2015). Is the present the key to the future? Earth-Science Reviews, 142, 38-46. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.12.005
Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Cardinali, M., Galli, M., & Ardizzone, F. (2005). Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology, 72(1-4), 272-299. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.002
Hallaji, M., Zanganeh Asadi, M.A., & Amirahmadi, A. (2020). An Assessment of the landslide susceptibility prediction models in the Bar Watershed-Neyshabur. Watershed Management Researches, 33(2), 20-30. doi:10.22092/wmej.2019.126950.1241. [In Persian]
Hong, H., Pradhan, B., Xu, C., & Bui, D.T. (2015). Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena133, 266-281. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2015.05.019
Lee, S., Hong, S.M., & Jung, H.S. (2017). A support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping in Gangwon Province, Korea. Sustainability, 9(1), 48.  doi:10.3390/su9010048
Li, L., Lan, H., Guo, C., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., & Wu, Y. (2017). A modified frequency ratio method for landslide susceptibility assessment. Landslides, 14, 727-741. doi:10.1007/s10346-016-0771-x
Mohammadi, N., & Sasanpour, F. (2021). Risk analysis of landslide and debris flow occurrence on the Haraz and Lavasanat roads. Water and Soil Modeling and Management, 1(4),14-29. doi:10.22098/mmws.2021.9138. 1023 [In Persian]
Nadim, F., Kjekstad, O., Peduzzi, P., Herold, C., & Jaedicke, C. (2006). Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides, 3, 159-173. doi:10.1007/s10346-006-0036-1
Peng, L., Niu, R., Huang, B., Wu, X., Zhao, Y., & Ye, R. (2014). Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: A case of the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology, 204, 287-301.‌ doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.013
Petley, D. (2012). Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology, 40(10), 927-930. doi:10.1130/G33217.1
Pham, B.T., Prakash, I., Khosravi, K., Chapi, K., Trinh, P.T., Ngo, T.Q., Hosseini, S.V. and Bui, D.T. Pham, B.T., Prakash, I., Khosravi, K., Chapi, K., Trinh, P.T., Ngo, T. Q., . Hosseini, S.V., & Bui, D. T. (2019). A comparison of support vector machines and Bayesian algorithms for landslide susceptibility modelling. Geocarto International, 34(13), 1385-1407. doi:10.1080/10106049.2018.1489422
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B.D., Mihir, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2018). A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Science Reviews, 180, 60-91. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
Rostamizad, G. (2023). Assessing the potential and risk of landslides in Zanjan province (study area: Chesb watershed). A research project supported by the support of researchers and technologists of the country. 123 p. [In Persian]
Rostamizad, G., Khanbabaei, Z., & Tahamoures, M. (2022). Assessing the validity of the classification algorithms reviewed for the role of land use (Study: Taham Watershed). Environmental Erosion Research Journal, 12(4), 141-157.  http://magazine.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-710-fa.html. [In Persian]
Sepahvand, A.R., & Beiranvand, N. (2024). Mapping the susceptibility of landslide occurrence using machine learning algorithms (Study area: part of the Haraz watershed). Water and Soil Modeling and Management, 4(2), 261-278. doi:10.22098/mmws.2023. 12678.1263. [In Persian]
Shano, L., Raghuvanshi, T.K., & Meten, M. (2021). Landslide hazard zonation using logistic regression model: the Case of Shafe and Baso Catchments, Gamo Highland, Southern Ethiopia. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1-19. doi:10.1007/s10706-021-01873-1
Suyarto, R., Diara, I.W., Susila, K.D., Saifulloh, M., Wiyanti, W., Kusmiyarti, T.B., & Sunarta, I.N. (2023). Landslide inventory mapping derived from multispectral imagery by support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1190, (1), 012012. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1190/1/012012
Tyagi, A., Tiwari, R.K., & James, N. (2021). GIS-based landslide hazard zonation and risk studies using MCDM. In Local Site Effects and Ground Failures: Select Proceedings of 7th ICRAGEE 2020 (pp. 251-266). Springer Singapore.‏ doi:10.1007/978-981-15-9984-2_22
Wang, Z., & Brenning, A. (2021). Active-learning approaches for landslide mapping using support vector machines. Remote Sensing, 13(13), 2588. doi:10.3390/rs13132588
Wu, W., Zucca, C., Muhaimeed, A.S., Al-Shafie, W.M., Al-Quraishi, A.M.F., Nangia, V., Zhu MinQiang, Z.M., & Liu GuangPing, L.G.,Wu, W., Zucca, C., Muhaimeed, A.S., Al‐Shafie, W.M., Fadhil Al‐Quraishi, A.M., Nangia, V., Zhu, M., Liu, G. (2018). Soil salinity prediction and mapping by machine learning regression in Central Mesopotamia, Iraq. Land Degradation & Development, 29(11), 4005-4014. doi:10.1002/ldr.3148
Yarahmadi, J., Amini, A., & Rostamizad, G. (2023). Accuracy assessment of pistachio climate suitability map based on ROC curve. Environment and Water Engineering, 9(1), 127-140. doi:10.22034/jewe.2021.262531.1486. [In Persian]
Zali, M., & Shahedi, K. (2021). Assessment of landslide sensitivity using fuzzy logic approach and geographic information systems in the Nekarud watershed. Water and Soil Modeling and Management, 1(1), 67-80. doi:10.22098/mmws.2021.1183 [In Persian]
Zhou, X., Wu, W., Lin, Z., Zhang, G., Chen, R., Song, Y., Wang, Z., Lang, T., Qin, Y., Ou, P., Huangfu, W., Zhang, Y., Xie, L., Huang, X., Fu, X., Li, J., Jiang, J., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Peng, Sh., Shao, C., Bai, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, X., & Liu, W. (2020). Landslide risk zoning in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1-21. doi:10.5194/nhess-2020-270
Zhu, A.X., Miao, Y., Liu, J., Bai, S., Zeng, C., Ma, T., & Hong, H. (2019). A similarity-based approach to sampling absence data for landslide susceptibility mapping using data-driven methods. Catena, 183, 104188. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104188