Estimation of Groundwater Levels in Arid Climates Using Machine Learning and Fuzzy Intelligent Systems

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences and Statistics, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction

The escalating global demand for water, driven by population growth, urbanization, climate change, and excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides, has significantly impacted groundwater levels, leading to soil salinization and desertification. Continuous groundwater extraction exacerbates aquifer depletion, increasing pumping costs and limiting production capacity. Accurate groundwater level estimation is critical for effective water resource management, especially in arid and semi-arid regions like South Khorasan, Iran, where water scarcity is pronounced. This study aims to address the challenge of predicting monthly groundwater level fluctuations in the Birjand plain using advanced modeling techniques. Traditional physical and numerical models, while reliable, face limitations such as high computational demands, data dependency, and inability to handle nonlinear conditions effectively. In contrast, data-driven and artificial intelligence-based models offer simplicity, speed, and reasonable accuracy, particularly when historical data is available (Norouzi Khatiri et al., 2023). Fuzzy logic-based models, especially nonlinear fuzzy regression, excel in handling uncertainty and complex relationships in hydrological systems (Asadollahi, 2023). This research evaluates three fuzzy-based models—nonlinear fuzzy support vector regression (NLF-SVR), fuzzy nonlinear autoregressive regression (FNAR), and fuzzy linear least squares regression (FLSR)—using climatic variables (temperature, precipitation, humidity, and evapotranspiration) to enhance prediction accuracy and support sustainable groundwater.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in the Birjand plain, South Khorasan, Iran, a region characterized by an arid climate with an average annual rainfall of 169 mm in the plain and 216 mm in the highlands. The Birjand aquifer, spanning 3155 km², is heavily exploited, making it a critical case study for groundwater management. A comprehensive dataset covering daily climatic variables—mean air temperature (Tave), precipitation (Prc), relative humidity (RH), and evapotranspiration (ETo)—from April 1998 to March 2017 was compiled from regional meteorological and water authority stations. After quality control and preprocessing, daily data were aggregated into monthly values. The dataset was split into 70% for model training and 30% for validation. Three fuzzy-based models were developed: (1) Fuzzy Linear Least Squares Regression (FLSR), which extends classical regression to handle fuzzy data; (2) Nonlinear Fuzzy Support Vector Regression (NLF-SVR), combining fuzzy logic with support vector machines for nonlinear relationships; and (3) Fuzzy Nonlinear Autoregressive Regression (FNAR), designed for multi-variable fuzzy predictions. Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). Fuzzy numbers, particularly triangular fuzzy numbers, were used to model uncertainty, with Gaussian kernels applied for FNAR and NLF-SVR. Parameter optimization was achieved using grid search and generalized cross-validation (GCV).

Results and Discussion

The analysis revealed that the NLF-SVR model outperformed both FNAR and FLSR in predicting monthly groundwater levels in the Birjand plain, achieving an average RMSE of 0.15 m, MAE of 0.37 m, and NSE of 0.99. The model effectively captured complex, nonlinear relationships between climatic variables (Tave, Prc, RH, ETo) and groundwater levels, particularly during warmer months (July–September), where regular water consumption and evapotranspiration patterns enhanced predictability. In contrast, performance dipped in colder months (November–February) due to irregular precipitation and delayed groundwater recharge, aligning with findings by Zhang et al. (2022). The FNAR model showed acceptable performance, with higher sensitivity to seasonal climatic shifts, while FLSR struggled to model nonlinear dynamics, exhibiting higher errors and lower NSE. Nonlinear fuzzy models demonstrated robustness against outliers and noisy data, maintaining approximately 85% of their initial accuracy even with 30% noise, compared to a 60% accuracy drop in classical models. These findings align with studies by Sahoo et al. (2017) and Kumar et al. (2023), confirming the superiority of fuzzy-based approaches in handling hydrological uncertainties. Limitations include the study’s focus on a single region and reliance on climatic inputs alone, suggesting future inclusion of factors like land use and geological characteristics. The NLF-SVR model’s high accuracy supports its application in early.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that nonlinear fuzzy models, particularly NLF-SVR, provide superior accuracy for predicting monthly groundwater levels in the Birjand plain, with RMSE of 0.15 m and NSE of 0.99, outperforming FNAR and FLSR. The ability of NLF-SVR to model complex, nonlinear relationships and handle data uncertainties makes it a robust tool for hydrological forecasting in arid climates. Key findings include the models’ enhanced performance during warmer months and reduced accuracy in colder seasons due to variable precipitation patterns. The robustness of fuzzy models against outliers and noisy data eliminates extensive preprocessing, preserving valuable information. Practically, NLF-SVR supports sustainable groundwater management through applications like drought warning systems and optimized irrigation scheduling. However, limitations such as region-specific data and the exclusion of non-climatic factors (e.g., land use, geology) suggest caution in generalizing results. Future research should test these models across diverse hydrogeological settings, integrate deep learning techniques, and incorporate additional variables like climate indices and satellite data. Developing multi-scale models to capture both short- and long-term fluctuations and creating decision-support systems for real-time water management are recommended. This study underscores the potential of fuzzy intelligent systems to enhance groundwater management in water-scarce regions, paving the way for advanced hydrological modeling.

Keywords

Main Subjects


منابع
اسداللهی، معصومه (1401). مدل‌های رگرسیونی استوار براساس بردار پشتیبان در محیط فازی (پایان‌نامه دکتری). دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران.
تقوایی، فهیمه، حسینی، خسرو و هاشمی، علی‌اصغر. (1403). پیشبینی تأثیر تغییر اقلیم بر تراز آب زیرزمینی با استفاده از الگوریتمهای فرا تکاملی (مطالعه موردی: دشت ریز-بوشهر). پژوهش آب ایران، 53، 48-39. doi: 10.22034/IWRJ.2023.14484.2548
زراعتی نیشابوری، سپیده، پوررضا بیلندی، محسن، خاشعی سیوکی، عباس و شهیدی، علی. (1399). مقایسه مدل رگرسیون فازی امکانی و رگرسیون کم‌ترین مربعات فازی در پیش‌بینی تراز سطح ایستابی آبخوان دشت نیشابور. علوم و مهندسی آبیاری، 43(1)، 143-131. doi: 10.22055/jise.2018.23275.1652
زراعتی نیشابوری، سپیده، پوررضا بیلندی، محسن، خاشعی سیوکی، عباس و شهیدی، علی. (1401). پیش بینی تراز آب زیرزمینی دشت نیشابور با معرفی مدل رگرسیون فازی امکانی. آبخوان و قنات، 3(1)، 64-53. doi: 10.22077/jaaq.2018.1727.1008
صدق‌آمیز، عباس و فروغی، فرید. (1402). پیش بینی نوسانات سطح آب زیرزمینی با استفاده از مدل‌های استنتاج فازی، استنتاج فازی عصبی و شبکه عصبی. سامانه‌های سطوح آبگیر باران، 11(4)، 50-31. doi: 20.1001.1.24235970.1402.11.4.3.5
عباس نوین پور، اسفندیار، کریمی، فاطمه و رضایی، حسین. (1401). پیش بینی سطح آب زیرزمینی دشت قروه با استفاده از مدل MODFLOW در سناریوهای مختلف تغییر اقلیم LARS-WG. دانش آب و خاک، 32(4)، 73-61. doi: 10.22034/ws.2021.30465.2197
 
Refrences
Abbassnouvinpour, E., Karimi, F., and Rezaie, H. (2022). The Prediction of Groundwater Level in Ghorve Plain Using the MODFLOW Model in Different Scenarios of LARS-WG Climate Change. Water and Soil Science, 32(4), 61-73. doi: 10.22034/ws.2021.30465.2197. [In Persian]
Aghlmand, R., & Abbasi, A. (2019). Application of MODFLOW with boundary conditions analyses based on limited available observations: A case study of Birjand plain in East Iran. Water, 11(9), 1904.
Ahmadi, A., Olyaei, M., Heydari, Z., Emami, M., Zeynolabedin, A., Ghomlaghi, A., Daccache, Graham E. F., & Sadegh, M. (2022). Groundwater level modeling with machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Water, 14(6), 949. doi: 10.3390/w14060949
Asadollahi, M. (2023). Robust regression models based on support vectors in a fuzzy environment (PhD dissertation). University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.[In Persian]
Badetiya, Y., & Barale, M. (2024). Modeling groundwater level using geographically weighted regression. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 17(9), 251.
Band, S. S., Heggy, E., Bateni, S. M., Karami, H., Rabiee, M., Samadianfard, S., Samadianfard, Chau, K-W., & Mosavi, A. (2021). Groundwater level prediction in arid areas using wavelet analysis and Gaussian process regression. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 15(1), 11471158. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2021.1944913
Bardossy, A., & Duckstein, L. (2022). Fuzzy rule-based modeling with applications to geophysical, biological, and engineering systems. CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9780138755133
Bardossy, A., Bogardi, I., & Duckstein, L. (1990). Fuzzy regression in hydrology. Water Resources Research, 26(7), 1497-1508. doi: 10.1029/WR026i007p01497
Chen, B. S., Lee, M. Y., Lin, T. H., & Zhang, W. (2021). Robust state/fault estimation and fault-tolerant control in discrete-time T–S fuzzy systems: An embedded smoothing signal model approach. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(7), 6886-6900. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3042984
Chukhrova, N., & Johannssen, A. (2019). Fuzzy regression analysis: systematic review and bibliography. Applied Soft Computing, 84, 105708.
Chutia, R., Saikia, S., & Gogoi, M. K. (2022). A theoretical approach to ranking of parametric fuzzy numbers using value and left–right ambiguity. Mathematical Sciences, 16(3), 299-315. doi: 10.1007/s40096-021-00422-4
Dehghani, R., & Torabi Poudeh, H. (2022). Application of novel hybrid artificial intelligence algorithms to groundwater simulation. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(5), 43514368.‏ doi: 10.1007/s13762-021-03596-5
Ehteram, M., & Banadkooki, F. B. (2023). A developed multiple linear regression (MLR) model for monthly groundwater level prediction. Water, 15(22), 3940. doi: 10.3390/w15223940
Elbeltagi, A., Salam, R., Pal, S. C., Zerouali, B., Shahid, S., Mallick, J., Islam, M.S., & Islam, A. R. M. T. (2022). Groundwater level estimation in northern region of Bangladesh using hybrid locally weighted linear regression and Gaussian process regression modeling. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 149(1), 131151.‏ doi: 10.1007 / s00704-022-04037-0
Feng, F., Ghorbani, H., & Radwan, A. E. (2024). Predicting groundwater level using traditional and deep machine learning algorithms. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1291327. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1291327
Guo, F. F., & Shen, J. (2019). A smoothing approach for minimizing a linear function subject to fuzzy relation inequalities with addition–min composition. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21, 281-290. doi: 10.1007/s40815-018-0530-3
Hesamian, G., & Akbari, M. G. (2020). A fuzzy additive regression model with exact predictors and fuzzy responses. Applied Soft Computing, 95, 106507. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106507
Jithendra, T., & Basha, S. S. (2023). Analyzing groundwater level with hybrid ANN and ANFIS using metaheuristic optimization. Earth science informatics, 16(4), 3323-3353.
Kung, C. F., & Hao, P. Y. (2023). Fuzzy Least Squares Support Vector Machine with Fuzzy Hyperplane. Neural Processing Letters, 55(6), 7415-7446. doi: 10.1007/s11063-023-11267-4
Li, W., Wei, Z., Chen, Y., Tang, C., & Song, Y. (2020). Fuzzy granular hyperplane classifiers. IEEE Access, 8, 112066-112077. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002904
Mohapatra, J. B., Jha, P., Jha, M. K., & Biswal, S. (2021). Efficacy of machine learning techniques in predicting groundwater fluctuations in agro-ecological zones of India. Science of the Total Environment, 785, 147319. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147319
Mohtashami, A., Monfared, S. A. H., Azizyan, G., & Akbarpour, A. (2022). Numerical simulation of groundwater in an unconfined aquifer with a novel hybrid model (case study: Birjand Aquifer, Iran). Journal of Hydroinformatics, 24(1), 160178.‏ doi: 10.2166/hydro.2021.113
Norouzi Khatiri, K., Nematollahi, B., Hafeziyeh, S., Niksokhan, M. H., Nikoo, M. R., & AlRawas, G. (2023). Groundwater management and allocation models: a review. Water, 15(2), 253.‏ doi: 10.3390/w15020253
Rezaei, A., Sayadi, M. H., Zadeh, R. J., & Mousazadeh, H. (2021). Assessing the hydrogeochemical processes through classical integration of groundwater parameters in the Birjand plain in eastern Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 15, 100684.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100684
Sahoo, S., Russo, T. A., Elliott, J., & Foster, I. (2017). Machine learning algorithms for modeling groundwater level changes in agricultural regions of the US. Water Resources Research, 53(5), 3878-3895. doi: 10.1002/2016WR019933
Sedghamiz, A., & Foroughi, F. (2023). Prediction of groundwater level fluctuations using fuzzy inference system, Adaptive Neuro–Fuzzy Inference System and neural network. Iranian Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems, 11(4), 31-50. doi: 20.1001.1.24235970.1402.11.4.3.5 [In Persian].
Taghvaei, F., Hosseini, K., & Hashemi, A. A. (2024). Predicting the impact of climate change on groundwater level using evolutionary algorithms: A case study of Riz Plain-Bushehr. Iranian Journal of Water Research, 53, 39–48. doi: 10.22034/IWRJ.2023.14484.2548. [In Persian]
Taheri, S. M., & Kelkinnama, M. (2012). Fuzzy linear regression based on least absolute deviations. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9(1), 121-140.
Tanaka, H. (1982). A linear regression model with fuzzy function. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 25, 162-173.
Tao, H., Hameed, M. M., Marhoon, H. A., Zounemat-Kermani, M., Heddam, S., Kim, S., Sulaiman, S.O., Tan, M.L., Sa’adi, Z., Mehr, A.D. and Allawi, M.F (2022). Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review. Neurocomputing, 489, 271-308.doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014.
Zeraati Neyshabouri, S., Pourreza Bilondi, M., Kashei-Siuki, A. and Shahidi, A. (2022). Estimating The Groundwater Table Of Neyshabour Plain With Introducing Fuzzy Possibilistic Regression Model. Journal of Aquifer and Qanat, 3(1), 53-64. doi: 10.22077/jaaq.2018.1727.1008. [In Persian]
Zeraati Neyshabouri, S., Pourreza Bilondi, M., Khashei Siuki, A., and Shahidi, A. (2020). Comparison of Fuzzy Possibilistic Regression and Fuzzy Least Squares Regression Models to Estimate Groundwater Level of Neyshabour Aquifer. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 43(1), 131-143. doi: 10.22055/jise.2018.23275.1652 [In Persian]
Zowam, F. J., & Milewski, A. M. (2024). Groundwater level prediction using machine learning and Geostatistical interpolation models. Water, 16(19), 2771. doi: 10.3390/w16192771