Digital transformation in environmental parameter measurement and monitoring: transitioning from traditional methods

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 وابستگی سازمانی: Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sanandaj, Iran

2 1Al-Turath University, Baghdad 10013, Iraq,

3 2Al-Mansour University College, Baghdad 10067, Iraq,

4 Al-Mamoon University College, Baghdad 10012, Iraq

5 Al-Rafidain University College Baghdad 10064, Iraq,

6 Madenat Alelem University College, Baghdad 10006, Iraq,

10.22098/mmws.2025.17790.1623

Abstract

Traditional environmental monitoring, which relies on manual sampling and laboratory analysis, often suffers from slow response times, high operational costs, and limited spatial or temporal resolution. These constraints hinder timely and informed decision-making, particularly in the face of accelerating environmental change. This study investigates the potential of digital technologies—primarily Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and Artificial Intelligence (AI)—to modernize environmental monitoring systems focused on air quality, water, and soil. A comparative design was employed to evaluate traditional methods against digital systems, incorporating IoT-enabled data collection and AI-driven analytics, supported by big data infrastructure. Key environmental indicators included PM2.5 concentration, soil moisture, water pH, temperature, and carbon emissions. The results showed significant improvements: measurement accuracy increased by approximately 20%, response time was reduced by 97.9%, and data processing speed surged by more than 19,900%, effectively reducing processing durations from several hours to near real-time. Operational costs decreased by over 50%. Additionally, predictive models powered by AI allowed for early warnings, while real-time data acquisition through IoT improved responsiveness to environmental threats. Although blockchain was not used directly for measurement or analysis, it played a critical role in ensuring data integrity, transparency, and traceability—factors essential to building trust in digital monitoring frameworks. Despite ongoing challenges such as scalability, energy consumption, and connectivity in rural regions, the findings highlight the potential of integrated digital tools to create more adaptive, efficient, and sustainable environmental management systems. These smart technologies present a path toward proactive governance and resilient ecosystem stewardship.The objective of this study is to investigate how the integration of advanced digital technologies such as IoT, AI, big data, and cloud computing, can revolutionize environmental monitoring and management. By assessing these tools’ potential to enhance data accuracy, responsiveness, and stakeholder collaboration, the research aims to develop proactive, transparent, and cost-effective strategies that address the complex challenges of ecological resilience and sustainable resource use in both urban and rural settings. The objective of this study is to investigate how the integration of advanced digital technologies such as IoT, AI, big data, and cloud computing, can revolutionize environmental monitoring and management. By assessing these tools’ potential to enhance data accuracy, responsiveness, and stakeholder collaboration, the research aims to develop proactive, transparent, and cost-effective strategies that address the complex challenges of ecological resilience and sustainable resource use in both urban and rural settings.



This study aimed to investigate the role of digital technologies in enhancing the effectiveness of environmental monitoring systems, particularly in relation to air, water, and soil quality. The results demonstrate that integrating IoT-based sensors, AI-driven analytics, cloud computing, and blockchain infrastructure can substantially improve measurement accuracy, reduce operational delays, and support faster and more informed decision-making. Real-time monitoring of parameters such as PM2.5 concentration, water pH, and soil moisture content proved notably more precise and reliable than traditional sampling methods, offering practical benefits for both environmental assessment and resource management. In particular, the ability to detect fluctuations in soil moisture and water quality at higher temporal resolution enabled quicker response to environmental risks, which is critical in ecosystems sensitive to drought, contamination, or land degradation. The automation of data collection and processing also led to significant gains in cost efficiency and processing speed, further confirming the operational advantages of digital transformation in environmental systems. Moreover, the application of AI-based predictive models supported proactive intervention, allowing environmental authorities to anticipate potential hazards and take early action before adverse impacts escalate. Nevertheless, the implementation of such technologies remains dependent on infrastructure readiness, reliable network connectivity, and energy efficiency—factors that may limit scalability in certain rural or underdeveloped areas. While tested in Iraq, these findings are applicable to other regions with similar environmental challenges, pending infrastructure upgrades. For example, in Iraq’s rural regions, limited broadband infrastructure, frequent network disruptions, and inconsistent mobile coverage posed significant challenges to continuous data transmission from IoT devices. These connectivity issues resulted in occasional data loss and reduced the overall effectiveness of real-time monitoring efforts. Furthermore, as digital systems become more deeply embedded in environmental governance, considerations around data ownership, system interoperability, and long-term sustainability will need to be addressed. Based on the findings, future research should explore strategies for optimizing low-power digital monitoring frameworks, enhancing sensor durability in diverse terrain, and developing governance mechanisms that ensure data transparency and equitable access. Such efforts are essential for building resilient, responsive, and inclusive systems capable of supporting long-term environmental stewardship.

Based on the comparative performance analysis, IoT-based real-time sensing combined with AI-powered predictive analytics proved to be the most effective in improving measurement accuracy and response time. These tools are highly recommended for environmental monitoring applications, particularly in water and soil resource management. Blockchain, while essential for ensuring data transparency and integrity, had a relatively lower direct impact on measurement accuracy and operational efficiency, and thus is recommended primarily as a supplementary tool for secure data governance rather than for core monitoring tasks

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Abdelhalim, A. M., Ibrahim, N., & Alomair, M. (2023). The moderating role of digital environmental management accounting in the relationship between eco-efficiency and corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 15(9). doi: 10.3390/su15094682
Ahamed, A., Foye, J., Poudel, S., & Trieschman, E. (2023). Machine learning in environmental analytics: A cost-efficiency perspective. Forests, 14(10).
Ahmadpari, H., & Khaustov, V. (2025). Agricultural drought monitoring using meteorological indices in Darreh Dozdan Basin, Iran. Advances in Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, 2(2), 72–84. doi: 10.22034/acees.2025.512324.1022
Ahmed, K., & Zhao, M. (2023). COVID-19 and the acceleration of environmental digitalization. Global Environmental Health Review, 6(4), 203–221.
Alotaibi, E., & Nassif, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in environmental monitoring: In depth analysis. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4, 84.
Amini, A., Ali, T. M., Ghazali, A. H. B., & Huat, B. K. (2009). Adjustment of peak streamflows of a tropical river for urbanization. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5(4), 285–294. doi: 10.3844/ajessp.2009.285.29
Arowolo, M., Aaron, W., Kugbiyi, A., Eteng, U., Iloh, D., Aguma, C., & Olagunju, A. (2024). Integrating AI enhanced remote sensing technologies with IoT networks for precision environmental monitoring and predicative ecosystem management. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(02), 2156–2166. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2573
Audu, A., Umana, A., & Garba, B. (2024). The role of digital tools in enhancing environmental monitoring and business efficiency. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Updates, 8, 039–048. doi: 10.53430/ijmru.2024.8.2.0052
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
Brasoveanu, F. (2024). Transparency and public participation in EU environmental decisionmaking: Strengthening global governance and regional cooperation. Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series, XXIII(2), 28–35. doi: 10.61801/OUAESS.2023.2.04
Bwambale, E., Abagale, F. K., & Anornu, G. K. (2022). Smart irrigation monitoring and control strategies for improving water use efficiency in precision agriculture: A review. Agricultural Water Management, 260, 107324.
Choudhury, M., & Haque, C. E. (2024). Disaster management policy changes in Bangladesh: Drivers and factors of a shift from reactive to proactive approach. Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(5), 445–462. doi: 10.1002/eet.1982
Feroz, A., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability. doi: 10.3390/su131810815
Fried, H. S., Hamilton, M., & Berardo, R. (2022). Closing integrative gaps in complex environmental governance systems. Ecology and Society, 27(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-12914-270101
Gharibreza, M., Nasrollahi, A., Afshar, A., Amini, A., & Eisaei, H. (2018). Evolutionary trend of the Gorgan Bay (southeastern Caspian Sea) during and post the last Caspian Sea level rise. Catena, 163, 213–222. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.016
He, X., & Chen, W. (2024). Digital transformation and environmental, social, and governance performance from a human capital perspective. Sustainability, 16(11). doi: 10.3390/su16011526
Huang, S., Zhang, X., Chen, N., Ma, H., Fu, P., Dong, J., et al. (2022). A novel fusion method for generating surface soil moisture data with high accuracy, high spatial resolution, and high spatio-temporal continuity. Water Resources Research, 58(5), e2021WR030827. doi: 10.1029/2021WR030827
Jabrane, M., Touiouine, A., Bouabdli, A., Chakiri, S., Mohsine, I., Valles, V., et al. (2023). Data conditioning modes for the study of groundwater resource quality using a large physico-chemical and bacteriological database, Occitanie Region, France. Water, 15(1). doi: 10.3390/w15010083
Kargas, A., Gkika, E. C., & Sepetis, A. (2024). Exploring digital transformation intensity and its relationship with sustainability: Greek managers’ perspectives. Sustainability, 16(14).
Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2023). Reactive vs. predictive environmental governance: A comparative review. Environmental Monitoring Journal, 12(4), 301–315. doi: 10.3390/su16145678
Lakhiar, I. A., Yan, H., Zhang, C., Wang, G., He, B., Hao, B., ... & Rakibuzzaman, M. (2024). A review of precision irrigation water-saving technology under changing climate for enhancing water use efficiency, crop yield, and environmental footprints. Agriculture, 14(7), 1141.
Li, C., Wang, L., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Cybersecurity in cloud-based environmental systems: A risk assessment. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 35(3), 213–228.
Mahajan, S., Chen, L.-J., & Tsai, T.-C. (2018). Short-term PM2.5 forecasting using exponential smoothing method: A comparative analysis. Sensors, 18(10), 3223. doi: 10.3390/s18103223
Martinez, R., & Johnson, D. (2024). AI-driven interventions for sustainable land management. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 20(1), 64–79.
Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., et al. (2023). Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: Mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, 15(14). doi: 10.3390/su151410698
Nguyen, T., & Patel, J. (2025). Smart governance for ecological resilience: Global adoption trends. International Journal of Sustainability Studies, 13(1), 99–117.
Othman, A. A., Al-Saady, Y., Obaid, A., & Gloaguen, R. (2012). Environmental change detection in the central part of Iraq using remote sensing data and GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(3). doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-0870-0
Popescu, S. M., Mansoor, S., Wani, O. A., Kumar, S. S., Sharma, V., Sharma, A., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and IoT driven technologies for environmental pollution monitoring and management. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.00052
Rawashdeh, A., Abdallah, A. B., Alfawaeer, M., Al Dweiri, M., & Al-Jaghbeer, F. (2024). The impact of strategic agility on environmental sustainability: The mediating role of digital transformation. Sustainability, 16(3). doi: 10.3390/su16030811
Shahid, I., Shahzad, M. I., Tutsak, E., Mahfouz, M. M. K., Al Adba, M. S., Abbasi, S. A., et al. (2024). Carbon-based sensors for air quality monitoring networks; Middle East perspective. Frontiers in Chemistry, 12. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.00045
Shao, X., Ahmad, M., & Javed, F. (2024). Firm-level digitalization for sustainability performance: Evidence from Ningbo City of China. Sustainability, 16(20). doi: 10.3390/su16208444
Shen, A., & Wang, R. (2023). Digital transformation and green development research: Microscopic evidence from China’s listed construction companies. Sustainability, 15(16). doi: 10.3390/su15169192
Shen, Y., Yang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023). Impact of digital technology on carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese cities. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.00058
Singh, A., Patel, H., & Ouyang, X. (2024). Real-time AI algorithms for environmental data analytics. Journal of Smart Environmental Systems, 5(2), 77–91.
Soussi, A., Zero, E., Sacile, R., Trinchero, D., & Fossa, M. (2024). Smart sensors and smart data for precision agriculture: a review. Sensors, 24(8), 2647.
Su, X., Wang, S., & Li, F. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance based on the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 15(18). doi: 10.3390/su151810239
Talebian, S. , Golkarieh, A. , Eshraghi, S. , Naseri, M. and Naseri, S. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Impacts on Architecture and Smart Built Environments: A Comprehensive Review. Advances in Civil Engineering and Environmental Science2(1), 45-56. doi: 10.22034/acees.2025.488106.1013
Xia, J., Wu, Z., & Chen, B. (2022). How digital transformation improves corporate environmental management: A review and research agenda. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.927718
Zhang, Y. (2024). A study on the correlation between the digital economy and resource allocation efficiency in the context of factor mobility. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1).
Zhong, Y., Zhao, H., & Yin, T. (2023). Resource bundling: How does enterprise digital transformation affect enterprise ESG development? Sustainability, 15(2). doi: 10.3390/su15020604