Evaluation of the effects of drought indicators on water poverty (Case Study: Gorgan Township)

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Water and Soil Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Water and Soil Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Cotton Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran

4 Ph.D. Student, Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Water resources are the common aspect of the goals and challenges of sustainable development, the lack of which is one of the big multidimensional problems of the current century and is one of the main reasons for positive and negative developments in the world. Therefore, the water poverty index (WPI) is one of the indices defined for this purpose. This index shows the effect of the combination of effective factors on the scarcity and stress of water resources. It provides the conditions for prioritizing and developing management versions in different regions. To determine water scarcity and poverty in each region, attention should be paid to the conditions of water resources in the studied region, the ability to calculate the index and the existence of information and data in the studied region, as well as the selection of selected criteria and components in that region. In this study, the water poverty index is used to investigate the shortage and tension of water resources and for its influence on drought, its relationship with univariate drought indices based on precipitation including standardized precipitation index (SPI) and Z score index (ZSI), and variable indices based on precipitation and evapotranspiration including standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and reconnaissance drought index (RDI) were searched.
 
Materials and Methods
The study area in this research is the Hashem-Abad meteorological station in Gorgan Township, and the statistical period for calculating the water poverty index based on the data available in the study area was considered to be 13 years (2003-2015). The water poverty index in this research is calculated based on five main components, which include the resource (groundwater loss), meteorological (temperature and precipitation), consumption (water need), capacity (river discharge), and environmental (salinity). Each of the components must be weighed after calculating to calculate the water poverty index. For this purpose, the AHP hierarchical technique was used. First, a questionnaire was prepared and the components were scored based on the opinion of regional water experts and university professors, then, using Expert Choice software, the weight of the main components of the water poverty index was determined, and finally, the WPI for the study area in this research was also estimated. Then, in the next step, drought indices SPI, SPEI, RDI, and ZSI were calculated in 6-month and 12-month time windows. To calculate the drought indices, the precipitation and temperature data at the Hashem-Abad meteorological station for a period of 30 years (1990-2019) were considered, which were sorted monthly and the coding necessary to calculate the SPI and SPEI indices in time windows 6 and 12 months was done by R programming and statistical software. Also, two indicators, RDI and ZSI, were calculated in the Excel software. Finally, the relationship between drought indices and the water poverty index was searched based on simple one-to-multivariate correlations.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of the water poverty index’s components showed that the resources and environment component had the highest value in 2009 and 2010 and the lowest value in 2010 and 2016, respectively. About meteorological, capacity, and consumption components, the highest values were in the years 2010, 2004, and 2009, respectively, and the lowest values occurred in the years 2010, 2016, and 2016, respectively. Questionnaire analysis of WPI components with AHP showed that resources and environment components had the highest and lowest weights with values of 0.354 and 0.041, respectively. However, by multiplying these weights by their related components, it was found that the components of consumption, environment, resources, meteorology, and capacity had the greatest effect in calculating the water poverty index. The range of WPI changes during the years (2004-2016) varies from 26 to 82, so 2014, which is one of the driest years, the region was in the poorest state of water resources and the year 2008 had the best conditions. Considering the average WPI of about 55, out of the 13 years studied, the WPI was lower than the average in 8 years. In the next step, due to the lack of data, there was no possibility of non-linear modeling, therefore, simple one-to-multivariate correlations were used. The results of these correlations showed that the use of the multivariate linear regression method by considering the drought index in a 12-month time window along with two six-month time windows related to the first and second half of the year increases their correlation with the water poverty index. Examining the effect of the time window considered for the drought index on the water poverty index shows that the 12-month time window has a higher correlation than the six-month time window. Also, among the six-month time windows, in the SPEI index, the first six months of the year, which includes the spring and summer seasons, had a higher correlation with the water poverty index. Correlation results between drought indices and WPI showed that the annual time interval is more suitable than the 6-month time one. And among the 4 indices studied, the SPEI index with R2=0.90 had the highest correlation while the ZSI index with R2=0.81 had the lowest correlation with WPI.
 
Conclusion
Based on the results of the components of the water poverty index in this research, it was observed that the consumption component in the Gorgan region had the biggest role in the WPI estimation, so water conservation can have a great contribution to solving water poverty. Due to the high volume of water consumption in the agricultural sector, some measures should be taken to manage water consumption and choose the appropriate cultivation patterns. The high correlation of WPI with drought indices, especially the SPEI variable index, makes the importance of creating a drought monitoring and forecasting system more tangible, and due to global warming and climate change in the future, which this region is not exempt from, it can make the problems of water poverty and lack of water more severe in this region.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abramowits, M., & Stegun, I.A. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover Publication, New York.
Ahmad, M., Sinclair, C., & Werritty, A. (1988). Loglogistic flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 98(3-4), 205-224. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(88)90015-7
Asiabi-Hir, R., Mostafazadeh, R., Raoof, M., & Esmali-Ouri, A. (2015).Water poverty index and its importance in water resources management. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 3(11), 17-22. https://www.wmji.ir/article_697021.html. [In Persian]
Asiabi-Hir, R., Mostafazadeh, R., Raoof, M., & Esmali-Ouri, A. (2018). Multi-criteria evaluation of water poverty index spatial variations in some watersheds of Ardabil Province. Iranian Journal of Echohydrology, 4(4), 943-1268. doi:10.22059/ije.2017.63231. [In Persian]
Avazpour, N., Faramarzi, M., Omidipour, R., & Mehdizadeh, H. (2022). Monitoring the drought effects on vegetation changes using satellite imagery (Case Study: Ilam Catchment). Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 11(4), 125-143. doi:10.22126/ges.2022.7130.2472. [In Persian]
Bani Mahd, S,. Adib, S., & Khalili, D. (2011). Analyzing comparisons of SPEI and SPI meteorological drought indicators by using parametric and non-parametric correlation tests in selected stations of Iran. The First National Conference on Ways to Achieve Sustainable Development (Agriculture, Natural Resources And Environment). Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/196589/. [In Persian]
Barakhanpour, S., Ghorbani, K., Salarijazi, M., & Rezaeighale, L. (2021). Aanlysis of trend of evaporation changes and determining the role of factors affecting it using quantile regression and bayesian quantile regression  (Case Study: Hashem-Abad Station, Gorgan). Journal of Climate Research, 12(46), 73-88. https://clima.irimo.ir/article_137528.html?lang=en. [In Persian]
Edwards,D.C., & McKee, T.B. (1997). Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United States at multiple time scales. Climatology Report, 97-2. http://hdl.handle.net/10217/170176
Farsani, I.F., Farzaneh, M.R., Besalatpour, A.A., Salehi, M.H., & Faramarzi, M. (2019). Assessment of the impact of climate change on spatiotemporal variability of blue and green water resources under CMIP3 and CMIP5 models in a highly mountainous watershed. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 136(1-2), 169-184. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00704-018-2474-9
Ghorbani, Kh. (2019). Spatial and temporal analysis of groundwater level fluctuations in deep and shallow aquifers of Golestan province using nonparametric statistical tests in GIS environment. Iranian Journal Irrigation and Drainage, 13(5), 1504-1514. dor:20.1001.1.20087942.1398.13.5.28.2. [In Persian]
Givati, A., Thirel, G., Rosenfeld, D., & Paz, D. (2019). Climate change impacts on streamflow at the upper Jordan River based on an ensemble of regional climate models. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 21, 92-109. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.12.004
Hargreaves, G.H., & Samani, Z.A. (1985). Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 1(2), 96- 99. doi:10.13031/2013.26773
Jahangir, M.H., Asghari Kolshani, F., & Sataryan asil, K. (2022). Comparative study of drought meteorological (SPI) and hydrological (SSI) indices based on the best cumulative distribution function for Urmia Basin. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 2(4), 53-63. doi:10.22098/mmws.2022.10810.1089. [In Persian]
Janbozorgi, M., Hanifeh Pour, M., & Khosravi, H. (2021). Temporal changes in meteorological-hydrological drought (Case study: Guilan Province). Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 1(2), 1-13. doi:10.22098/mmws.2021.1215 .[In Persian]
Kazemnezhad, Z., Farajzadeh, M., & Borna, R. (2019). Assessing vulnerability of agriculture in the face of climate change (Case Study: Gilan Province). Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazarts, 5(4), 89-106. https://sid.ir/paper/379900/en
McKee, T.B., Doesken, N.J., & Kleist, J. (1993, January). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, 17(22), 179-183.
Mojarrad, F., Qamraniya, H., & Nasiri, S. (2007). Estimation of effective rainfall and water requirement for rice cultivation in Mazandaran Plain. Geographical Research, 38(3), 54. https://jrg.ut.ac.ir/article_17770.html. [In Persian]
Morid, S., Smakhtin, V., & Moghaddasi, M. (2006). Comparison of seven meteorological indices for drought monitoring in Iran. International Journal of Climatology, 26(7), 971-985. doi:10.1002/joc.1264.
Nazarifar, M., & Salari, A. (2017). Drought risk assessment and zoning using the standardized precipitation index (SPI) (Case Study: Karkheh Basin). Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal, 6(15), 87-100. 10.22052/6.15.87. [In Persian]
Nosrati, K., & Zareiee, A.R. (2011). Assessment of meteorological drought using SPI in West Azarbaijan Province, Iran. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 15(4), 563- 569. [In Persian]
Pan ,Y.H., Gu ,C.J., Ma, J.Z., Zhang, T.S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Water poverty index in the inland River Basins of hexi corridor. Gansu Province. Advanced Materials Research, 864, 2371-2375. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.2371
Rezaei Ghaleh, L., & Ghorbani, Kh. (2018). Comparative analyses of SPI and SPEI meteorological drought indices (Case study: Golestan province).  Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 6(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.22125/agmj.2018.113661. [In Persian]
Salami, H., & Taheri Reykandeh, A. (2019). Assessing the state of water security in Provinces of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 33(1), 75-94. doi:10.22067/jead2.v0i0.77072. [In Persian]
Sobhani, R., Emadi, A., Fazloula, R., & Zamanzad-Ghavidel, S. (2022). Innovative measurement of water poverty index in West Azerbaijan Province based on effective data-mining mathematical-analytical models. Iran-Water Resources Research, 19(2), 54-70. dor: 20.1001.1.17352347.1402.19.2.4.1. [In Persian]
Sullivan, C.A., Meigh, J.R., & Giacomello, A.M. (2003). The water poverty index: development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, 27(3), 189-199. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.00054
Talebi, H., & Amini, A. (2017). Investigating the dimensions of water scarcity using the water poverty index (WPI) method and its comparative analysis in the parts of Qom city. Town and Country Planning, 10(2), 345-366. doi:10.22059/jtcp.2019.272853.669940. [In Persian]
Tsakiris, G. (2004). Meteorological drought assessment. Paper prepared for the needs of the European Research Program MEDROPLAN (Mediterranean Drought Preparedness and Mitigation Planning). Zaragoza, Spain volume.
Tsakiris, G., Pangalou, D., & Vangelis, H. (2007). Regional drought assessment based on the reconnaissance drought index (RDI). Water Resources Management, 21(5), 821-833. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9105-4
Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Beguería, S., & LópezMoreno, J.I. (2010). A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of Climatology, 23(7), 1696-1718. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
Wurtz, M., Angeliaume, A., Herrera, M.T.A., Blot, F., Paegelow, M., & Reyes, V.M. (2019). A spatial application of the water poverty index (WPI) in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico. Water Policy, 21(1), 147-161. doi: 10.2166/wp.2018.152
Yazdi, N., Mousavi, S. N., Shirvanian, A., Zarei, A. (2021). Assessing the Effects of Climate and Drought Changes on the Water Poverty Index in the Fasa Plain. Journal of Irriation and Water Engineering. 11(3). 289-304. 10.22125/iwe.2021.128206. [In Persian]
Ye, L., Shi, K., Zhang, H., Xin, Z., Hu, J., & Zhang, C. (2019). Spatio-temporal analysis of drought indicated by SPEI over Northeastern China. Water, 11(5), 908. doi:10.3390/w11050908
Zarei, A.R, Shabani, A., & Mahmoudi, M.R. (2019). Comparison of the climate indices based on the relationship between yield loss of rain-fed winter wheat and changes of climate indices using GEE model. Science of the Total Environment, 661, 711–722. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.204.
Zarei, A.R., & Moghimi, M.M. (2019). Environmental assessment of semi-humid and humid regions based on modeling and forecasting of changes in monthly temperature. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(3), 1457-1470. doi:10.1007/s13762-017-1600-z.
Zhang, R., Duan, Z., Tan, M., & Chen, X. (2012). The assessment of water stress with the water poverty index in the Shiyang River Basin in China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(7), 2155-2160. doi: 10.1007/s12665-012-1655-6.