Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic parameters of transport heavy metals Cd, Ni, and Zn in disturbed and undisturbed loamy soil columns

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistance Professor, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Soil contamination due to heavy metals is a global environmental issue. One vital aspect for understanding the impact of a contaminant in porous media is to describe their transport behavior using appropriate models. The governing equations for solute transport in soil consist of the convection–dispersion equation (CDE) and the mobile–immobile model (MIM). Mathematical models are usually used to evaluate solute transport in porous media. The first model used to express the transport of solutes and pollutants in porous media is CDE it provides acceptable and satisfactory results in homogeneous soils in laboratory tests. Hydrus-1D is a modeling environment for simulating water, heat, and solute movement in one-dimensional variably saturated media. Sensitivity analyses and model identification are standard approaches in modeling applications to investigate the relative importance of model components that control the system’s behavior. The sensitivity analysis is applied to identify the parameters that influence the model performance most. The sensitivity analysis is defined as the rate of variation in the model outputs due to changes in the input parameters. This study is a fundamental practice for analyzing the behavior of a model under different conditions of an application. The sensitivity analysis could be a practical and powerful tool for investigating the role and importance of model components, such as parameters and forcing data on the model responses.
 
Materials and Methods
The loamy soil samples were collected in both disturbed and undisturbed forms from a farm in the Qaramalek area with appropriate humidity located in western Tabriz, Iran, at 38º 5' 59.89'' north and 45º 12' 38.57'' east. To determine and present breakthrough curves, concentration values are required throughout the laboratory columns at different times. To simulate the CDE model, Hydrus software was used. Solute transport parameters such as diffusion coefficient (D), distribution coefficient (Kd), and dispersion coefficient (β) were estimated using soil hydraulic parameters and data related to the metal concentration of cadmium, nickel, and zinc by an inverse modeling method. A sensitivity analysis was carried out for the identification of the most influential factors on the model output. This method examines the impact of input data on a given model and its actual conditions. In line with this purpose, in each run, one input data was changed to a value equal to Positive and negative five to 15%, and the other input data was kept constant. To identify the effect of the input parameters of a given model on its output, the sensitivity analysis for the Hydrus model was utilized. The parameters of hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D), distribution coefficient (Kd), and spreading parameter (β) were changed between five to 15 %. Sensitivity analysis was carried out on cadmium, nickel, and zinc metals with densities equal to 50, 100, and 150 mg.l-1 in two disturbed and undisturbed soils.
 
Results and Discussion
Examining the breakthrough curves of cadmium in disturbed and undisturbed soils shows that the fitted curves using the Hydrus model and the measured curve almost coincide with each other, which is more obvious in disturbed soils. It should be noted that the model fits better in the disturbed soil than in the undisturbed soil. This may be due to the disruption of the structure the increase in the contact surface of the particles in the disturbed soil and the presence of heterogeneity in the undisturbed soil column. The simulation results show the transport of heavy metals (Zn, Ni, Cd) and Hydrus output have the highest and the lowest sensitivity to dispersion coefficient β and diffusion coefficient (D), respectively. In general, the impact of input parameters can be reported as follows: spreading parameter (β) > distribution coefficient (Kd) > dispersion coefficient (D). Therefore, it can be observed that D has a negligible effect on the model results; and consequently, measurement errors can be ignored.
 
Conclusion
Sensitivity analysis is used to analyze model behavior under different conditions. This analysis is used to investigate the relative importance of model components that control the system’s behavior. In this research, the transfer of hydraulic parameters of heavy metals Cd, Ni, and Zn in disturbed and undisturbed loam soil columns with initial concentrations of 50, 100, and 150 mg.l-1 was performed under the simulation of the Hydrus-1D model. The comparison of the simulated BTCs of the Hydrus-1D model and the measured data indicates a high agreement between the simulation curves and the measured data. Solute transport parameters such as hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D), distribution coefficient (Kd), and spreading parameter (β) were estimated using soil hydraulic parameters and data related to Cd, Ni, and Zn metal concentration by inverse modeling method. Based on the results of sensitivity analysis, the spreading parameter (β) and hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (D) had the highest and lowest sensitivity, respectively. In other words, due to the significant effect of β changes on the output values of the model, this parameter should be measured more accurately and on the other hand, the measurement errors of parameter D can be ignored. The degree of sensitivity of the parameters was independent of the initial concentration of the elements.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bear, J. (1972). Dynamic of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier Publishing, New York. doi:10.1016/S0166-2481(08)70538-5.
Burgers, S.L.G.E., Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., & Verwaart, T. (2010). Sensitivity analysis of an agent-based model of culture’s consequences for trade. In: Li Calzi, M., Milone, L., Pellizzari, P. (Eds.), Progress in Artificial Economics, 645, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 253–264. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13947-5_21
Ersahin, S., Papendick, R.I., Smith, J.L., Keller, C.K., & Manoranjan, V.S. (2002). Macropore transport of bromide as influenced by soil structure differences. Geoderma, 108, 207-223. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60334-5
Feddes, R.A., Kowalik, P., & Zarandy, H. (1978). Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Pudoc. Wageningen, Pp. 189.
Gove, L., Cook, C.M., Nicholson, F.A., & Beck, A.J. (2001). Movement of water and heavy metals (Zn, Cu, Pb and Ni) through sand and sandy loam amended with biosolids under steady-state hydrological conditions. Bioresource Technology, 78, 171-179. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00004-9
Huang, G., Huang, Q., Zhan, H., Chen, J., Xiong, Y., & Feng, S. (2005). Modeling contaminant transport in homogeneous porous media with fractional advection dispersion equation. Science China Earth Sciences., 48, 295-302. doi:10.1360/05yd0001
Huang, G., Huang Q., & Zhan H. (2006) Evidence of one-dimensional scale-dependent fractional advectiondispersion. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 85(1-2), 53-71. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.12.007
Jacques, D., Simunek, J., Timmerman, A., & Feyen, J. (2002). Calibration of Richards’ and convection–dispersion equations to field–scale water flow and solute transport under rainfall conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 259, 15-31. doi:10.1016/S00221694(01)00591-1
Jiang, Y., Yin, X., Guan, D., Jing, T., Sun, H., Wang, N., & Bai, J. (2019). Co-transport of Pb(II) and oxygen-content-controllable graphene oxide from electron-beam-irradiated graphite in saturated porous media. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 375, 297–304. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.001
Jirka Simunek, J. (2014). Comparision of CXTIFIT and HYDRUS-1D pojects. University of California Riverside.
Jury, W.A. (1982). Simulation of solute transport using a transfer function model. Water Resources Research, 18, 363-368. doi:10.1029/wr018i002p00363
Kanzari, S., Hachicha, M., & Bouhlila, R. (2015). Laboratory method for estimating solute transport parameters of unsaturated soils. American Journal of Geophysics, Geochemistry and Geosystems., 4, 149-154. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Lamboni, M., Monod, H., & Makowski, D. (2011). Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(4), 450–459. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.002
Li, N., & Ren, L. (2009). Application of continuous time random walk theory to non-equilibrium transport in soil. Journal of contaminant Hydrology, 108(3), 134–151. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.07.002
Lin, Q., & Xu, Sh. (2020). Co-transport of heavy metals in layered saturated soil: Characteristics and simulation. Environmental Pollution, 261, 114072. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114072
Liu, H.F., Genard, M., Guichard, S., & Bertin, N. (2007). Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(13), 3567-3580. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm202
Liu, X., Guo, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, Sh., Cao, X.,  Ou, Z., Zhang, W., & Chen, Zh. (2022). Modeling the transport behavior of Pb(II), Ni(II) and Cd(II) in the complex heavy metal pollution site under the influence of coexisting ions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 162, 211-218. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.016
Lurette, A., Touzeau, S., Lamboni, M., & Monod, H. (2009). Sensitivity analysis to identify key parameters influencing Salmonella infection dynamics in a pig batch. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 258(1), 43-52. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.026
Mao, M., & Ren, L. (2004). Simulating non-equilibrium transport of atrazine through saturated soil. Groundwater, 42, 500-508. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02618.x
Michel, K., & Ludwig, B. (2005). Modelling of seepage water composition from experiments with an acid soil and a calcareous sediment. Acta Hydrochimicaet Hydrobiologica, 33, 595-604. doi:10.1002/aheh.200400603
Moradi, G., & Mehdinejadiani, B. (2018). Modelling Solute transport in homogeneous and heterogeneous porous media using spatial fractional advection-dispersion equation. Soil and Water Research, 13(1), 18–28. doi: 10.17221/245/2016-SWR.
Morsali, S., Babazadeh, H., Shahmohammadi-kalalagh, Sh., & Sedghi, H. (2019). Simulating Zn, Cd and Ni Transport in Disturbed and Undisturbed Soil Columns: Comparison of Alternative Models. International Journal of Environmental Research, 13, 721-734. doi:10.1007/s41742-019-00212-w
Nguyen Ngoc, M., Dultz, S., & Kasbohm, J. (2009). Simulation of retention and transport of copper, lead and zinc in a paddy soil of the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 129, 8–16. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.06.008
Pang, L., & Close, M. (1999). Non-equilibrium transport of Cd in alluvial gravels. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 36, 185-206. doi:10.1016/S0169-7722(98)00110-7
Pietrzak, D. (2021). Modeling migration of organic pollutants in groundwater- review of available software. Environmental Modelling & Software, 144. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105145
Raoof, M., Akbari Baseri, Z., Rasoulzadeh, A., & Azizi Mobaser, J. (2022). Sensitivity analysis of Hydrus software to input data in simulating water movement and root uptake of grass as reference plant. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 2(3), 94-107 .doi: 10.22098/MMWS.2022.10847.1090. [In Persian]
Rouger, B., Goldringer, I., Barbillon, P., Miramon, A., Nanio Jika, A.K., & Thomas, M. (2023). Sensitivity analysis of a crop metapopulation model. Ecological Modelling, 475, 110174. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110174.
Saadati, Z., Delbari, M., Panahi, M., & Amiri, E. (2018). Simulation of sugar beet growth under water stress using AquaCrop model. Journal of Water and Soil Resources Conservation, 7(3), 1-18. dor: 20.1001.1.22517480.1397.7.3.1.9
Saltelli, A., Aleksankina, K., Becker, W., Fennell, P., Ferretti, F., Holst, N., Li, S., & Wu, Q. (2019). Why so many published sensitivity analyses are false: A systematic review of sensitivity analysis practices. Environmental Modelling & Software, 114, 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.012
Simunek, J., Sejna, M., & Van Genuchten, M.Th. (1998). The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media, Version 2.0, IGWMC-TPS-70, Int. Ground Water Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Co.
Shahmohammadi, Sh., & Beyrami, H. (2015). Modeling bromide transport in undisturbed soil columns with the continuous time random walk. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 33, 1511-1518.doi:10.1615/JPorMedia.v18.i12.20
Soares, L.M.V., & Calijuri, M.C. (2021). Sensitivity and identifiability analyses of parameters for water quality modeling of subtropical reservoirs. Ecological Modelling, 458, 109720. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109720.
Tyler, L.D., McBride M.B. (1982). Mobility and Extractability of Cadmium, Copper, Nickel and Zinc in Organic and Mineral Soil  Columns. Soil Science, 134(3), 198-205. Doi: 10.1097/00010694-198209000-00009
Van Genuchten, M.Th. (1980). A closed–form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(5), 892–898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
Wang, H., Liu, J., Yao, J., He, Q., Ma, J., Chai, H., Liu, C., Hu, X., Chen, Y., Zou, Y., Xiong, J., & Huangfu, X. (2020). Transport of Tl(I) in water-saturated porous media: Role of carbonate, phosphate and macromolecular organic matter. Water Research, 186, 116325. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116325
Xiong, Y., Huang, G., & Huang, Q. (2006). Modeling solute transport in one-dimensional homogeneous and heterogeneous soil columns with continuous time random walk. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 86(3-4), 163–175. doi:10.1016/J.JCONHYD.2006.03.001
Yang, B., Qiu, H., Zhang, P., He, E., Xia, B., Liu, Y., Zhao, L., Xu, X., & Cao, X. (2022). Modeling and visualizing the transport and retention of cationic and oxyanionic metals (Cd and Cr) in saturated soil under various hydrochemical and hydrodynamic conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 151467. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151467
Yang, J., Ge, M., Jin, Q., Chen, Z., & Guo, Z. (2019). Co-transport of U(VI), humic acid and colloidal gibbsite in water-saturated porous media. Chemosphere, 231, 405–414. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.091
Yuan, Y., & Peng, X. (2017). Fullerol-facilitated transport of copper ions in water-saturated porous media: influencing factors and mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 340, 96–103. doi10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.001
Zhang, H., Lu, T., Shang, Z., Li, Y., He, J., Liu, S., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Qi, Z. (2020). Transport of Cd(2+) through saturated porous media: insight into the effects of low-molecular- weight organic acids. Water Research, 168, 115182. doi:10.1016/j.watre. 2019.115182 
Zhi-Ming, Q., Shao-Yuan, F., & Helmers, M.J. (2012). modeling cadmium transp ort in neutral and alkaline soilcolumns at various depths. Pedosphere, 22(3), 273-282. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60014-9