Forecasting runoff using statistical methods, artificial intelligence, and meteorological models (case study: Amirkabir Dam)

Document Type : Case-study Article

Authors

1 Ph.D., Technical Expert of Iran Water and Power Company, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Ecology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The runoff generation in a watershed is mainly influenced by the hydrological, geomorphological, and climatic conditions of the region. Regarding rainfall-runoff models, the problem becomes very complicated due to the non-linear response of the watershed to the rain event. Prediction of daily river flow is one of the most important hydrological issues, which is very important for flood management. River flow rates can be estimated by several methods, each of which has strengths and weaknesses. Regarding rainfall-runoff models, the problem becomes very complicated due to the non-linear reaction of a watershed to the rain event. In addition, due to the spatial changes of precipitation in an area, this complexity increases. In this research, the rainfall and runoff model is analyzed with the help of statistical methods and multivariate regression. The purpose of this study predict the inflow to Amirkabir Dam using multivariate regression methods and artificial intelligence (AI) methods, including the network model. It is an artificial neural network (ANN).
 
Materials and Methods
To investigate the relationship between rainfall and runoff and to estimate the water entering the dam due to the rainfall upstream of the watershed, the rainfall of all the stations of the watershed upstream was received. The 7-year statistics of Karaj river flow (2016-2022) were used. After checking the rainfall data of the upstream stations, the homogeneity of the data was checked and the stations that had a suitable correlation in terms of climate were selected. At this stage, stations with appropriate conditions were selected by using factor analysis between upstream precipitation and runoff and water entering the dam downstream of the watershed. Then, to more properly analyze the relationship between rainfall and runoff, two-day and three-day cumulative rainfall at the selected stations was calculated. Then, the relationship between rainfall and runoff to the dam was investigated using statistical methods of multivariable regression and artificial intelligence. To get more accurate results, different seasons of the year were divided and the relationship between rainfall and runoff entering the dam in different seasons was investigated. Error statistics were calculated for calibration and verification during the test and training period. Finally, the final analysis of the data and the prediction of the runoff entering the dam was estimated using the upstream rainfall.
 
Results and Discussion
Determining the effective stations in the runoff generation entering the dam as well as the delay time of their precipitation was achieved using multivariable regression and four stations of Nesa, Sira, Shahristanak, and Amirkabir Dam., the model of the volume of inflow to the dam, and precipitation in the catchment area of Amirkabir Dam. The coefficient of determination (R2) of the calibrated model was calculated as 76%, which is an acceptable coefficient in the relationship between precipitation and runoff. Based on the calibration and validation models of rainfall-runoff evaluation of rainfall forecasting models in July 2022, good rains are predicted for the watershed of Amir Kabir Dam. The rain system entered the country on July 28th and 29th and until July 31th it had relatively good coverage in the whole country, and on August 1st and 2nd this system weakened and only operates in limited parts of the country such as the Amir Kabir watershed. The results of evaluating the performance of the models with indicators such as coefficient of explanation (R2), mean absolute value of error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) showed that the ANN model in both calibration (training) and validation (testing) stages ) has performed better than the multivariate regression model. The accuracy indices of the model for the ANN model training stage were equal to R2=0.77 and RMSE=0.27 m3 s-1, while these indices for the testing stage were equal to R2=0.87 and RMSE=0.46 m3 s-1. It indicates the better performance of the ANN model.
 
Conclusion
The research results of this article showed that due to the presence of 5 rain gauge stations in the catchment area of Amir Kabir Dam, all the stations can not have the same effect on the water entering the dam. Using the cluster cluster method, the effect of all the stations on the inflow to Amirkabir Dam was investigated and suitable rain gauge stations were selected. Also, the results showed that the relationship between the rainfall of the watershed and the runoff entering the Amirkabir dam is different in different seasons and it has the highest correlation in the winter season because it is less affected by other factors affecting the runoff of the basin, including water from melting snow or thunderstorms. One of the other results of this study was that the calibrated and validated model had a slightly higher yield in the three seasons of winter, spring, and autumn, and a slightly lower yield in the autumn season.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Alvisi, S., Mascellani, G., Franchini, M., & Bardossy, A. (2006). Water level forecasting through fuzzy logic and artificial neural network approaches. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(1), 1-17. doi:10.5194/hess-10-1-2006, 2006.
Anvari, S., Moghaddasi, M., & Bagheri, M.H. (2023). Drought mitigation through a hedging-based model of reservoir-farm systems considering climate and streamflow variations. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 152, 723–737. doi:10.1007/s00704-023-04402-7
Anvari, S., Rashedi, E., & Lotfi, S. (2022). A coupled metaheuristic algorithm and artificial intelligence for long-lead stream flow forecasting. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 12(1), 91-104.‎ http://ijoce.iust.ac.ir/article-1-506-en.html
ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, (2000). Artificial neural networks in hydrology, I: preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5(2), 115-123. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/50701000/cswq-0332-hjelmfelt.pdf
Azarpira, F., & Shahabi, S. (2021). Evaluating the capability of hybrid data-driven approaches to forecast monthly streamflow using hydrometric and meteorological variables. Journal of Hydroinformatics23(6), 1165-1181. doi:10.2166/hydro.2021.105
Bani Naeimeh, S., Lashkari, H., Ghorbanian, J., & Morshedi, J. (2023). Synoptic analysis of extremely heavy rains and its effect on the peak discharge of Dez river floods (floods of 1993 and 2005). Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 3(3), 37-55 doi:10.22098
/mmws.2022.11216.1107 [In Persian].
Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., & Bobée, B. (2000). Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. Journal of Hydrology, 230(3-4), 244-257. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00214-6
Mirzania, E., Malek Ahmadi, H., Yadegar Shahmohammadi, Y., & Ebrahimzadeh, A. (2021). Impact of wavelet on accuracy of estimated models in rainfall-runoff modeling (Case study: Sufichay). Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 1(3), 67-79 doi:10.22098/mmws.2021.9335.1035. [In Persian]
Moghaddasi, M., Anvari, S., & Akhondi, N. (2022). A trade-off analysis of adaptive and non-adaptive future optimized rule curves based on simulation algorithm and hedging rules. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 148(1-2), 65-78. doi:10.1007/s00704-022-03930-y
Momeneh, S. (2022). Performance comparison of Artificial Intelligence models with IHACRES model in daily streamflow modeling. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 2(3), 1-16 doi:10.22098/mmws.2022.9972.1076 [in Persian].
MahdiNasab, M., Negaresh, H., & Tavousi, T. (2015). Modeling of rainfall-runoff Kashkan River catchment based on statistical models. Geography and Environmental Planning: 26(2), 67-84 dor:20.1001.1.20085362.1394.26.2.5.6 [In Persian].
Poormohammadi S., & Javadianzadeh, M.M. (2018). Comparing the efficiency of artificial intelligence methods and the HEC-HMS conceptual model in estimating the increase in resources due to cloud fertilization. The 7th National Conference on Water Resources Management of Iran, Yazd, Iran, Pp1-10. [In Persian].
Rezai Haruni, A., Zare Bidaki, R., & Pourmohammadi, S., (2021) Predicting the effect of cloud seeding on runoff in Beheshtabad watershed using IHACRES model. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 74(4), 905-916 doi:10.22059/
jrwm.2022.295490.1450 [In Persian].
Saghafian, B., Anvari, S., & Morid, S. (2013). Effect of southern oscillation index and spatially distributed climate data on improving the accuracy of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy in ference system and K-Nearest Neighbour streamflow forecasting models. Expert System 30(4), 367-380. doi:10.1111/exsy.12009
Sajikumar, N., & Thandaveswara, B.S. (1999). A non-linear rainfall–runoff model using an artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 216(1-2), 32-55. doi:10.1016/
S0022-1694(98)00273-X
Xiang, Z., Yan, J., & Demir, I. (2020). A Rainfall-runoff model with LSTM-Based sequence-to-sequence learning. Water Resources Research, 56(1), doi:10.1029/2019WR025326.
Zoratipour, A., Salajegheh, A., & Al-Maali, N., & Asgari, M.H. (2009). Investigation of rainfall-runoff model using artificial neural network and statistical bivariate regression methods (case study in Minab watershed). Watershed Management Research (Pajouhesh-Va-Sazandegi), 22(2), 69-74 doi:10.3390/ECWS-7-14232 [In Persian].