Evaluation of AquaCrop model for simulation of Wheat plant (Triticum) yield under different scenarios of agricultural management in Qazvin

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D., Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Associated Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering Research, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Shiraz, Iran

4 Professor, Irrigation and Soil Physics Department, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research and Education Organization, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The agriculture sector, as the biggest consumer of water to produce more food, has faced the challenge of water shortage. One of the problems ahead in the agricultural industry is the sustainable use of available resources such as land, water, and labor to increase agricultural production and development, which requires proper planning and management policies. Plant models can be used to investigate the long-term effects of quantitative and qualitative changes in irrigation water on crops, soil salinity, evaporation and transpiration, deep infiltration, and surface runoff. One of the widely used plant models is the AquaCrop model, which was presented and developed by the World Food and Agriculture Organization. The Aquacrop model is one of the crop yield estimation models that can be used for a wide range of crops including fodder crops, vegetables, grains, fruits, oil crops, and tubers. In this model, the state of various stresses including water and soil salinity, simulation of lack of irrigation, and crop yield are considered. Various studies have been conducted regarding the calibration and validation of crop forecasting models in our country, and much research has been conducted on wheat at the global level. In this research, the AquaCrop model was used to predict the biomass and grain yield of wheat in Qazvin. This model can be a good substitute for field measurements and can be used in areas where there is a lack of ground information.
 
Materials and Methods
In the present research, the data of water wheat cultivation in a lysimeter in Ismailabad, Qazvin were used. The input information of the AquaCrop model includes information on climate, soil, management, and plant characteristics. To calibrate and verify the model, some farm information was needed to be compared with the output of the AquaCrop model. The biomass of the wheat plant was determined by taking random samples of the 0.5×0.5 m2 with two replications per sampling hectare. To measure grain yield in the fields, four samples were taken at the end of the growing season at the end stage. The validated AquaCrop model was used to estimate the effect of three planting dates and three low irrigation conditions on wheat grain yield. In this step, the average regional information around the farms was used so that the implementation of the model is not unique to the conditions of a particular farm.
 
Results and Discussion
In terms of the investigated meteorological factors, the model has moderate sensitivity to maximum and minimum temperature and low sensitivity to rainfall. The change in the maximum temperature in this region increases the error of the simulation on average. Regarding the soil parameters, the sensitivity of the model to the crop capacity moisture, wilting point, saturated moisture, and saturated hydraulic conductivity, especially in saturated conditions, is low to medium. The most sensitive of the AquaCrop model was the change in the reference harvest index. The model simulated biomass values with higher accuracy than yield. In the calibration stage, the values CRM, NRMSE, and d for biomass were -0.15, 0.17, and 92% respectively. These values were obtained in the validation stage for biomass -0.1, 0.24, and 92 % respectively, and for yield -0.03, 0.06, and 80 % respectively. By running the model in different climatic scenarios, it was determined that the maximum delay in the planting date is on November 15. A 25% reduction in irrigation water reduced grain yield in wet, normal, and dry years by 15%, 20%, and 28 %, respectively, and a 50 % reduction in irrigation water reduced its amount by 20, 25, and 45 %, respectively.
 
Conclusion
Evaluation of the AquaCrop model for common plants in a region plays an important role in comparing crop performance in different conditions. In this research, the ability of AquaCrop 6 model to estimate the yield and biomass of wheat in Ismailabad Qazvin was investigated. The results showed that the model is capable of simulating these factors with high accuracy. The accuracy of the model in biomass simulation was higher than the grain yield. By implementing the calibrated model in different climatic scenarios, planting dates, and irrigation deficits in two regions, it was determined that to achieve optimal performance, the wheat planting date should not exceed 15 November. It was the use of calibration coefficients by spending a long time in the AquaCrop model so that a calibrated model can be used in many areas with proper accuracy. More accuracy in the simulated results can be achieved by using more calibration factors, but it is clear that the use of more calibration factors requires spending more time and money. Finding a general recalibrated model that can be used in large areas is a good solution in crop management at the farm-to-regional scale. Comparing the statistical parameters obtained in this study with previous studies on wheat yield modeling by the AquaCrop model shows that the results of this study are within an acceptable range.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Ababaei B., Abraha B., & Ramzani-Etedali H. )2017(. Water footprint assessment of main cereals in Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 179(30), 401-411. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.016
Alizadeh, H.A., Nazari, B., Parsinejad, M., Ramzani Etedali, H., & Janbaz, H. (2010). AquaCrop evaluation in deficit irrigation in Karaj. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 4, 273-283. [In Persian]
Abi-Saab, M.T., Todorovic, M., & Albrizio, R. (2014). Comparing AquaCrop and CropSyst models in simulating barley growth and yield under different water and nitrogen regimes. Does calibration year influence the performance of crop growth models?. Agriultural Water Management, 147, 21-33. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.08.001
Abrha, B., Delbecque, N., Raes, D., Tsegay, A., Todorovic, M., Heng, L., Vanutrecht, E., Geerts, S., Garcia-Vila, M., & Deckers, S. (2012). Sowing strategies for barley (Hordeum Vulgare) based on modelled yield response to water with AquaCrop. Experimental Agriculture, 48(2), 252-271. doi;10.1017/S0014479712000166
Ahmadi, K., Gholizadeh, H., Ebadzadeh, H., Kazemian, A., Hoseinpur, R., Rafiee, M., & Abdeshah, H. (2017). Iran agricultural statistics. Ministry of agriculture, IT center, from http://www. amar.maj.ir. [In Persian]
Amiri, E., Bahrani, A., Khorsand, A., & Haghjoo, M. (2016). Evaluating AquaCrop model performance to predict grain yield and wheat biomass, under water stress. Water and Soil Knowledge, 25(4/2), 217-229. [In Persian]
Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Steduto, P., Mazraeh, H., Barati, M.E., Barati, M.A., & Rahnama, A. (2011). Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 100, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.023
Anjum Iqbal, M., Shen, Y., Stricevic, R., Pei, H., Sun, H., Amiri, E., Penas, A., Penas, A., & Rio, S. (2014). Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agricultural Water Management, 135, 61-72. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.012
Araya, A., Kisseka, I., & Holman, J. (2016). Evaluating deficit irrigation management strategies for grain sorghum using AquaCrop. Irrigation Science, 34(6), 465-481. doi:10.1007/s00271-016-0515-7
Ebrahimipak, N.A., Egdernezhad, A., & Khodadadi Dehkordi, D. (2018). Evaluation of AquaCrop Model to Simulate Corn Yield under Water deficit and Superabsorbent application. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 8(31), 166-184. [In Persian]
Farahani H.J., Izzi, G., & Oweis, T.Y. (2009). Parameterization and evaluation of FAO AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), 469-476. doi:10.2134. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0182s
Garcia-Vila, M., Fereres, M., Mateos, E., & L. Orgaz. (2009). Deficit irrigation optimization of cotton with AquaCrop. Agricultural Journal, 101(3), 477-487. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0179s
Golabi, M., & Naseri A.A. (2016). Evaluating AquaCrop model performance to predict sugarcane yield and soil salinity, under water stress. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 46(4), 685-694. doi:10.22059/ijswr.2015.56792. [In Persian]
Hassanli, M., Afrasiab, P., & Ebrahimian, H. (2015). Evaluation of AquaCrop vs SALTMED Models to Estimate Crop Yield and Soil Salinity. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 46(3), 487-498. doi:10.22059/ijswr.2015.56738
Hussein, F., Janat, M., & Yakoub, A. (2011). Simulating cotton yield response to defcit irrigation with the FAO AquaCrop model. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(4), 1319-1330. doi:10.5424/sjar/20110904-358-10
Jorenush, M.H., Broomand Nasab, S., Naseri, A.A., Pakparvar, M., & Taghvaeian, S. (2019). AquaCrop evaluation to simulate wheat production and plantig date in Fars province. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 9(1), 95-107. doi:10.22059/jwim.2019.287266.701. [In Persian]
Khalili, N., Davari, K., Alizadeh, A., Kafi, M., & Ansari, H. (2014). Simulation of rainfed wheat yield using AquaCrop model, Case Study: Sisab Rainfed Researches Station, Northern Khorasan. Journal of Water And Soil, 28(5), 930-939. doi:10.22067/jsw.v0i0.34927 [In Persian]
Khorsand, A., Verdinejad, V.R., & Shahidi, A. (2014). Evaluating AquaCrop model performance to predict wheat grain yield, moisture and soil salinity, under salinity and water stress. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 4(1), 89-104. doi:10.22059/jwim.2014.51640 [in Persian]
Kim, D., & Kaluarachchi, J. (2015). Validating FAO AquaCrop using landsat images and regional crop information. Agricultural Water Management, 149, 143-155. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.013
Kumar, P., Sarangi, A., Singh, D.K., & Parihar S.S. (2014). Evaluation of AquaCrop model in predicting wheat yield and productivity under irrigated saline regimes. Irrigation and Drainage, 63, 474–487. doi:10.1002/ird.1841
Mkhabela, M.S., & Bullock, P.R. (2012). Performance of the FAO AquaCrop model for wheat grain yield and soil moisture simulation in Western Canada. Agricultural Water Management, 110, 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.009
Mohammadi, M., Ghahraman, B., Davari, K., Ansari, H., & Shahidi, A. (2015). Validation of AquaCrop model performance to simulate winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency, under water and salinity stress. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 29(1), 67-84. doi:10.22092/jwra.2015.103054. [In Persian]
Neysi, K., Egdernezhad, A., & Abbasi, F. (2023). Optimizing the consumption and distribution of nitrogen fertilizer for corn plants using response surface modeling. Water and Soil Management Modelling, 3(4), 60-76. doi:10.22098/mmws.2022.10969.1093. [In Persian]
Paredes, P., Alves, I., & Pereira, L.S. (2014). Assessing the performance of the FAO AquaCrop model to estimate maize yield and water use under full and deficit irrigation with focus on model parameterization. Agricultural Water Management, 144, 81-97. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.06.002
Paredes, P., Wei, Z., Liu, Y., Xu, D., Xin, Y., Zhang, B., & Pereira, L.S. (2015). Performance assessment of the FAO AquaCrop model for soil water, soil evaporation, biomass and yield of soybean in north china plain. Agricultural Water Management, 152, 57-71. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.12.007
Pereira, L.S., Paula, P., Rodrigues, G.C., & Neves, M. (2015). Modeling malt barley water use and evapotranspiration partitioning in two contrasting rainfall years. Assessing AquaCrop and SIMDualKc models. Agriculture Water Management, 159, 239-254. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.006
Salemi, H., Mohd Soom, M.A., Lee, T.S., Mousavi, S.F., Ganji, A., & KamilYusoff, M. (2011). Application of AquaCrop model in deficit irrigation management of Winter wheat in arid region. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 610, 2204-2215. doi:10.5897/AJAR10.1009
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Raes, D., & Fereres, E. (2009). AquaCrop- The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water. Agronomy Journal, 101, 426-437. doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0139s
Talbot, G. (2014). Relative yield composition: A method for understanding behavior of complex crop models. Environmental Modelling and Software, 51,136-148. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.017
Tavakkoli, A.A., Mahdavi, M., & Sepaskhah, A.R. (2015). Evaluation of the AquaCrop model for barley production under deficit irrigation and rainfed condition in Iran. Agricuitural Water Management, 161, 136-146. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.020
Toumi, J., Er-Raki, S., Ezzahar, J., Khabba, S., Jarlan, L., & Chehbouni, A. (2016). Performance assessment of AquaCrop model for estimating evapotranspiration, soil water content and grain yield of winter wheat in Tensift Al Haouz (Morocco): Application to irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management, 163, 219-236. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.007