Investigating the performance of the differential evolution algorithm in estimating soil hydraulic parameters

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Professor/ Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

2 Former Ph.D. Student/ Department of Soil Engineering and Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Associate Professor/ Department of Water Engineering and Researcher, Department of Drought and Climate Change, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

4 Associate Professor/ Department of Natural Engineering, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Shirvan Faculty of Agriculture, Bojnord University, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The soil water curve is one of the most critical soil hydraulic characteristics. This characteristic is used to determine soil water in the field capacity point and the permanent wilting point (PWP) beside it has a vital role in the application of soil water models in the study of soil-plant-water relationships. This curve is known as the quality soil index which has an effective role in the explanation of agricultural, ecological, and environmental problems. Impressive and efficient management of soil and water resources, water flow and solute transport survey, soil pollution, and contaminant leakage into water sources are dependent upon the accurate estimation of soil water curve parameters. Moreover, this index has a functional role in applying numerical and hydrological models. On the other hand, to better identify and understand its role, different models were provided to describe this curve mathematically. The efficiency of these models depended on the accuracy of estimated parameters in the model structure that was defined. Soil water curve is known as a non-linear relationship that is used to describe the relation between soil and water content or degree of soil saturation. The soil water curve provides essential information for using irrigation methods and about soil resistance and soil mechanical properties. In this research, the performance trend of two meta-heuristic algorithms, including the differential evolution (DE) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), was studied to estimate hydraulic parameters of soil water curves based on the van Genuchten and the Brooks and Cory models in four soil texture classes; loam, silt loam, sandy loam, and sandy clay loam. Besides, this study evaluated the performance of the meta-heuristic algorithm to RETC software. This software has a non-linear square local algorithm. This study can evaluate the ability of the meta-heuristic algorithms to estimate parameters for exponential relationships and nonlinear models.
 
Materials and Methods
At the agricultural farm of the University of Birjand, a study was conducted to analyze soil water content in different texture classes. The research involved the random selection of four soil texture classes and the random sampling of 20 points from each class. The soil water content was measured using a sandbox and pressure plate device, covering a broad suction range of 0-15000 cm. In the first phase, soil water curve parameters were estimated for each soil texture using the van Genuchten model and the Brooks and Cory model in the RETC software. Subsequently, the Matlab desktop environment was utilized to apply meta-heuristic algorithms (DE and PSO) to estimate the soil water curve parameters based on the two models. An objective function was defined to minimize the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the meta-heuristic algorithms' performance. Finally, the study compared the performance of the meta-heuristic algorithms (DE and PSO) with the RETC software in estimating soil water curve parameters based on the van Genuchten and Brooks and Cory models, using statistical indices such as RMSE and R2. The soil texture classes play a crucial role in influencing soil water content and nutrient retention, making them an essential factor in agricultural management and crop suitability. The study's findings can contribute to a better understanding of soil water dynamics and the development of improved agricultural practices.
 
Results and Discussion
The obtained results of the statistical indices (RMSE and R2) showed that the least value of RMSE was acquired by the differential evolution algorithm (DE) performance. The values of RMSE during the application of the DE algorithm as an estimated method based on the van Genuchten model were 0.0008, 0.0005,0.0004, and 0.0006 also based on the Brooks and Cory were 0.006, 0.006, 0.005, and 0.0005 in sandy clay loam, sandy loam, loam, and silt loam respectively. Also, the highest value of the R2 index was obtained equal to 0.995, 0.996, 0.994, and 0.994 by the utilization of the DE algorithm based on the van Genuchten model in the sandy clay loam, sandy loam, loam, and silt loam respectively. The values of RMSE by the utilization of the PSO algorithm based on the van Genuchten model were 0.0021, 0.006, 0.0057, and 0.006 in the sandy clay loam, sandy loam, loam, and silt loam classes respectively. The highest and lowest values of the RMSE and R2 indices by the application of RETC software were obtained equal to 0.017 and 0.912 (sandy clay loam), 0.01and 0.963 (sandy loam), 0.085 and 0.972 (loam), and 0.01 and 0.924 (silt loam) based on the van Genuchten model.
 
Conclusion
It could be concluded that RETC software has poor performance in the estimation of soil water curve parameters in all soil texture classes studied based on the van Genuchten and Brooks and Cory models. This trend represents the weakness of the local algorithms to solve multivariable problems where an exponential relationship exists between the variables and they are influenced by each other. On the other hand, the results show the meta-heuristic algorithms have sufficient ability to estimate parameters in multivariable problems. It could be concluded that the meta-heuristic algorithms have better performance in estimating the parameters of soil hydraulic models. The DE algorithm is the best method to estimate soil hydraulic parameters. The PSO algorithm has the nearest performance to the DE algorithm but the best performance to RETC. Finally, meta-heuristic algorithms are suitable options for estimating soil water curve parameters based on various hydraulic models.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Azad, N., Behmanesh, J., Rezaverdinejad, V., Abbasi, F., & Navabian, M. (2018). Developing an optimization model in drip fertigation management to consider environmental issues and supply plant requirements. Agricultural Water Management, 208, 344-356. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.030
Baram, S., Couvreur, V., Harter, T., Read, M., Brown, P.H., Kandelous, M., Smart, D.R., & Hopmans, J. W. (2016). Estimating nitrate leaching to groundwater from orchards: Comparing crop nitrogen excess, deep vadose zone data‐driven estimates, and HYDRUS modeling. Vadose Zone Journal, 15(11), 1-13. doi:10.2136/vzj2016.07.0061
Brooks, R.H., & Corey, A.T. (1964). Hydraulic properties of porous media and their relationship to drainage design Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Libraries.
Brunetti, G., Šimůnek, J., & Piro, P. (2016). A comprehensive numerical analysis of the hydraulic behavior of a permeable pavement. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 1146-1161. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.030
Du, G.M., & Zhang, Y.L. (2012). Calculate the van genuchten equation parameters based on PSO. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 31(6), 60-62.
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942-1948.
Emamgholizadeh, S., Bazoobandi, A., Mohammadi, B., Ghorbani, H., & Sadeghi, M.A. (2023). Prediction of soil cation exchange capacity using enhanced machine learning approaches in the southern region of the Caspian Sea. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(2), 76-92. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2022.101876
Etminan, S., Jalali, V., Mahmoodabadi, M., Siuki, A.K., & Bilondi, M.P. (2021a). Assessing an efficient hybrid of Monte Carlo technique (GSA-GLUE) in uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of vanGenuchten soil moisture characteristics curve. Computational Geosciences, 25, 503-514. doi:10.1007/s10596-020-10019-w
Etminan, S., Jalali, V., Mahmoodabadi, M., Khashei Siuki, A., & Pourreza Bilondi, M. (2021b). Investigating the effect of optimizing soil hydraulic parameters with inverse and parametric solution methods in increasing the accuracy of water movement simulation with HYDRUS. Applied Soil Research, 9(2), 15-30. https://asr.urmia.ac.ir/article_121061.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Gardner, W.R., Hillel, D., & Benyamini, Y. (1970). Post‐irrigation movement of soil water: 1. Redistribution. Water Resources Research, 6(3), 851-861. doi:10.1029/WR006i003p00851
Gebauer, A., Ellinger, M., Brito Gomez, V.M., & Lieb, M. (2020). Development of pedotransfer functions for water retention in tropical mountain soil landscapes: spotlight on parameter tuning in machine learning. Soil, 6(1), 215-229. doi:10.5194/soil-6-215-2020
Holzman, M.E., Carmona, F., Rivas, R., & Niclòs, R. (2018). Early assessment of crop yield from remotely sensed water stress and solar radiation data. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 145, 297-308. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.03.014
Kang, S., Hao, X., Du, T., Tong, L., Su, X., Lu, H., Li, X., Huo, Z., Li, S., & Ding, R. (2017). Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: From research to practice. Agricultural Water Management, 179, 5-17. Doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.007
Kumar, S.V., Dirmeyer, P.A., Peters-Lidard, C.D., Bindlish, R., & Bolten, J. (2018). Information theoretic evaluation of satellite soil moisture retrievals. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204, 392-400. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.016
Li, Y.B., Liu, Y., Nie, W.B., & Ma, X.Y. (2018). Inverse modeling of soil hydraulic parameters based on a hybrid of vector-evaluated genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Water, 10(1), 84. doi:10.3390/w10010084
Maggi, S. (2017). Estimating water retention characteristic parameters using differential evolution. Computers and Geotechnics, 86, 163-172. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.12.025
Maroufi, H., & Mehdinejadiani, B. (2021). A comparative study on using metaheuristic algorithms for simultaneously estimating parameters of space fractional advection-dispersion equation. Journal of Hydrology, 602, 126757. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126757
Mehdinejadiani, B., & Fathi, P. (2020). Analytical solutions of space fractional Boussinesq equation to simulate water table profiles between two parallel drainpipes under different initial conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 240, 106324. doi:10.1016/j.
agwat.2020.106324
Moazenzadeh, R., Mohammadi, B., Safari, M.J.S., & Chau, K.W. (2022). Soil moisture estimation using novel bio-inspired soft computing approaches. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 16(1), 826-840. doi:10.1080/19942060.2022.2037467
Ojha, R., Morbidelli, R., Saltalippi, C., Flammini, A., & Govindaraju, R.S. (2014). Scaling of surface soil moisture over heterogeneous fields subjected to a single rainfall event. Journal of hydrology, 516, 21-36. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol
.2014.01.057
Ou, Z. (2015). Differential evolution’s application to estimation of soil water retention parameters. Agronomy, 5(3), 464-475. doi:10.3390/
agronomy5030464
Pachepsky, Y., & Rawls, W.J. (2004). Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology. 30, Elsevier.
Pachepsky, Y., Guber, A., Jacques, D., Simunek, J., Van Genuchten, M.T., Nicholson, T., & Cady, R. (2006). Information content and complexity of simulated soil water fluxes. Geoderma, 134(3-4), 253-266. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.
2006.03.003
Ramadas, M., & Abraham, A. (2022). Segregating satellite imagery based on soil moisture level using advanced differential evolutionary multilevel segmentation. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1-6. doi: 10.1109/CEC55065.2022.9870422
Rawls, W.J., & Pachepsky, Y.A. (2002). Using field topographic descriptors to estimate soil water retention. Soil Science, 167(7), 423-435. doi:10.1097/00010694-200207000-00001
Rossi, C., & Nimmo, J.R. (1994). Modeling of soil water retention from saturation to oven dryness. Water Resources Research, 30(3), 701-708. doi:10.1029/93WR03238
Schaap, M.G., & Leij, F.J. (1998). Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil and Tillage Research, 47(1-2), 37-42. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00070-1
Schaap, M.G., Leij, F.J., & Van Genuchten, M.T. (2001). Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology, 251(3-4), 163-176. doi:10.1016/
S0022-1694(01)00466-8
Sreelash, K., Buis, S., Sekhar, M., Ruiz, L., Tomer, S.K., & Guerif, M. (2017). Estimation of available water capacity components of two-layered soils using crop model inversion: Effect of crop type and water regime. Journal of Hydrology, 546, 166-178. doi:10.1016/
j.jhydrol.2016.12.049
Storn, R. (1995). Differrential evolution-a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical report, International Computer Science Institute, 11-29. https://cse.engineering.nyu.edu/~mleung/CS909/s04/Storn95-012.pdf
Tao, H., Diop, L., Bodian, A., Djaman, K., Ndiaye, P.M., & Yaseen, Z.M. (2018). Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with firefly algorithm: Regional case study in Burkina Faso. Agricultural Water Management, 208, 140-151. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.018
Tavakoli, M., & De Smedt, F. (2013). Validation of soil moisture simulation with a distributed hydrologic model (WetSpa). Environmental Earth Sciences, 69(3), 739-747. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1957-8
Van Genuchten, M.T. (1980). A closed‐form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil science society of America journal, 44(5), 892-898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.
03615995004400050002x
Van Genuchten, M.V., Leij, F.J., & Yates, S.R. (1991). The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils.
Van Lier, Q.D.J., Pinheiro, E.A.R., & Inforsato, L. (2019). Hydrostatic equilibrium between soil samples and pressure plates used in soil water retention determination: consequences of a questionable assumption. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 43-61. doi.org/10.1590/
18069657rbcs20190014
Vereecken, H., Maes, J., Feyen, J., & Darius, P. (1989). Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristic from texture, bulk density, and carbon content. Soil Science, 148(6), 389-403. https://journals.lww.com/soilsci/abstract/1989/12000/estimating_the_soil_moisture_retention.1.aspx
Wang, J., Shi, T., Yu, D., Teng, D., Ge, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, X., Wang, H., & Wu, G. (2020). Ensemble machine-learning-based framework for estimating total nitrogen concentration in water using drone-borne hyperspectral imagery of emergent plants: A case study in an arid oasis, NW China. Environmental Pollution, 266, 412-431. doi: 10.1016/j.
envpol.2020.115412
Wang, L., Huang, C., & Huang, L. (2018). Parameter estimation of the soil water retention curve model with Jaya algorithm. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151, 349-353. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.024
Yan, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., & Xiaopeng, L. (2017). Quantifying soil hydraulic properties and their uncertainties by modified GLUE method. International Agrophysics, 31(3), 433-445. doi:10.1515/intag-2016-0056
Yin, Z.Y., Jin, Y.F., Shen, J.S., & Hicher, P.Y. (2018). Optimization techniques for identifying soil parameters in geotechnical engineering: comparative study and enhancement. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 42(1), 70-94. doi:10.1002
/nag.2714