Evaluation of water stress index and water poverty in rice production based on the water footprint concept in Iran

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student/ Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

2 Associate Professor/ Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

3 Associate Professor/ Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

4 Assistant Professor/ Department of Range and Watershed, Faculty of Natural Resources, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

5 Ph.D.,/ Department of Water Science and Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Abstract

Introduction
The increase in water demand, especially in the production of agricultural products, has led to increased competition for fresh water. Therefore, improving agricultural water productivity and reducing water stress caused by agricultural production is an important measure to improve the sustainable use of water resources. One of the most important indicators proposed for water management is the concept of water footprint, which can be used as a useful tool to measure and predict the amount of water consumed in the agricultural sector and the required demand. In addition, water stress and water poverty indicators are among the other widely used indicators to evaluate water scarcity. Iran is an arid and semi-arid country that has faced severe water shortage and this has had adverse effects on the economy, ecosystem functions, and the welfare of the country's people. The agricultural sector is one of the most important and largest consuming sectors of water resources in Iran, so more than 92% of freshwater resources are consumed in this sector, so the knowledge of water resources allocated for the production of agricultural products is important for managers. And the country's policymakers are very important. So, one of the main solutions to reduce water shortage is to reduce water consumption in the agricultural sector. Among agricultural products, rice is one of the most important food products, which feeds more than half of the world's population. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use the indicators of water footprint, water stress, and water poverty to evaluate the water scarcity of water in rice production in Iran.
 
Materials and Methods
Among the agricultural products, rice is a valuable food and the most important and widely consumed grain. The study area is the rice-producing provinces. which feeds more than half of the world's population. It accounts for about 19% of the world's dietary energy. After wheat, this product is known as one of the most important food items. The average area under rice cultivation (ha), production (ton), yield (tons/ha) as well as the necessary data and information were collected concerning the water resources available for rice production from the Ministry of Jihad Agriculture and the Water Resources Management Company of Iran. The evaluation of water footprint components, including blue, green, and gray water footprints, is based on the method provided by Hoekstra et al. (2011). The water stress index of rice is calculated as a ratio of the total water footprint in rice production to the total water resources available in the region. The amount of water poverty caused by rice production is defined by the product of the total water footprint in rice production and the value of the rice water stress index. Finally, the amount of export and import of virtual water due to rice production in Iran has been estimated.
 
Results and Discussion
On average, the total footprint of rice is 3037 m-3 t and the total volume resulting from its production is 4313 MCM, with the share of blue, green, and gray water footprints being 91.68, 6.93, and 1.39 %, respectively. The available water resources (AWR) for rice production in the producing provinces are 21,992 MCM, of which 6,872 and 15,210 MCM are related to blue water and green water, respectively. The results of the investigation of the water stress index (RWSI) caused by rice cultivation in Iran, which is the result of dividing the total water footprint in rice production by the available water resources, is on average equal to 0.5 (out of 1.9), which shows Iran is in moderate water stress of rice production. Changes in water stress in rice production on a provincial scale showed that the provinces of Qazvin, Zanjan, Isfahan, North Khorasan, Razavi Khorasan, and Sistan and Baluchistan have water stress with a value between 0.6 and 1.2 are high and very high water stress in rice production, while the provinces of Mazandaran, Guilan, Golestan, Fars, and Khuzestan are in the range of less than 0.3 (low water stress) Also, the water poverty caused by rice production is equal to 1073 MCM in Iran, which is the highest and lowest amount of water poverty in Guilan and Khuzestan provinces (290 and 11 MCM).
 
Conclusion
Water sustainability in rice production in Iran has been investigated using water stress, water poverty, and water footprint, as well as the amount of exports and imports. Among the components of the water footprint, the highest value is related to the blue water footprint, and the lowest is related to the green water footprint. The high blue water footprint shows that most of the surface water and groundwater is used for rice production, and the low green water footprint shows that the amount of rainfall is not enough for rice cultivation in Iran. According to the results, the amount of gray water footprint in rice production is more than the green water footprint, this issue shows that the low yield of rice in the studied provinces as well as the high consumption of fertilizers and chemical pesticides cause the increase of gray water footprint in rice has been produced. Assessing water scarcity using the water footprint approach can be useful for identifying the risks of high rice production due to the potential of water scarcity. The dependence and high consumption of blue water compared to green water have increased the water shortage related to the production of rice. Therefore, it is necessary to change the pattern of water resource allocation based on the status of water resources and water scarcity indicators.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Abdollahzadeh Kahrizi, R., Kokabinezhad Moghaddam, A.H., & Merufinia, E. (2022). Investigating virtual water content and physical and economic water productivity indicators in crops (Case study: Moghan irrigation network, Ardabil province). Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 3(1), 54–68. doi: 10.22098/MMWS.2022.11090.1100. [In Persian]
Bagamba, F., Bashaasha, B., Claessens, L., Antle, J., & Economics, R. (2012). Assessing climate change impacts and adaptation strategies for smallholder agricultural systems in Uganda. In: Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies for Smallholder Agricultural Systems in Uganda, 20(2), 303–316. http://www.bioline.org.br/pdf?cs12047
Bazrafshan, O., & Dehghanpir, S.H. (2020). Application of water footprint, virtual water trade and water footprint economic value of citrus fruit productions in Hormozgan Province, Iran. Sustainable Water Resources Management6(6), 1-10.‏ doi: 10.1007/s40899-020-00473-w
Bazrafshan, O., Zamani, H., Etedali, H.R., & Dehghanpir, S. (2019). Assessment of citrus water footprint components and impact of climatic and non-climatic factors on them. Scientia Horticulturae250, 344-351.‏  doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.069
Cao, X.C., Mengyang, W., Xiangping, G., Yalian, Z., Yan, G., Nan, W., & Weiguang, W. (2017). Assessing water scarcity in agricultural production system based on the generalized water resources and water footprint framework. Science of the Total Environment609, 587-597.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.191
Cao, X.C., Wu, P.T., Wang, Y.B., & Zhao, X.N. (2014). Assessing blue and green water utilisation in wheat production of China from the perspectives of water footprint and total water use. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences18(8),3165-3178.‏ doi: 10.5194/hess-18-3165-2014
Cao, X., Huang, X., Huang, H., Liu, J., Guo, X., Wang, W., & She, D. (2018). Changes and driving mechanism of water footprint scarcity in crop production: A study of Jiangsu Province, China. Ecological Indicators95, 444-454.‏ doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.059
Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Savenije, H.H., & Gautam, R. (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecological Economics60(1), 186-203.‏  doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
Ebrahimi Mahmoudi, H., Pishvaei, M.S., & Teymouri, E. (2021). A two-stage model for rice cultivation preparation considering dynamic uncertainty: A case study in Iran. Industrial Management Perspective. 11(42), 145- 176. doi:10.52547/jimp.11.2.145. [In Persian]
Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Müller, C., Frieler, K., Konzmann, M., Gerten, D., Glotter, M., Flörke, M., Wada, Y., Best, N., Eisner, S., Fekete, B., Folberth, C., Foster, I., Gosling, S., Haddeland , I., Khabarov, N., Ludwig, F., Masaki, Y., Olin, S., Rosenzweig, C., Ruane, A., Satoh, Y., Schmid, E., Stacke, T., Tang, Q., & Wisser, D. (2014). Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 2014, 111, 3239–3244. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222474110
Falkenmark, M. (2001). The greatest water problem: the inability to link environmental security, water security and food security. International Journal of Water Resources Development17(4), 539-554.‏ doi:10.1080/07900620120094073
Falkenmark, M., Lundqvist, J., & Widstrand, C.              (1989). Macro‐scale water scarcity requires micro‐scale approaches: Aspects of vulnerability in semi‐arid development. Natural resources forum a nations sustainable development journal. 13(4), 258–267.  doi: 10.1111/j.14778947.1989.tb00348.x
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2010). Bioenergy and Food Security. The BEFS Analytical Framework. FAO:Rome,Italy.https://www.fao.org/3/i1544e/i1544e00.htm
Fu, H., Chen, Y., Yang, X., Di, J., Xu, M., & Zhang, B. (2019). Water resource potential for large-scale sweet sorghum production as bioenergy feedstock in Northern China. Science of The Total Environment653, 758-764.‏ doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.402
Gerbens-Leenes, P.W., Mekonnen, M.M., & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2012). The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: A comparative study in different countries and production systems. Water Resources and Industry1, 25-36.‏  doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2013.03.001
Gilani, A., Absalan, S., Jalali, S., & Behbahani, L. (2019). The effect of sprinkler irrigation on grain yield, yield components and water use efficiency of rice cultivars under drill-seed cultivation in Khuzestan. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 42(2),63-73.
        doi: 10.22055/jise.2017.19659.1409
Hanafiah, M.M., Ghazali, N.F., Harun, S.N., Abdulaali, H., AbdulHasan, M.J., & Kamarudin, M.K.A. (2019). Assessing water scarcity in Malaysia: a case study of rice production. Desalination and Water Treatment149, 274-287.‏ doi: 10.5004/dwt.2019.
23841
Hoekstra, A.Y., & Chapagain, A.K. (2007). The water footprints of Morocco and the Netherlands: Global water use as a result of domestic consumption of agricultural commodities. Ecological Economics64(1), 143-151.‏  doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.023
Hoekstra, A.Y., & Hung, P.Q. (2005). Globalisation of water resources: international virtual water flows in relation to crop trade. Global Environmental Change15(1), 45-56.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.06.004
Hoekstra, A.Y., & Mekonnen, M.M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109(9), 3232-3237.‏ doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109936109
Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K., Aldaya, M.M., & Mekonnen, M.M. (2011). The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Routledge.‏ doi: 10.4324/9781849775526
IWR, )2021(. Iran Water Resources Management Company, Tehran [In Persian].
Liu, J., Yang, H., Gosling, S.N., Kummu, M., Flörke, M., Pfister, S., & Oki, T. (2017). Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future. Earth's Future5(6), 545-559.‏ doi:10.1002/2016EF000518
Madani, K. (2014). Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences4(4), 315-328.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z
Madani, K., AghaKouchak, A., & Mirchi, A. (2016). Iran’s socioeconomic drought: challenges of a water-bankrupt nation. Iranian Studies49(6), 997-1016.‏ doi: 10.1080/00210862.2016.1259286
MAJ, (2021). Iran Agriculture Bulletin. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, Agriculture Jihad Press, Tehran [In Persian],
Mengran, F., Bin, G., Weijiao, W., Juan, W., Lihua, Z., & Jianlin, W. (2019). Comprehensive assessment of water footprints and water scarcity pressure for main crops in Shandong Province, China. Sustainability11(7), 1856.   doi: 10.3390/su11071856
Pfister, S., Koehler, A., & Hellweg, S. (2009). Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environmental Science & Technology43(11), 4098-4104.‏  doi: 10.1021/es802423e
Ramazani, A., & Dehghani, M. (2021). Application of trickle irrigation (T-tape) in dry direct- seeded rice (Case study of Lenjan region of Isfahan). Iranian Water Researches Journal, 15(2), 119-127.  https://iwrj.sku.ac.ir/article_
10773.html?lang=en
Ramezani Etedali, H., Ahmadaali, K., Gorgin, F., & Ababaei, B. (2019). Optimization of the cropping pattern of main cereals and improving water productivity: application of the water footprint concept. Irrigation and Drainage68(4),765-777.    doi: 10.1002/ird.2362
Raskin, P., Gleick, P., Kirshen, P., Pontius, G., & Strzepek, K. (1997). Water futures: assessment of long-range patterns and problems. Comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world. Stockholm Environment Institute .‏ https://www.sei.org/publications/water-futures-assessment-long-range-patterns-problems-2/
Rezaei, G., Khaledian, M., Kavoosi-Kalashami, M., & Rezaei, M. (2021). Comparison of water productivity indices and virtual water in major rice producing provinces in Iran. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage15(3), 634-644. dor: 20.1001.1.20087942.1400.15.3.13.7 [In Persian]
Shekhawat, K., Rathore, S.S., & Chauhan, B.S. (2020). Weed management in dry direct-seeded rice: A review on challenges and opportunities forsustainable rice production. Agronomy10(9), 1264.        https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/9/1264
Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S.H., Mungkung, R., Nilsalab, P., Lecksiwilai, N., & Sawaengsak, W. (2017). Implications of water use and water scarcity footprint for sustainable rice cultivation. Sustainability, 9, 2283.   doi: 10.3390/su9122283
Sullivan, C. (2002). Calculating a water poverty index. World development30(7), 1195-1210.‏  doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9
Vafaei, K., Bazrafshan, O., & Ramezanietedali, H. (2020). Spatial and temporal changes of ecological water footprint and virtual water trade in irrigated and rain-fed almond production at Iran. Journal of water and Soil Science, 24(2), 287–302. [In Persian]. http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-3933-fa.html
Uma Gowri, M., & Shivakumar, K.M. (2021) . India rice export and virtual water trade. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 13(SI), 43-46. doi:10.31018/jans.v13iSI.2775
Wang, Y.B., Wu, P.T., Engel, B.A., & Sun, S.K. (2015). Comparison of volumetric and stress-weighted water footprint of grain products in China. Ecological Indicators48, 324-333.‏ doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.014
Zhai, Y., Shen, X., Quan, T., Ma, X., Zhang, R., Ji, C., & Hong, J. (2019). Impact-oriented water footprint assessment of wheat production in China. Science of the Total Environment689, 90-98.‏  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.262