Assessing the hydraulic parameter’s uncertainty of the HYDRUS model using DREAM method

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student/ Department of Soil Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Associate Professor/ Department of Nature Engineering, Shirvan Faculty of Agriculture, Bojnord University, Bojnord, Iran

3 Professor/ Department of Soil Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

4 Professor/ Department of Water Engineering, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

5 Associate Professor/ Department of Water Engineering, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The accuracy and efficiency of the analytical and numerical models to describe water flow in soil, in unsaturated environments are affected by input data uncertainty, model structure uncertainty, and hydraulic required parameters by the model. Parameter uncertainty has an impact on the model simulation by displaying uncertainty in the simulation results. Hence, the quantitative assessment of the parameter uncertainty and its influence on the model simulation is important in reducing simulation uncertainty. The Bayesian method is a common method for uncertainty analysis that has widespread application in science and engineering to reconcile the concepts of model structure with data (assimilation of input and model outputs, and inference of the parameters). Therefore, a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm based on the Bayesian inference to improve the computational efficiency of the analysis was used. The DREAM algorithm is one of the adaptive methods, the Markov chain sampling method which is known as an effective method in used soil-water models due to searching in vast space and solving complex models with a large number of variables. In addition, one of the main problems in using Bayesian inference for hydrological models is their nonlinear relations and using them in heterogenic conditions, DREAM algorithm has been developed to use Bayesian analysis in soil-water problems. Hence, this study has taken the efficiency of the DREAM algorithm as a global optimization method and convergence parser in sampling chain paths and posterior distribution of parameters. The HYDRUS model is a hydraulic model to study the soil-water processes that include nonlinear equations. In addition, center pivot irrigation is a modern method of water management that need to study using hydraulic models under various conditions. Hence, the main purpose of this article is assessment the role of the management method and environmental prevailing conditions in the uncertainty of hydraulic parameters and model structure in estimating water flow under a center pivot irrigation system in four-year alfalfa cultivation.
 
Materials and Methods
The profile was dug at 120 cm depth. The soil profile was divided into three layers and two soil texture classes. The physical-chemical soil properties were studied in each layer. Assessment of soil properties stated that exists a heterogeneous layer in this soil profile. TDR was used to measure soil water content before, after, and during every irrigation period. Soil water content was measured from 10 June to 11 September 2018 consecutively. The van Genuchten-Mualem equation was used to estimate soil hydraulic parameters and describe water flow in the HYDRUS model. The HYDRUS model is coupled with the DREAM algorithm to evaluate parameter uncertainty and the model structure uncertainty based on measured soil water content data using TDR in every three categorized layers. In this article the p-factor, d-factor, and S and T indices were used to evaluate parameter uncertainty, the model structure uncertainty, and model performance.
 
Results and Discussion
The qualitative evaluation of soil hydraulic parameters was compiled by the posterior distributions of parameters in every three depths. The parameters had a normal distribution, the model could be recognized the value of parameters, whereas the parameters didn't have a normal distribution and had high uncertainty. The “α” parameter had high uncertainty in every three depths, in other words, in two soil texture classes, this parameter compared to other parameters had high uncertainty. Along heterogeneous soil profiles, the "α", "θs", and "n" parameters were shown high uncertainty to the Hydraulic conductivity parameter of soil saturation. The value of p-factor and d-factor were obtained equal to 83.6 and 0.13 on the soil surface and 10 and 0.14 on the subsurface soil. Reducing the p-factor index in the lower soil layers explained the overlap between measured soil water content points with estimated soil water content. So, along the soil profile could be observed high uncertainty of soil hydraulic parameters under center pivot irrigation. On the other hand, increasing the d-factor index in the sub-surface soil stated increased confidence intervals which indicate the model structure uncertainty and the poor performance of the HYDRUS model in heterogenic conditions. Also, the value of two indices of S and T were obtained 0.3 and 0.76 for the surface layer and 0.88 and 1.4 in the lower soil layers respectively. The values of S and T indices stated the ability of the DREAM algorithm to reduce parameter uncertainty and the model structure uncertainty in soil surface whereas the trend of changes in the two indices explained Asymmetry of the confidence interval with respect to the measured points and the pre-estimation of the model in the lower soil layers. Therefore, the trend of the d-factor, S and T indices showed the influence of the mathematical-physics concepts in the HYDRUS model structure in the heterogenic layer and unsaturated conditions. The research results stated the ability of the HYDRUS model in describing water flow under center pivot irrigation as a novel method of managing water sources, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. Even though, the results of the assessment indices showed decreasing model performance in the lower soil layers.
 
Conclusion
The results of soil profile indicated the effect of parameter uncertainty and the model structure uncertainty in soil moisture estimation affected by management and environmental conditions. In addition, the results showed the ability of the DREAM algorithm to simultaneously evaluate the uncertainty of the parameters and the model structure in order to increase the accuracy of the HYDRUS model under the applied conditions. Also, in this study, the DREAM algorithm indicated the role of the heterogeneous layer in parameter uncertainty and its effect on the accuracy of the model performance. The DREAM algorithm is a practical and management option to evaluate the HYDRUS model during the application of the center pivot irrigation method at the farm level. So, this is an appropriate option to study the efficiency of the HYDRUS model using modern methods in agricultural practices. Moreover, to survey the efficiency of hydraulic models under the prevailing conditions could be used the ability of the DREAM algorithm based on the Markov chain.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
 
Abbaspour, K.C., Schulin, R., & Van Genuchten, M.T. (2001). Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic parameters using ant colony optimization. Advances in Water Resources, 24(8), 827-841. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00018-5
Abedini, E., Mousavi Bayegi, M., Khashei Siuki, A., & Selahvarzi, Y. (2022). Investigating the Trend of extreme Temperature Events Based on the Fifth IPCC Report (Case Study: South Khorasan Province). Journal of Climate Research, 1400(48), 1-22.
Alam, M.S., Barbour, S.L., & Huang, M. (2020). Characterizing uncertainty in the hydraulic parameters of oil sands mine reclamation covers and its influence on water balance predictions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(2), 735-759.
Brunetti, G., Šimůnek, J., Bogena, H., Baatz, R., Huisman, J.A., Dahlke, H., & Vereecken, H. (2019). On the information content of cosmic‐ray neutron data in the inverse estimation of soil hydraulic properties. Vadose Zone Journal, 18(1), 1-24. doi:10.2136/vzj2018.06.0123
Brunetti, G., Porti, M., & Piro, P. (2018). Multi-level numerical and statistical analysis of the hygrothermal behavior of a non-vegetated green roof in a mediterranean climate. Applied Energy, 221, 204-219. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.190
Blasone, R.S. (2007). Parameter estimation and uncertainty assessment in hydrological modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Brown, J.D., & Heuvelink, G. (2006). Assessing uncertainty propagation through physically based models of soil water flow and solute transport. Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. doi:10.1002/0470848944.hsa081
Chen, S., Mao, X., Barry, D.A., & Yang, J. (2019). Model of crop growth, water flow, and solute transport in layered soil. Agricultural Water Management, 221, 160-174. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.031
Chen, G., Jiao, L., & Li, X. (2016). Sensitivity analysis and identification of parameters to the Van Genuchten equation. Journal of Chemistry. doi:10.1155/2016/9879537
Houska, T., Multsch, S., Kraft, P., Frede, H.G., & Breuer, L. (2014). Monte Carlo-based calibration and uncertainty analysis of a coupled plant growth and hydrological model. Biogeosciences, 11(7), 2069-2082. doi:    10.5194/bg-11-2069-2014
Kisekka, I., Migliaccio, K.W., Muñoz-Carpena, R., Schaffer, B., & Khare, Y. (2015). Modelling soil water dynamics considering measurement uncertainty. Hydrological Processes, 29(5), 692-711. doi:10.1002/hyp.10173
Li, X., Yang, P., Shi, H., Ren, S., Li, Y., Li, P., & Wang, C. (2013). The effect of transpiration uncertainty on root zone soil water by Bayesian analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(3-4), 691-700. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.030
Liao, K., Xu, S., Wu, J., & Zhu, Q. (2014). Uncertainty analysis for large-scale prediction of the van Genuchten soil-water retention parameters with pedotransfer functions. Soil Research, 52(5), 431-442. doi:10.1071/SR13230
Loosvelt, L., Pauwels, V.R., Cornelis, W.M., De Lannoy, G.J., & Verhoest, N.E. (2011). Impact of soil hydraulic parameter uncertainty on soil moisture modeling. Water Resources Research, 47(3), 34-50. doi:10.1029/2010WR009204
Lu, L., Jun, X., Chong-Yu, X., Jianjing, C., & Rui, W. (2009). Analysis of the sources of equifinality in hydrological models using GLUE methodology. IAHS publication, 331,130-145.
Mannschatz, T., Wolf, T., & Hülsmann, S. (2016). Nexus Tools Platform: Web-based comparison of modelling tools for analysis of water-soil-waste nexus. Environmental Modelling & Software, 76, 137-153. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.031
Mualem, Y. (1976). A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water resources research, 12(3), 513-522. doi:10.1029/WR012i003p00513
Pan, Y., Zeng, X., Xu, H., Sun, Y., Wang, D., & Wu, J. (2020). Assessing human health risk of groundwater DNAPL contamination by quantifying the model structure uncertainty. Journal of Hydrology, 584, 124690. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124690
Salahou, M.K., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Jiao, X., & Lü, H. (2022). Inverse Modelling to Estimate Soil Hydraulic Properties at the Field Scale. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. doi:10.1155/2022/4544446
Shafiei, M., Ghahraman, B., Saghafian, B., Davary, K., Pande, S., & Vazifedoust, M. (2014). Uncertainty assessment of the agro-hydrological SWAP model application at field scale: A case study in a dry region. Agricultural Water Management, 146, 324-334. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.008
Skaggs, T.H., Suarez, D.L., & Goldberg, S. (2013). Effects of soil hydraulic and transport parameter uncertainty on predictions of solute transport in large lysimeters. Vadose Zone Journal, 12(1), 1-12. doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0143
Steenpass, C., Vanderborght, J., Herbst, M., Šimůnek, J., & Vereecken, H. (2010). Estimating soil hydraulic properties from infrared measurements of soil surface temperatures and TDR data. Vadose zone journal, 9(4), 910-924. doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0176
Tu, T., Ercan, A., & Kavvas, M.L. (2019). One-dimensional solute transport in open channel flow from a stochastic systematic perspective. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 33(7), 1403-1418. doi:10.1007/s00477-019-01699-7
Vrugt, J.A., Ter Braak, C.J.F., Diks, C.G.H., Robinson, B.A., Hyman, J.M., & Higdon, D. (2009). Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulationusing self-adaptative differential evolution withrandomized subspace sampling. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and NumericalSimulation, 10, 273-290. doi:10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273
Vrugt, J.A., & Ter Braak, C.J. (2011). DREAM (D): an adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm to solve discrete, noncontinuous, and combinatorial posterior parameter estimation problems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(12), 3701-3713. doi:10.5194/hess-15-3701-2011
Wainwright, J., & Mulligan, M. (2013). Environmental modelling: finding simplicity in complexity. John Wiley & Sons.
Xiong, L., Wan, M.I.N., Wei, X., & O'connor, K.M. (2009). Indices for assessing the prediction bounds of hydrological models and application by generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation/Indices pour évaluer les bornes de prévision de modèles hydrologiques ET mise en œuvre pour une estimation d'incertitude par vraisemblance généralisée. Hydrological sciences journal, 54(5), 852-871. doi:10.1623/hysj.54.5.852
Yan, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Li, X., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Quantifying soil hydraulic properties and their uncertainties by modified GLUE method. International Agrophysics, 31(3), 433-445.doi:10.1515/intag-2016-0056