Comparison of particle size distribution of sediments in mountain and river sand and gravel mining in Urmia City

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Graduated M.Sc. Student/ Department of Watershed Management Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Associate Professor/ Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Range & Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Associate Professor/ Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Sand mines are one of the most important active mines. One of the key properties of sediments is their particle size distribution, which affects many physical and chemical properties such as hydraulic and electrical properties and characteristics related to the transportability by erosive agents. Determining the size of sediment particles in different environments can be used in reclaiming sediments from washing river and mountain sand mines for physical and chemical remediation of soil. By determining the size of sediment particles in different environments, it is possible to measure the reuse of sediments from washing river and mountain sand mines for physical and chemical remediation of soil.
Materials and Methods
The main aim of this study was to compare the capability of some mathematical models in describing particle size distribution of sediments of 26 sand mines in Urmia. For this purpose, sampling was performed from mine sedimentation ponds. By examining each of the mines, in the field surveyes of sediment ponds, sediment sampling was done. In sampling of each mine, three samples were taken from three different points of stilling pond (entrance, middle and end of the pond) in depth (approximate depth of 20 cm) and composed of sediment accumulation profiles with approximately one kilogram weight. The particle size distribution was determined by hydrometric method. In order to describe the sediments, 4 mathematical models of sediment size distribution including Weibull, Fredlund, Van genuchten and Jacky models were used. Different aspects of models performance were evaluated by some efficiency criteria.
Results and Discussion
The samples taken from mountain and river mines were in the sandy loam and loamy texture class, respectively, so they have fine to medium grain texture. The results showed the difference between the amount of particles forming river and mountain sediments and there is small difference between river and mountain sediments in terms of the amount of component particles. In mountain sediments, the amount of clay, silt and sand is much more than river sediments and the amount of sand in river sediments is more than mountain sediments. Based on the results, most of the sediments are sand, silt and very fine sand and clay, respectively. Six efficiency coefficients were used to evaluate the accuracy of sediment particle grading models. The results showed that Fredlund model had better performance in describing sediment size distribution than other models.
Conclusion
Analysis of daily, monthly, seasonal and annual trends of precipitation and minimum and maximum temperatures in the period Fredlund model has the lowest error compared to other models and increasing the number of model parameters is not a reason to increase the accuracy of the model.It is suggested that the physical and chemical properties of sediments of mountain and river sand mines be studied separately so that according to different origins and different processes involved in their formation, the feasibility of using these sediments for soil optimization can be investigated.

Keywords


Afrasiabi, F., Khodaverdiloo, H., & Asadzadeh, F. (2017). Characterizing the error structure of selected soil particle size distribution models. Journal of Water and Soil, 31(4), 1135-1147 (in Persian).
Asadzadeh, F., Jalalzadeh, S., & Samadi, A. (2017). Comparison of the physical and chemical properties of the bed and suspended sediments of the Roze-Chay River. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 24(2), 273-288 (in Persian).
Asadzadeh, F. (2018). Evaluation of prediction in some particle size distribution models for river sediments. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 31(4), 587-599 (in Persian).
Asghari Sereskanrood, S. (2005). Analyzing the effects of gravel and sand mining on the morphology of Grango River (between Sahand Dam to Khorasanak village). Hydrogeomorphology, 1, 21-39 (in Persian).
Boadu, F.K. (2000). Hydraulic conductivity of soils from grain-size distribution: new models. Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering, 126(8), 739-746.
Botula, Y.D., Cornelis, W.M., Baert, G., Mafuka, P. & Van Ranst, E. (2013). Particle size distribution models for soils of the humid tropics. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 13(4), 686-698.
Buchan, G.D., Grewal, K.S., & Robson, A.B. (1993). Improved models of particle- size distribution: An illustration of model comparison techniques. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 901- 908.
Cronican, A.E., & Gribb, M.M. (2004). Hydraulic conductivity prediction for sandy soils. Groundwater, 42(3), 459-464.
Esmaeelnejad, L., Siavashi, F., Seyedmohammadi, J., & Shabanpour, M. (2016). The best mathematical models describing particle size distribution of soils. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(4), 1-11.
Fang, Z., Patterson, B.R., & Turner Jr, M.E. (1993). Modeling particle size distributions by the Weibull distribution function. Materials Characterization, 31(3), 177-182.
Flemming, B.W. (2007). The influence of grain-size analysis methods and sediment mixing on curve shapes and textural parameters: implications for sediment trend analysis. Sedimentary Geology, 202(3), 425-435.
Fredlund, M.D., Wilson, G.W., & Fredlund, D.G. (2002). Use of the grain-size distribution for estimation of the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(5), 1103-1117.
Haverkamp, R.T., & Parlange, J.Y. (1986). Predicting the water-retention curve from particle-size distribution: 1. Sandy soils without organic matter1. Soil Sciences, 142(6), 325-339.
Hwang, S.I., Lee, K.P., Lee, D.S., & Powers, S.E. (2002). Models for estimating soil particle-size distributions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66(4), 1143-1150.
Hwang, S.I. (2004). Effect of texture on the performance of soil particle-size distribution models. Geoderma, 123(3), 363-371.
Krause, P., Boyle, D.P., & Bäse, F. (2005). Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, 5, 89-97.
Kondolf, G.M. (1994). Geomorphic and environmental effects of instream gravel mining. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28, 225-243.
Mahmoodi, Z., Bahremand, A.R., Abdollahi, Kh., Sadoddin, A., Kuhestani, Sh., & Komaki, Ch.B. (2020). Investigation of temporal and spatial variations of water balance components and hydrograph separation of Arazkouse watershed through groundwater recharge modeling using WetSpass model. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 27(1), 27-47 (in Persian).
Rastgo, M., Bayat, H., & Ebrahimi, E. (2014). The effect of textural groups on the fitting capability of soil particle size distribution curve models. Journal of Water and Soil, 28(1), 111-126 (in Persian).
Rezaee Abajelu, E., Behmanesh, J., Mohammad Nejhad, B., Zeynalzadeh, K., & Habibzadeh Azar, B. (2013). Evaluation of pedotransfer Functions in estimating saturated water content of limy soils. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 3(4), 71-82 (in Persian).
Shahnavaz, M., Charm, M., & Hasounipourzadeh, H. (2009). Study of the physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal of concentrations sediments of the Karoon river for their application in agriculture. Water and Wastewater, 20(3), 94-98 (in Persian).
Shangguan, W., Dai, Y., García-Gutiérrez, C., & Yuan, H. (2014). Particle-size distribution models for the conversion of chinese data to FAO/USDA System. The Scientific World Journal, 1-11.
Sigua, G.C., Holtcamp, M.L., & Coleman, S.W. (2004). Assessing the efficacy of degraded materials from Lakepanasoffkee, Florida: Implication to environment and agriculture- Part 2: Pasture establishment and forage productivity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 11, 394-399.
Yang, X., Lee, J., Barker, D.E., Wang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Comparison of six particle size distribution models on the goodness-of-fit to particulate matter sampled from animal buildings. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 62(6), 725-735.
Zhao, P., Shao, M.A., & Horton, R. (2011). Performance of soil particle-size distribution models for describing deposited soils adjacent to constructed dams in the China Loess Plateau. Acta Geophysica, 59(1), 124-138.
Zolfaghari, A.S., Tirgar Soltani, M.T., Yazdani, M.R., & Soleimani Sardo, E. (2014). Investigation of models for describing soil particle size distribution. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 45(2), 199-209 (in Persian).