Detecting groundwater resources potential in Isfahan Lenjanat region using weights-of-evidence model

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor/ Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, KhorramAbad, Iran

2 Assistant Professor/ Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, KhorramAbad, Iran

3 Associate Professor/ Department of New Energy and Environment, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Ph.D. Student/ Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, KhorramAbad, Iran

5 Ph.D. Student/ Department of Watershed Management Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Identifying groundwater potential is a key requirement in groundwater conservation and management and is especially useful for engineers and designers looking for suitable locations for the exploitation of these resources. GIS-based methods have increased the accuracy and speed of groundwater surveys. Many researchers have focused on the use of GIS-based methods, remote sensing and machine learning, and statistical methods. These methods identified latent patterns in groundwater and obtain a nonlinear relationship between affecting variables. In this regard, the final groundwater potential map is determined using 12 effective variables based on ArcGIS and Weight-Of-Evidence (WOE) model for Lenjanat area, Isfahan Province.
Materials and Methods
Lenjanat study area is located in the southwest of Isfahan Province. It has a variable climate that is always affected by the central semi-arid and semi-humid areas of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. WOE model is based on standard deviation and used to predict the occurrence of accidents when there is enough data available to assess the relative importance of the layers using the statistical average. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve related to the groundwater potential mapping in the Lenjanat study area was prepared using SPSS software. The Area Under Curve (AUC) indicates the accuracy degree of the final map. The extent area of each curve indicates the model’s prediction ability. The value below the graph would be equal to unity in the best case and ideal scenario. This index is a suitable criterion to evaluate the model accuracy.
Results and Discussion
The areas with low elevation and low slope due to the high level of infiltration and water movement in the soil had a higher potential of groundwater, which is consistent with the results of the previous researchers. These areas had a higher groundwater potential in the east and flat terrains than in other directions. From the land use point of view, arable lands and areas with dense vegetation had the highest groundwater potential. The shorter the distance from the waterway and the higher the drainage density leads to the greater the groundwater potential. Areas with Aridsols soil have higher groundwater potential compared to the Entisol and Inceptisols categories. Soft alluvial sediments have a higher potential than other sediments. It is expected that the areas with high groundwater potential will be more in the eastern part of the region due to the high concentration of factors affecting the creation of potential groundwater conditions. The final groundwater potential map also determined these areas as high groundwater potential regions.
Conclusion
The results showed a higher sensitivity to land use and slope variables, which play an important role in water penetration. More than 60% of Lenjanat has moderate to very high groundwater potential. Identifying areas with high groundwater potential is important in determining areas for implementing management programs. It is suggested to use the WOE model with more input variables and other models to prepare a high accuracy potential map should be evaluated in future studies.
 

Keywords


 Arab Ameri, A., Pourghasemi, H., & Shirani, K. (2017). Flood susceptibility zonation using new ensemble Bayesian-AHP methods (Case study: Neka Watershed, Mazandaran Province). Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 4(2), 447- 462 (in Persian).
Asghari, S., & Riahinia, M. (2020). Potentialization of groundwater resources in Khorramabad plain using two methods of fuzzy logic and artificial neural network. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 9(2), 141-158 (in Persian).
Bonham-Carter, G.F., Agterberg, F.P., & Wright, D.F. (1988). Integration of Geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(11), 1585-1592.
Chen, W., Li, H., Hou, E., Wang, S., Wang, G., Panahi, M., Li, T., Peng, T., Guo, C., Niu, C., Xiao, L., Wang, J., Xie, X., & Ahmad, B.B. (2018). GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models. The Science of the total environment, 634, 853–867.
Chenini, I., Mammou, A.B., & El May, M. (2010). Groundwater recharge zone mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis: a case study in Central Tunisia (Maknassy Basin). Water Resources Management, 24, 921-939.
Dahal, R.K., Hasegawa, S., Nonomura, A., Yamanaka, M., Dhakal, S., & Paudyal, P. (2008). Predictive modelling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of-evidence. Geomorphology, 102(3-4), 496-510.
Fallah, F., Daneshfar, M., & Ghorbaninejad, S. (2017). Application of the statistical index model in groundwater potential mapping in the Khorramabad Plain. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 89-98 (in Persian).
Gholami, M., Soleymani, K., & Nekoee, E. (2017). Landslide susceptibility mapping by use of Weight of Evidence (WofE) and Frequency Ratio (FR) and Dempster-Shafer (DSH) models: A case study of Sari-Kiasar region, Northern Iran. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 70(3), 735-750 (in Persian).
Golkarian, A., & Rahmati, O. (2018). Use of a maximum entropy model to identify the key factors that influence groundwater availability on the Gonabad Plain, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77, 369.
Ghorbani Nejad, S., Daneshfar, M., Rahmati, O., Falah, F., Haghizadeh, A., & Tahmasebipour, N. (2017a). Groundwater resource potential of Azna-Aligoudarz plain using environmental variables and frequency ratio (FR) model Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 8(2), 62-78 (in Persian).
Ghorbani Nejad, S., Falah, F., Daneshfar, M., Haghizadeh, A., & Rahmati, O. (2017b). Delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS-based data-driven models. Geocarto International, 32(2), 167-187.
Haghizadeh, A., Moghaddam, D., & Pourghasemi, H. (2017). GIS-based bivariate statistical techniques for groundwater potential analysis. Journal of Earth System Science, 126, 109.
Jothibasu, A., & Anbazhagan, S. (2016). Modeling groundwater probability index in Ponnaiyar River basin of South India using analytic hierarchy process. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(109).
Lee, S., Hyun, Y., & Lee, M. (2019). Groundwater Potential Mapping Using Data Mining Models of Big Data Analysis in Goyang-si, South Korea. Sustainability, (11), 1678.
Manap, M.A., Nampak, H., Pradhan, B., Lee, S., Sulaiman, W.N.A., & Ramli, M.F. (2014). Application of probabilistic-based frequency ratio model in groundwater potential mapping using remote sensing data and GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(2), 711-724.
Mofidifar, M., Eslah, M., & Hasanabadi, A. (2015). Comparison of TOPSIS decision making models and hierarchical analysis in finding groundwater potential in Yazd-Ardakan Plain Basin in GIS. Geography and Environmental Planning, 26(1), 147-156 (in Persian).
Mogaji, K.A., & Lim, H.S. (2018). Application of Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence model to geoelectric and hydraulic parameters for groundwater potential zonation. Astronomy and Geophysics, 7(1), 134-148.
Najafpour, N., Torabipoudeh, H., & Yonesi, H. (2020). Evaluation of Groundwater Quantity and Quality on Aquifer Pollutant (Case Study: Lenjanat Plain, Isfahan). Environmental Research, 11(21), 233-248 (in Persian).
Nampak, H., Pradhan, B., & Manap, M.A. (2014). Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation. Journal of Hydrology, 513, 283-300.
Nohani, A., Merufinia, A., & Khosravi, Kh. (2018). Groundwater Potential Mapping of the Al-shtar Plain Using Evidential Belief Function Model. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 1(12), 119-129 (in Persian).
Oh, H.J., Kim, Y.S., Choi, J.K., Park, E., & Lee, S. (2011). GIS mapping of regional probabilistic groundwater potential in the area of Pohang City, Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 399(3), 158-72.
Rahmati, O., Pourghasemi, H. R., & Zeinivand, H. (2016). Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran. Geocarto International, 31(1), 42-70.
Regmi, A.D., Devkota, K.C., Yoshida, K., Pradhan, B., Pourghasemi, H.R., Kumamoto, T., & Akgun, A. (2014). Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(2), 725-742.
Siahkamari, S., & Zeinivand, H. (2016). Potential of flood prone areas using statistical index model and weight of evidence (Case study: Maderso watershed, Golestan). Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resources, 7(4), 116-133.
Sener, B., Suzen, M.L., & Doyuran, V. (2006). Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environmental Geology, 49(3), 376-388.
Shafiei, N., Amir Ahmadi, A., & Rahmani, A. (2019). Finding potential sources of underground water catchment model Shannon entropy Nourabad Mamasani plain. Journal of Geographic Space, 19(66), 291-304 (in Persian).
Thapa, R., Gupta, S., Guin, S., & Kaur, H. (2017). Assessment of groundwater potential zones using multi-influencing factor (MIF) and GIS: a case study from Birbhum district, West Bengal. Applied Water Science, 7(7), 4117-4131.
Xu, C., Xu, X., Dai, F., Xiao, J., Tan, X., & Yuan, R. (2012). Landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence model in Qingshui River watershed of 2008 Wenchuan earthquake struck region. Journal of Earth Science, 23, 97–120.
Yousefi, H., Younesi, H., Arshia, A., Yarahmadi, Y., & Goodarzi, A. (2021). Determination of flood prone areas with FR, SI and Shannon models in order to reduce flood risks (Case study: Caspian watershed). Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 8(1), 307-319 (in Persian).
Younesi, H., Torabi Podeh, H., Shahi Nejad, B., & Arshia, A. (2020). Groundwater potential mapping using the weights of evidence and statistical indexes in Najafabad, Iran. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 8(29), 36-43 (in Persian).
Zali, M., & Shahedi, K. (2021). Evaluation of landslide sensitivity using fuzzy logic approach and GIS in watershed. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 1(1), 65-79 (in Persian).