Investigating the production functions of water consumption in determining the performance of two watermelon cultivars under water stress

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor/ Department of irrigation and soil physics, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 Researcher/Department of Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Research, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

3 Researcher/Soil and Water Research Department, South Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Kerman, Iran

4 Researcher/ Department of irrigation and soil physics, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Watermelon is a popular fruit that is cultivated in greenhouses and on the ground, and water and fertilizer, as two essential factors for the growth of the product, significantly affect the yield of crops. Watermelon is the twelfth plant in terms of cultivated area in Iran. Due to its importance in export and virtual water, it is necessary to pay special attention to the characteristics of water needs and water consumption. However, water resources are scarce and irrational irrigation and use of fertilizers are common. This caused environmental pollution and waste of resources and also affects the growth and absorption of nutrients. Plant absorption, therefore, affects the yield and quality of the product. China is the first producer of this product in the world with the production of 67% of the total watermelon crop. The next ranks with less than 4% of world production are held by Turkey, Iran, Brazil and Egypt. According to FAO statistics, Iran ranks third in the world in watermelon production. In Iran, 91,000 hectares are cultivated with watermelon, of which 85,400 hectares are irrigated.Considering the special attention given to the watermelon plant as one of the high consumption options in the cultivation pattern, it was necessary to conduct a research in this field to investigate the amount of water required and reduce its yield under deficit irrigation.
 
Materials and Methods
In this study, Charleston variety watermelon was grown with a density of 8000 plants per hectare on May 29, 2022 in the soil and water research farm in Alborz province. Also, Crimson Sweet cultivar with a density of 11,000 thousand plants per hectare was cultivated on Desember 25, 2021 in the southern research center of Kerman province.In this regard, a research was conducted in the form of randomized block design in 4 full irrigation treatments, 75% of water requirement, 50% of water requirement and 30% of water requirement in the research farm of the Soil and Water Research Institute and Kerman Research Center. After applying low irrigations in different treatments, the performance of each treatment was measured. Also, the water requirement values of watermelon were investigated using the water requirement system of the Soil and Water Research Institute of the country under standard conditions. Also, by using two production functions, the sensitivity coefficients of the Charleston variety were determined. Also, the water requirement values of watermelon were investigated using the water requirement system of the Soil and Water Research Institute of the country under standard conditions. Also, using two production functions, the sensitivity coefficients of the Charleston variety were determined.
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the standard water requirement of watermelon in Karaj is about 488 mm and in Jiroft area of Kerman is 423 mm and it is in good agreement with the water requirement estimated by the water requirement system. The results show that watermelon in both cultivars reacted to the lowest amount of stress, so it is sensitive to lack of irrigation, and therefore it is necessary to investigate the values of the production function in their case according to the applied treatments. On the other hand, the highest sensitivity coefficient occurred in the period of 60 to 80 days after cultivation in the middle period of growth and the recalibrated production function estimated the yield of the plant with appropriate accuracy in the applied stresses, which the statistical indicators of Charleston variety RMSE, NRMSE, MBE , d and EF were 497, 0.02, -119, 0.99 and 0.98, respectively, and the Crimson number was 568, 0.095, -536, 0.98 and 0.96 respectively, so the sensitivity coefficients and production function It is proposed to simulate the performance of both watermelon cultivars under water stress conditions. Also, the highest productivity was obtained in the low irrigation treatment of 70% and Crimson variety has higher water consumption efficiency. Therefore, this variety is recommended for watermelon cultivation with 70% less irrigation.
 
Conclusion
Summarizing the results showed that the standard water requirement of watermelon in Karaj is about 488 mm and in Jiroft area of Kerman is 423 mm and it is in good agreement with the water requirement estimated by the NIAZAB system. The sensitivity coefficients and the production function presented for simulation The performance of both watermelon cultivars is suggested under water stress conditions. On the other hand, the highest sensitivity coefficient occurred in the period of 60 to 80 days after cultivation in the middle period of growth and the recalibrated production function estimated the yield of the plant with appropriate accuracy in the applied stresses, which the statistical indicators of Charleston variety RMSE, NRMSE, MBE , d and EF were 497, 0.02, -119, 0.99 and 0.98, respectively, and Crimson number was 568, 0.095, -536, 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. Therefore, the sensitivity coefficients and production function It is proposed to simulate the performance of both watermelon cultivars under water stress conditions. Of course, due to the high performance level of the Crimson variety, the amount of water productivity in this variety is twice that of the Charleston variety, so in terms of water consumption efficiency, the cultivation of the Crimson variety is a priority compared to the Charleston variety. Also, the highest productivity was obtained in the low irrigation treatment of 70% and Crimson variety has higher water consumption efficiency. Therefore, this variety is recommended for watermelon cultivation with 70% less irrigation.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
Abdelkhalik, A., Pascual-Sevaa, N., Inmaculada N., Ginerd A., Baixaulid, C., & Pascual, B. (2019). Yield response of seedless watermelon to different drip irrigation strategies under Mediterranean conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 212, 99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.044
Ahmadi, A. (2022). The effect of increasing water use efficiency on improving the status of groundwater resources using WEAP model in Qazvin Plain. Water and Soil Management and Modelling, 2(1), 53-62. doi: 10.22098/mmws.2022.9333.1034
Bastos, E.A., Silva, C.R., Rodrigues, B.H.N., Andrade, J.R., & Ibiapina, L.M.M. (2012). Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of drip irrigated watermelon in piaui coastline, Brazil. Engenharia Agricola, 32, 582-590. doi: 10.1590/S0100-69162012000300017
Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A.H. (1979). Yield Response to Water. FAO Publication, 33, Rome.
Ebrahimipak, N., Egdernezhad, A., Tafteh, A., & Ahmadee, M. (2019). Evaluation of aquaCrop, WOFOST, and cropsyst to simulate rapeseed yield. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 13(3), 715-726. doi:20.1001.1.20087942.1398.13.3.14.4
Ebrahimipak, N., Tafteh, A., Abbasi, F., & Baghani, J. (2022). Estimation the actual amount of wheat irrigation water using the NIAZAB system and compare with the farm measurement. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2022.346273.669328
Egdernezhad, A., EbrahimiPak, N.A., Tafteh, A., & Ahmadee, M. (2019). Canola irrigation scheduling using AquaCrop model in Qazvin Plain. Water Management in Agriculture, 5(2), 53-64. doi: 20.1001.1.24764531.1397.5.2.7.2
Erdem, Y., Erdem, T., Orta, A.H.,  & Okursoy, H. (2005). Irrigation scheduling for watermelon with crop water stress index (CWSI). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6(4), 449-460. 10.22059/ijswr.2018.261912.667967
Erdem, Y., & Yuksel, A.N. (2003). Yield response of watermelon to irrigation
shortage. Scientia Horticulturae, 98(4), 365-383. doi:10.1016/S0304-4238(03)00019-0
FAO, (2017). FAOSTAT Website. Accesed on 22 December 2017. http://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QC.
FAO, (2016). AQUASTAT Website. Accessed on 2 January 2018. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/ water_use/index.stm.
García-Mendívil, H.A., & Sorribas, F.J. (2021). Effect of citrullus amarus accessions on the population dynamics of meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica and watermelon yield. Scientia Horticulturae, 275, 109680. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109680
Hochmuth, H., Thevs, N., & He, P. (2015). Water allocation and water consumption of irrigation agriculture and natural vegetation in the Heihe River watershed, NW China. Environmental. Earth Sciences, 73, 5269–5279. doi:10.1007/s12665-014- 3773-9.
Jafari, P., Jalali, A.H., & Tadaionfar, S. (2016). Comparing the irrigation water efficiency, yield and yield components of watermelon in different depths of furrow and different plant densities. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 5(18), 291-299. 10.18869/acadpub.jcpp.5.18.291
Jamieson, P.D., Porter, J.R., & Wilson, D.R. (1991). A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research, 27, 337–350. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(91)90040-3
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., & Chau, K. (2019). Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy, 181, 1298–1320.  doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.002
karimi, M., & Jolaini, M. (2017). Evaluation of agricultural water productivity indices in major field crops in Mashhad Plain (technical note). Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 133-138. doi: 10.22067/jwsd.v4i1.52783
Khari, D., Egdernezhad, A., & Ebrahimipak, N. (2023). Comparison of artificial intelligence models and experimental models in estimating reference evapotranspiration (Case study: Ramhormoz synoptic station). Water and Soil Management and Modelling, 3(2), 112-124. doi: 10.22098/mmws.2022.11293.1117
khorramian, M., & Zarifeenia, N. (2018). The effect of tape irrigation levels and scheduled surface irrigation on yield and irrigation water use productivity of two watermelon varieties in Khuzestan. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 41(1), 73-84. doi: 10.22055 /jise. 2017. 17185 . 1244
Kirnak, H., & Dogan, E. (2009). Effect of seasonal water stress imposed on drip irrigated second crop watermelon grown in semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrigation Science, 27,155-164. doi: 10.1007/s00271-008-0130-3
Kuscu, H., Turhan, A., Ozmen, N., Aydinol, P., Buyukcangaz, H., & Demir, A.O. (2015). deficit irrigation effects on watermelon (citrullus vulgaris) in a sub humid environment. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 25,1652-1659. https:// doi.org/ 10.3389 /fpls .2023.1153835
Li, G.H., Zhao, B., Dong, S.T., Zhang, J.W., Liu, P., & Lu, W.P. (2020). Controlled-release urea combining with optimal irrigation improved grain yield, nitrogen uptake, and growth of maize. Agricultural Water Management,  227, 105834. doi:10.1016/j. agwat.2019.105834
Miller, G.A., Farahani, H.J., & Lankford, D. (2010). Set points for watermelon drip irrigation using capacitance probes. Third International symposium of Soil Sensor, Spain, Pp. 185-195.
Parkhideh, J., Barzegar, T., & Nekonam, F. (2018). Growth, yield and physiological responses of watermelon cv. Charleston Gray grafted on bitter apple (Citrullus colocynthis L.) rootstock under deficit irrigation stress. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 49(2), 539-550. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2017.233823.1258
Pejić, B., Mačkić, K., Pavković, S., Ljevnaić-Mašić, B., Aksić, M., & Gvozdanović-Varga, J. (2016). Water-yield relations of drip irrigated watermelon in temperate climatic conditions. Contemporary Agriculture, 65(1-2), 53-59. doi:10.1515/contagri-2016-0009
Raes, D., Greets, E., Wellens, J., & Sahli, A. (2006). Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model. Agricultural Water Management, 81, 335-357. Doi: eee: agiwat: v:81:y: 2006:i:3:p:335-357
Şimşek, M., Kaçıra, M., & Tonkaz, T. (2004). The effects of different drip irrigation regimes
on watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)] yield and yield components under semi-arid
climatic conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55(11), 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03264
Soltani, F., Shajari, M., & Noory, H. (2018). Evaluation of growth, yield, and water use efficiency and evaporation transpiration of some watermelon accessions at drought stress conditions under different irrigation regimes. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 49(2), 351-363. doi: 10.22059/ijhs.2017.207658.1020
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Fereres, E., & Raes, D. (2012). Crop Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 66th Edition, Rome, Italy.
Tafteh, A., Ebrahimipak, N.A., Babazadeh, H., & Kaveh, F. (2013). Evaluation of improvement of crop production functions for simulation winter wheat yields with two types of yield response factors. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5, 111-122. doi: 10.5539/jas.v5n3p111
Tafteh, A., Babazadeh, H., Ebrahimipak, N.A., & Kaveh, F. (2014). Optimization of irrigation water distribution using the MGA method and comparison with a linear programming method. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 63(5), 590–598. doi:10.1002/ird.1869
Turner, N.C. (2004). Agronomic options for improving rainfall-use efficiency of crops in
dryland farming systems. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2413–2425. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh154
Wang, H., Zhou, G.S., Jiang, Y.L., Shi, Y.H., & Xu, Z.Z. (2017). Photosynthetic acclimation and leaf traits of Stipa bungeana in response to elevated CO2 under five different watering conditions. Photosynthetica, 55, 164–175. doi:10.1007/ s11099-016-0239-1
Wang, Z.H., Li, S.X., & Malhi, S. (2008). Effects of fertilization and other agronomic measures on nutritional quality of crops. Journal Science Food Agriculture, 88, 7–23. doi:10.1002/jsfa.3084
Willmott, C.J. (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of American Meteorology Society, 63, 1309-1313. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2
Yang, H., Du, T., Qiu, R., Chen, J., Wang, F., Li, Y., Wang, C., Gao, L., & Kang, S. (2017).
Improved water use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse crops under regulated
deficit irrigation in northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 179, 193–204.
Yin, S.M. (2012). Research on water-saving and quality-regulated irrigation models of special economic crops in greenhouses in arid areas of Northwest China. D. Northwest A & F University. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 1–21.