Simulation of yield and water productivity of Cowpea cultivars under deficit irrigation conditions using the DSSAT model

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Graduated Ph.D. Student/On-Farm Water Management Department, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 Professor/ Department of Water Science and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Deficit irrigation is a solution for less water use with the aim of maximum use of the unit volume of water use and water storage and saving for the development of agriculture or the development of other consumption sections. Although the direct result of the lack of irrigation is the reduction of yield at the unit level, the reduction of production costs and the optimization of net profit will compensate for the reduction of yield. In order to adapt and deal with the limitation of water, it is necessary to use mechanisms to increase the efficiency of water use and water resources. Deficit irrigation is used as a technical and economic method in irrigation to improve the relationship between drinking water and the functioning of agricultural plants, and also as one of the productivity solutions in conditions of water shortage. This method requires consistent, accurate, and efficient management, which is different from traditional irrigation management. Another to solve this problem is the use of crop models that simulate crop yield under different soil and climate conditions. The great advantage of these models is the low cost and the short time spent to obtain results, besides helping better agricultural planning and management towards higher profits. The DSSAT model is a computational system that includes a database management system, crop models, and application programs. Plant simulation models can be useful for predicting crop yield and investigating the effect of drought stress on plant growth and development. The DSSAT model is able to evaluate the impact of environmental factors such as weather, soil properties, and field management decisions. The data and information needed to run the model include spatial location (longitude and latitude, altitude above sea level, average annual temperature) and meteorological information (daily minimum and maximum temperature, solar radiation, and radiation), soil science (such as soil texture, soil structure and depth of each layer, apparent specific weight, nutrients, wilting point, and electrical conductivity), and agricultural operations (type of number and Its type is planting date, planting depth, line spacing, planting density, irrigation dates, amount of irrigation water). In this research, the DSSAT model was used to simulate seed yield, pod, biomass, soil water balance components, and water consumption efficiency in cowpea cultivars.
 
Materials and Methods
This experiment was conducted for two consecutive cropping seasons in 2018 and 2019 in Guilan province and in Astaneh-Ashrafiyeh city with an average height of -5 meters at sea level. The amount of rainfall during the growing season of cowpea in the first and second years was 93 and 94 mm, respectively. This research was done in the form of split plots and in the form of a randomized complete block design with three replications, and the main factor in it includes irrigation at three levels: 100% of water requirement (I1), 75% of water requirement (I2) and 50% of water requirement (I3), and the secondary treatment included three cultivars of cowpea, Kamran cultivar (C1), Khuzestan local variety (C2) and Dehsari local cultivar (C3). The amount of water supplied to each experimental unit was measured by a counter. The amount of water used during the plant growth period included the total amount of irrigation water and the amount of rainfall.
 
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the average relative error between the observed and simulated values in 2018 and 2019 for biomass yields were -0.88 and -0.89%, respectively. With full irrigation and providing 100% of water needs, the amount of biomass, seed, and pod yield in cowpea cultivars increased and the model was able to simulate the process of yield changes in different water needs. The relative error (MRE) between the observed and simulated values in biomass yields in 2017 were between -1.14 and -0.55 percent and in 2018 between -1.19 and It was -0.55 percent. The root mean square error in estimating the productivity of water use based on biomass yield based on water use, for Kamran, Khuzestan, and Dehsari cultivars in 2017 respectively 0.0106, 0.01078, and 0.01087 kg.m-3 and per the year 2018 were estimated as 0.01044, 0.01079, and 0.01091 kg.m-3 respectively. Examining the values of simulation and observation on biomass, seed, and pod yield showed that root means square error and average relative error rate and other statistical tests were within the acceptable range and the DSSAT model was able to reproduce the yield of cowpea cultivars in simulate well the conditions of deficit irrigation. The average relative error between observed and simulated values in water productivity based on water use in biomass, seed, and pod yields in 2018 were -0.95, 0.29, and -0.47 % respectively, and in 2019 it was -0.67, 0.001, and -0.40 % respectively. The mentioned values in water productivity based on transpiration and also based on evaporation and transpiration in the yield of biomass, seeds, and pods were -0.88, 0.08, and -0.45% respectively in 2018 and in 2019, were -0.89, 0.07, and -0.45%, which indicates the appropriate evaluation of the model in simulation and observation conditions.
 
Conclusion
In the field experiment, with the increase in the amount of irrigation water, the seed and biomass yields in cowpea cultivars increased and the DSSAT model was able to change these traits at different levels of irrigation, in accordance with the results observed in the simulation field. However, with the increase of drought stress, the percentage of simulated relative error was higher in stressed conditions than in irrigated conditions. The values of RMSE and RMSEn statistics for each function and water productivity parameters showed that the DSSAT model has an acceptable error. The simulation of the yields of seed, pod, and biomass under the influence of deficit irrigation was acceptable with the mentioned model and it is able to be an efficient tool to support decisions and improve research in management. Water use in cowpea should be recommended for the study area.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abdzad Gohari, A., Tafteh, A., & Ebrahimipak, N. (2022). Investigation of water requirement system in determining the actual amount of irrigation water of peanut plant based on inverse solution of yield function under water stress conditions. Iranian Irrigation and Drainage, 16(3), 460-471 (in Persian).
Allen, R., Pereira, L., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.
Attia, A., El-Hendawy, S., Al-Suhaiban, N., Alotaibi, M., Usman, M., Tahir, M., & Kamal, K. (2021). Evaluating deficit irrigation scheduling strategies to improve yield and water productivity of maize in arid environment using simulation. Agricultural Water Management, 249, 106812.
Basaran, U., Ayan, I., Acar, Z., Mut, H., & Asci, O. (2011). Seed yield and agronomic parameters of cowpea (vigna unguiculata L.) genotypes grown in the black sea region of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(62), 13461-13464.
Bastos, E., Folegatti, M., Faria, R., Júnior, A., & Cardoso, M. (2002). Simulation of growth and development of irrigated cowpea in Piauí State by CROPGRO model. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37(10), 1381-1387.
Bhowmik, A., Khawas, S., Dutta, G., Ray, R., & Patra, S. (2020). Response of summer cowpea to growth, yield and water use efficiency under different irrigation and nutrient management in lower indo-gangetic plains. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(8), 900-911.
Chemutai, C., Cheminingwa, G.N., & Ambuko, J. (2018). Effect of fertilizers and harvesting method on yield of cowpea. African Journal of Rural Development, 3(2), 1-7.
Chimonyo, V.G.P., Modi, A.T., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2016). Water use and productivity of a sorghum-cowpea-bottle gourd intercrop system. Agricultural Water Management, 165, 82-96.
Chisanga, C.B., Phiri, E., Shepande, C., & Sichingabula, H. (2015). Evaluating CERES maize model using planting dates and nitrogen fertilizer in Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(3), 1-19.
Daramy, M.A., Sarkodie-Addo, J., & Dumbuya, G. (2016). The effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application on crude protein, nutrient concentration and nodulation of cowpea in Ghana. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 11(12), 470-480.
Dokoohaki, H., Gheysari, M., Mousavi, S.F., & Mirlatifi, S.M. (2012). Estimation soil water content under deficit irrigation by using DSSAT. Water and Irrigation Management, 2(1), 1-14 (in Persian).
Ghadami Firouzabadi, A., Shahnazari, A., & Raeini, M. (2015). The Economic analysis of deficit irrigation management and determination of the optimum depth of irrigation in sunflower plant. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 21(6), 255-268 (in Persian).
Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C.H., Boote, K.J., Shelia, V., Wilkens, P.W., Singh, U., White, J.W., Asseng, S., Lizaso, J.I., Moreno, L.P., Pavan, W., Ogoshi, R., Hunt, L.A., Tsuji, G.Y., & Jones, J.W. (2019). The DSSAT crop modeling ecosystem. In: p.173-216 (K.J. Boote, editor), Advances in crop modeling for a sustainable agriculture, Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jamieson, P.D., Porter, J.R., & Wilson, D.R. (1991). A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research, 27, 337-350.
Jones, J.W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C.H., Boote, K.J., Batchelor, W.D., Hunt, L.A., Wilkens, P.W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A.J., & Ritchie, J.T. (2003). The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 235-265.
Lomeling, D., Mogga, M., Abdelrahman, A., Mathew Otwari, S., & Yahya, M. (2014). Using the cropgro model to predict phenology of cowpea under rain-fed conditions. International journal of plant and soil science, 3(7), 824-844.
Mondani, F., Karami, p., & Ghobadi, R. (2021). Simulation of moisture regimes effect on maize (Zea mays) growth and yield in Kermanshah region by CERES-Maize model. Journal of Crop Science Research in Arid, 3(1), 39-56 (in Persian).
Nouri, M., Hoogenboom, G., Bannayan, M., & Homaee, M. (2022). CSM‐CERES‐wheat sensitivity to evapotranspiration modeling frameworks under a range of wind speeds. Water, 14(19), 2-20.
Osakabe, Y., Osakabe, K., Shinozaki, K., & Tran, L. (2014). Response of plants to water stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5(86), 1-8.
Prakasham, S.M., Ramanathan, S.P., Annadurai, K., & Prabina, B. (2019). Influence of irrigation regimes and organics on the productivity and quality of vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(3), 3391-3393.
Priestley, C.H.B., & Physics, R.J.T.A. (1972). On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review, 100, 81-92.
Ramezani-Vasokolaei, M., Darzi Naftchali, A., Saber Ali, F., & Kazemi, Sh. (2022). Evaluation and Simulation of Water Table Management Influence on Rice Yield and its Components Involving DSSAT Model. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 12(4), 157-175 (in Persian).
Sepaskhah, A.R., Tavakoli, A., & Mousavi, F. (2006). Principles and applications of deficit irrigation. Publications of Iran's National Irrigation and Drainage Committee, 288 pages (in Persian).
Shardendu, K., Singh, K., & Reddy, R. (2011). regulation of photosynthesis, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and water-use efficiency of cowpea (vigna unguiculata L walp.) under drought. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology,105, 40-50.
Singh, A.K., Tripathy, R., & Chopra, U.K. (2008). Evaluation of CERES wheat and crop system models for water-nitrogen interactions in wheat crop. Agricultural Water Management, 95, 776-786.
Soler, C.M.T., Sentelhas, P.C., & Hoogenboom, G. (2007). Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 27(2), 165-177.
Tsuji, G.Y., Uehara, G., & Balas, S. (1994). DSSAT V3. Honolulu. University Of Hawaii, 3V. 256 pages.
Walpole, R.E., Myers, R.M., & Myers, S.L. (1998). Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. 6th Edition: New Jersey, 823 pages.
White, J., & Hoogenboom, G. (2010). Crop response to climate: ecophysiological models. In: Lobell D, Burke M, editors. Climate change and food security, advances in global change research, 37, 59-83.
Willmott, C.J. (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of American Meteorology Society, 63, 1309-1313.
Yang, J.M., Yang, J.Y., Liu, S., & Hoogenboom, G. (2014). An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data. Agricultural Systems, 127, 81-89.