Numerical Modeling and Trend Analysis of Mahabad Aquifer Quantitative Status

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student/ Department of Water Science and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor/ Department of Water Science and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor/ Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

4 Assistant Professor/ Department of Water Science and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Groundwater is an essential natural resource that is widely used to meet domestic, industrial, and agricultural needs. In recent years, the amount of withdrawal from groundwater has been more than the amount of its recharging leading to going out of balance. Since groundwater is in the ground and it is not possible to observe directly, identifying its properties is time-consuming and expensive. On the other hand, problems such as inconsistent and incomplete input information, heterogeneous aquifers, etc., have made groundwater study difficult. In many watersheds, groundwater resources are the strategic and primary source of water supply for different users. However, groundwater extraction has exceeded the amount rate of recharge in many regions around the world, resulting in harmful ecological and environmental problems, such as water level decline, water quality degradation, drying up of wells, increased pumping costs, and land subsidence. Assessing groundwater resources for their available water volume and obtaining an accurate prediction of groundwater levels (GWL) is central to sustainable management (i.e., balancing between demand and supply) of groundwater and surface water resources in a watershed. Therefore, tools such as groundwater modeling are used to solve this problem. Simulation of groundwater flow with mathematical models is an indirect approach to solving problems with lower costs than direct methods. In fact, the use of mathematical modeling is to simulate the natural conditions of the water surface with mathematical relationships. Groundwater modeling is done using differential equations, and one of the most widely used methods in solving groundwater problems is the use of finite differences and finite elements. Accordingly, the groundwater modeling system (GMS) model and the MODFLOW code were used in this research to study the Mahabad aquifer. Next, the trend of changes in the groundwater level of the range was analyzed by non-parametric tests. Accordingly, the groundwater modeling system (GMS) model and the MODFLOW code were used in this research to study the Mahabad aquifer.
 
Materials and Methods
The study area of Mahabad is located in West Azarbaijan province. GMS software and MODFLOW code were used for groundwater simulation. Using the information of 22 observation wells, exploitation wells information, river information, recharge, and withdrawal from groundwater, the desired model was built. . The model was run in September 2015 for the steady-state and October 2010- September 2011 for the transient state with a monthly time step. The values for hydraulic conductivity and storage coefficient were calibrated for the steady and transient states, respectively. Aquifer thickness varied from 60 to 200 m, and the cell size was considered 200 × 200 m. Rainfall infiltration, return flow, and input flows feed the aquifer. Seventeen percent of the monthly rainfall was considered rainfall infiltration that fed the aquifer. Moreover, based on the wells' primary use, return water from the wells was considered about70, 75, and 20% for drinking water, industrial and agricultural wells, respectively. The GWL is higher in the South part of the aquifer compared to other parts and, as we move from the South part of the aquifer towards its central and southern regions, the GWL declines. In conclusion, the groundwater flows from the upper South part of the aquifer towards its lower part. More exploitation wells are in the aquifer's central section, and most of their extracted water is used for urban and agricultural purposes. It was then implemented in two stable and unstable modes and its performance was evaluated with root mean square (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2) criteria. Various statistical methods have been provided to analyze the trend of time series. Among them, non-parametric methods are more useful in the time series of hydrological variables. These methods are suitable for time series that have elongation or skewness and are independent of the statistical distribution of the time series.  In the following, the Mann-Kendall method and Sen’s slope were used to determine the trend of the groundwater level at significant levels of 90, 95, 99, and 99.9%.
 
Results and Discussion
The simulation results showed that there is a very good agreement between the simulation and observational data. The model evaluation criteria including RMSE, MAE, and R2 for two stable and unstable modes were calculated as 0.84, 0.63, and 0.99, as well as 0.88, 0.72, and 0.98 m, respectively. These values showed the appropriate efficiency of the model. Based on the results, the highest level of groundwater was in the south of the Mahabad aquifer and the lowest level was in the north of the aquifer.  The optimized values ​​of hydraulic conductivity, special yield, aquifer thicknesses, values ​​of exploitation wells, and aquifer transmissivity were determined from the groundwater simulation results. The results of the Mann-Kendall test showed that Haji Khosh, Gapis, and Gorg Tapeh stations had the highest downward trend. So, in these stations, the downward trend was more significant at the level of 0.99%. The Mann-Kendall Z-parameter values were positive for the Qom Qala station, which indicated the rising trend of the underground water level in this area. The results of Sen’s slope test also confirmed the results of the Mann-Kendall test. It was so that the Sen’s slope test showed that the downward slope of the three stations Haji Khosh, Gapis, and Gorg Tapeh occurs more strongly.
 
Conclusion
The results of this research showed that GMS and MODFLOW codes are suitable tools for simulating groundwater and the condition of the aquifer with proper accuracy. Also, the results of Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope tests showed that out of 19 wells, almost 18 had a downward trend, which shows that the Mahabad aquifer is not in a favorable condition and with the increase in harvesting and decrease in rainfall, especially in recent years, its situation will worsen. The Mann-Kendall test showed that the Mahabad aquifer is in poor condition so out of the 19 investigated wells, approximately 18 wells had a downward trend in the groundwater level. The age slope estimator method also confirmed the Mann-Kendall results. Examining the obtained results exhibits that the use of new approaches for simulation provides the opportunity to manage and balance the allocation of groundwater resources effectively. Further, the use of new tools can be considered for implementing balancing scenarios related to groundwater resources.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abareshi, F., Meftah Halghi, M., & Dehghani, A. A. (2014). The trend of groundwater quality parameters in Zarringol Plain using nonparametric Mann-Kendall and Sen̕s Methods. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 21(3), 79-100. dor:20.1001.1.23222069.1393.21.3.4.3 [In Persian]
Adeli, B., Kangarani, H., Sadodin, A., Bazrafshan, O., & Armin, M. (2018). Using the WQI method and the Mann-Kendall test to assess the qualitative and quantitative status of groundwater aquifers (case study: Sarkhoon plain, Hormozgan province). Iranian journal of Ecohydrology, 5(3), 801-811. doi:10.22059/ije.2018.244156.761 [In Persian]
Azizi, F., Asghari Moghaddam, A., & Nazemi, A. (2019). Groundwater flow and salinity intrusion simulation in malekan plain aquifer. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, 13(45), 32-43. dor:20.1001.1.20089554.1398.13.45.7.1 [In Persian]
Bashi-Azghadi, S.N., Kerachian, R., Bazargan-Lari, M.R., & Solouki, K. (2010). Characterizing an unknown pollution source in groundwater resources systems using PSVM and PNN. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 7154-7161. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.019
Bayat, M., Eslamian, S., Shams, G., & Hajiannia, A. (2020). Groundwater level prediction through GMS software–case study of Karvan area, Iran. Quaestiones Geographicae, 39(3), 139-145. doi:10.2478/quageo-2020-0028
Boyce, S.E., Nishikawa, T., & Yeh, W.W. (2015). Reduced order modeling of the Newton formulation of MODFLOW to solve unconfined groundwater flow. Advances in Water Resources, 83, 250-262. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.005
Cheraghi, S., Nagafi, B., Shajari, S., & Javan, M. (2020). The trend of changes in groundwater quantity and quality in the Sarvestan Plain of Fars Province. Watershed Management Research Journal, 33(2), 82-96. doi:10.22092/wmej.2019.128069.1283 [In Persian]
Dastvareh, J., Naserianasl, Z., hasanvand, H., & Amiri Domari, S. (2020). Modeling groundwater level and investigating the aquifer status of Minab plain. Geography and Human Relationships, 3(2), 50-59. doi:10.22034/gahr.2020.247817.1442 [In Persian]
Delavar, H., VahabzadahKbriya, G., Ghorbani, J., & Ashrafi, M. (2021). Investigating of quantitative trend changes in Aquifer water table during1992 -2011 by Mann-kendall test (Case study: Firoozabad plain, Fars province, Iran). New Findings in Applied Geology, 15(30), 165-176.  doi:10.22084/nfag.2021.23609.1451 [In Persian]
Ebrahimi Khusfi, Z., vali, A., Ghazavi, R., & khosroshahi, M. (2019). An investigation of the changes in the water table and the storage of western aquifers of Gavkhouni wetland during 1981-2013. Iranian Water Researches Journal, 13(4), 113-123. [In Persian]
Edalat, A., Rajabi, A., & Khodaparast, M. (2022). Numerical modeling of groundwater flow in Ali Abad Plain of Qom to predict fluctuations of the water table and hydraulic conductivity. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology, (In Press). [In Persian]
Ensafi Moghaddam, T. (2020). Trend analysis of annual, seasonal and monthly groundwater level (Case study: Sub-basin of Arak Mighan). Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, 27(3), 516-544. doi:10.22092/ijrdr.2020.6785.1075 [In Persian]
Ershad Hosseini, M., Keshtkar, A., Hosseini, S., & Afzali, A. (2021). Analysis of temporal trend of groundwater quality using nonparametric Mann-Kendall and Sen’s methods (Case study: Yazd-Ardakan Plain). Geography and Environmental Planning, 32(4), 87-106. doi:10.22108/gep.2021.127620.1404 [In Persian]
Flores-Márquez, E.L., Jiménez-Suárez, G., Martínez-Serrano, R.G., Chávez, R.E., & Pérez, D.S. (2006). Study of geothermal water intrusion due to groundwater exploitation in the Puebla Valley aquifer system, Mexico. Hydrogeology Journal14(7), 1216-1230. doi:10.1007/s10040-006-0029-0
Gholami, F., Zarei, H., & Marofi, S. (2021). Trend Analysis of Groundwater Quantity and Quality Parameters (Case Study: Tuyserkan Plain). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 44(1), 127-140. doi:10.22055/jise.2021.20618.1487 [In Persian]
Kayhomayoon, Z., Babaeian, F., Ghordoyee Milan, S., Arya Azar, N., & Berndtsson, R. (2022). A combination of metaheuristic optimization algorithms and machine learning methods improves the prediction of groundwater level. Water, 14(5), 751. doi:10.3390/w14050751
Kayhomayoon, Z., Azar, N.A., Milan, S.G., Moghaddam, H.K., & Berndtsson, R. (2021). Novel approach for predicting groundwater storage loss using machine learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113237. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113237
Kendall, M.G. (1970). Rank Correlation Methods. 2nd Edition: NewYork: Hafner.
Malekzadeh, M., Kardar, S., & Shabanlou, S. (2019). Simulation of groundwater level using MODFLOW, extreme learning machine and Wavelet-Extreme Learning Machine models. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 9, 100279. doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100279
Mann, H.B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Journal of Econometrica, 13, 245-259.
Mays, L.W., & Todd, D.K. (2005). Groundwater hydrology. Third addition: John Wily and Sons, Inc., Arizona State University.
Milan, S.G., Roozbahani, A., & Banihabib, M.E. (2018). Fuzzy optimization model and fuzzy inference system for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. Journal of Hydrology, 566, 421-434. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.078
Ministry of Energy, (2013). Comprehensive report on studies of water resources of Urmia Lake basin. [In Persian]
Ministry of Energy, (2009). Studies on updating the balance of water resources of the study areas of the catchment area of Lake Urmia, ending with the year 2009-2010. [In Persian]
Mohammadi, A., & Ghaeini-Hessaroeyeh, M. (2021). Groundwater Modeling of Astaneh-Kuchesfehan Aquifer. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 44(3), 29-44.  doi:10.22055/jise.2020.22058.1582 [In Persian]
Roushangar, K., Nourani, V., & Dolatshahi, M. (2020). Investigation and trend identification of groundwater level variations using discrete wavelet transform and non-parametric tests (case study: Azarshahr plain). Iran-Water Resources Research, 16(1), 102-115. dor:20.1001.1.17352347.1399.16.1.8.2 [In Persian]
Sahoo, S., Swain, S., Goswami, A., Sharma, R., & Pateriya, B. (2021). Assessment of trends and multi-decadal changes in groundwater level in parts of the Malwa region, Punjab, India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development14, 100644. doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100644
Shamsudduha, M., Chanller, R.E., Taylor, R.G., & Ahmed, K.M. (2009). Recent trends in groundwater levels in a highly seasonal hydrological system: The Ganges- Brahmaputra- Meghana delta. Hydrology and Earth System Science, 13, 2373- 2385. doi:10.5194/hess-13-2373-2009, 2009
Xu, Z.X., Takeuchi, K., & Ishidaira, H. (2003). Monotonic trend and step changes in Japanese precipitation. Journal of Hydrology, 279(1-4), 144-150. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00178-1