Sensitivity analysis of Hydrus software to input data in simulating water movement and root uptake of grass as a reference plant

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor/ Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water Management Research Center, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 M.Sc. Graduated Student/ Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

3 Professor/ Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water Management Research Center, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Understanding the movement of water in the soil and the process of root water uptake is critical. Numerical simulation is an effective solution for optimizing water management in the field. Accurate prediction of water movement in the soil and root water uptake, to create optimal moisture conditions in the root zone, is important for better plant performance. Investigating the phenomenon of water absorption by roots in hydrological and plant models requires a quantitative description of water absorption by plant roots. Accuracy of model simulation in predicting soil water transfer and root absorption, as temporal and spatial variables, is the most important criterion in agricultural issues.
Materials and Methods
The water movement in the soil and root water uptake were simultaneously simulated using HYDRUS-3D software. For this purpose, the grass plant was cultivated in three lysimeters with the same soil texture. The grass plant was irrigated every three days at 10 am. The soil water content of the depths of 5, 15, 25, 40, 60, and 80 cm was measured every day at 10 am and 6 pm. The volume of water drained from the lysimeters was measured every day. The measurements were done over a period of 81-day. Soil’s physical properties were measured in the laboratory.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that in all simulations, the minimum and maximum relative errors were obtained at 0.79 and 35.1%, respectively. The cumulative measured volume of drainage water in the whole period is 162.75 liters and the cumulative volume of simulated drainage water in the whole period is 133.79 liters. The relative error between these two values ​​is equal to 5.28%. Rainfall amounts have a significant effect on estimating the volume of simulated drainage water and its difference from the measured volume of drainage water. With the increase of initial moisture and soil hydraulic conductivity, the relative error between the measured and estimated drainage water data increases, and with the increase of saturated moisture and residual moisture in the soil, the relative error decreases. The values of root water uptake (Minimum 0.5 and maximum 3.5 liters in one irrigation interval), showed that in the third stage of growth, root absorption has the maximum value and by comparing the actual and potential root absorption, which have a low difference, no stress has been applied to the plant.
Conclusion
The change in the input parameters causes a change in the estimated volume of drained water at the beginning of the period. When the initial moisture and residual soil moisture are considered as 0.3 and 0.15325, respectively, the relative error between the measured and estimated drainage water data is the lowest. The root water uptake values were also estimated using the model. According to the values of actual and potential root water uptake, in the whole period, which has very small differences, no stress has been applied to the grass plant and sufficient water has been provided to the plant.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abtahi, S., & Besharat, S. (2011). The use of Hydrus software in simulating the movement and absorption of water in the soil for the sugar beet plant. First National Conference on Meteorology and Agricultural Water Management, Tehean, Iran (in Persian).
Akbari Baseri, Z. (2017). Simultaneous Modeling of Soil Water Flow and Root Water Uptake in Lysimeter. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Mohaghegh Ardabil, Ardabil, Iran (in Persian).
Akbari Baseri, Z., Raoof, M., Rasoulzadeh, A., & Aziz Mobaser, J. (2018). Two-stage calibration of gypsum block. The second National Conference on Protection of Natural Resources and Environment, Ardabil, Iran (in Persian).
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (2006). Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines For Computing Crop Water Requirements. Final report of FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper NO. 56.
Barzegar, A. (2010). Advanced soil physics. 2sd edition: Shahid Chamran University Press,  415 pages (in Persian).
Besharat, S., Behmanesh, J., Rezayi, H., & Dalir, R. (2014). Evaluation of Hydrus-2D for soil water infiltration by using laboratory measurements in the weighing lysimeter. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 21(5), 297-306 (in Persian).
Brooks, R.H., & Corey, A.T. (1969). Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 72(2), 61-88.
Cote, C.M., Bristow, K.L., Charleworth, P.B., & Cook, F.J. (2003). Analysis of soil wetting and solute transport in sub-surface trickle irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 22(3-4), 143-156.
Ebrahimi, F., & Raoof, M. (2015). Effect of different Rosetta predictive model on soil hydraulic properties estimation using HYDRUS-2D and effect of land use changing on them. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2 (9), 303-313 (in Persian).
Ebrahimi, F., & Raoof, M. (2016). Evaluation of global soil databases in extracting soil hydraulic conductivity curve and effect of land use change in unsteady state flow. Soil Research, 30(3), 319-328 (in Persian).
Er-Raki, S., Ezzahr, J., Merlin, O., Amazirh, A., Ait Hssaine, B., Kharou, M.H., Hkabba, S., & Chehbouni, A. (2021). Performance of the HYDRUS-1D model for water balance components assessment of irrigated winter wheat under different water managements in semi-arid region of Morocco. Agricultural Water Management, 244, 151-164.
Herkelrath, W.N., Miller, E.E., & Gardner, W.R. (1977). Water uptake by plants: I. Divided Root Experiments. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41, 1033-1038.
Kang, S., Zhang, F., & Zhang, J. (2001). A simulation model of water dynamics in winter wheat field and its application in a semiarid region. Agricultural Water Management, 49, 115-129.
Kosugi, K. (1996). Lognormal distribution model for unsaturated soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research, 32(9), 2697-2703.
Li, K.Y., De Jong, R., & Biosvert, J. B. (2001). An exponential root water- uptake model with water stress compensation. Journal of Hydrology, 252, 189-204.
Mansell, R.S., Liwang, M., Ahuja, L.R., & Bloom, S.A. (2002). Adaptive grid refinement in numerical models for water flow and chemical transport in soil: A review. Vadose Zone Journal, 1, 222–238.
Meshkat, M., Warner, R.C., & Workman, S.R. (1999). Modeling of evaporation reduction in drip irrigation system. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 125(6), 315-323.
Molz, F.J., & Remson, I. (1970). Extraction term models of soil moisture use by transpiring plants. Water Resources Research, 6, 1346-1356.
Mualem, Y. (1976). A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 12(3), 513-522.
Raoof, M. (2019). Determination of sugar beet crop coefficient using lysimeter in Ardabil Plain and its comparison with FAO Global Data. Water Research in Agriculture, 33(2), 175-188 (in Persian).
Raoof, M. (2022). Effect of Hydrus 3D input parameters on simultaneous simulation of water movement and sugar beet root water uptake. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 10(46), 377-390 (in Persian).
Raoof, M., Sadraddini, A.A., Nazemi, A.H., & Marofi, S. (2009). Estimating saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and sorptivity coefficient in transient state in sloping lands. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 7 (3&4), 861-864.
Rasoulzadeh, A., & Raoof, M. (2014). Principals and Methods of Irrigation. 2sd edition: Amidi Publication, 285 pages (in Persian).
Salazar, O., Wesstrom, I., & Joel, A. (2008). Evaluation of Drainmod using saturated hydraulic conductivity estimated by a pedotransfer function model. Agricultural. Water Management, 95, 1135-1143.
Schmitz, G.H., Shutze, N., & Petersohn, U. (2002). New strategy for optimizing water application under trickle irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 128(5), 287-297.
Shamsayi, A. (2000). Flow hydraulics in porous media (volume one). 2sd edition: Publications of Amir Kabir University of Technology Publishing Center (Tehran Polytechnic), 351 pages (in Persian).
Simunek, J., & Hopmans, J. W. (2009). Modeling compensated root water and nutrient uptake. Ecological Modeling, 220(4), 505-521.
Siyal, A.A., & Skaggs, T.H. (2009). Measured and simulated soil wetting patterns under porous clay pipe sub-surface irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 893-904.
Van Genuchten, M.Th. (1980). A close-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society American Journal Journals, 44, 892–898.
Vogel, T., & Cislerova, C.M. (1988). On the reliability of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity calculated from the moisture retention curve. Transport in Porous Media, 3, 1-15.
Vrugt, J.A., Hopmans, J.W., & Simunek, J. (2001a). Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model. Soil Science Society American Journal Journals, 65, 1027–1037.
Vrugt, J.A., Van Wijk, M.T., Hopmans, J.W., & Simunek, J. (2001b). One, two, and three dimensional root water uptake functions for transient modeling. Water Resources Research, 37, 2457–2470.
Wagner, B., Tarnawski, V.R., Hennings Müller, V., Wessolek, U., & Plagge, R. (2001). Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set. Geoderma, 102, 275-297.
Yadau, B.K., & Mathur, Sh. (2008). Modeling soil water uptake by plants using non linear Dynamic root density distribution function. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 134(4), 430-436.
Zeng, W., Lei, G., & Zha, Y. (2018). Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the HYDRUS-1D model for root water uptake in saline soils. Crop and Pasture Science, 62(2), 83-94.
Water and Soil Management and Modelling
Volume 2, Issue 3
September 2022
Pages 94-107

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 16 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics