Effects of watershed management practices on the quadric services of Chehel-Chai Watershed, Golestan Province

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Postdoc Researcher/ Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Associate Professor/ Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Ecological services are the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems and include four categories of provision, regulatory, cultural, and supportive services. Each of these four categories includes a wide range of ecosystem services. In fact, climate control services include hydrological cycles, water supply and biochemicals, land-based processes and various biological processes. In this regard, to reduce the degradation rate and improve the condition of the Chehl-Chai Watershed in the northeast of Iran, several watershed management measures have been implemented.
Materials and Methods
The present study has investigated the extent of changes of supporting service (soil aggregate stability), provisioning (crops and fruits production, timber, and biomass production), regulating (control of soil erosion, runoff control, and carbon sequestration), and cultural (Increase of interaction and sustainability of local communities, increase of landscape aesthetics and tourist attraction and increase of knowledge and educational values) as a result of implementation of restoration measures in Chehl-Chai Watershed of Golestan Province. After quantifying the amount of services, prioritization of measures was done using TOPSIS method to identify and propose the most effective management option to improve services in the study area.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the effect of watershed management measures on the ecosystem services improvement is not the same for all services, whereas it is highest for the regulating services and decreases towards the provisioning, supporting, and cultural services, respectively. Furthermore, the watershed management measures on improvement of the watershed services of treatment sub-watershed showed a statistically significant difference at the level of 5% (p<0.05). The results of applying TOPSIS method in the treatment sub-watershed showed that walnut orchards have provided the best effectiveness according to the indicators and criteria considered in the study. In other words, watershed management measures, through increasing the vegetation cover have led to more preciptation absorption, reduction of surface runoff and soil erosion in sloping lands and enhancement of landscape aesthetics as well as improvement of stakeholders participation level, social relationships, and income generation through conducting training and extension programs.
Conclusion
Among the employed measures, horticultural activities (planting walnut trees) have had the most success and if additional measures are taken and expanded, the success rate can be improved to a more desirable level. The watershed management measures are economically viable and can be implemented by the people. Therefore, in order to optimally manage water and soil resources and make watershed management more effective in improving the services of Chehelchai watershed, horticultural activities intercropped with forage and medicinal plants are recommended. In addition, the criteria, indicators and procedures applied in this study to quantify the effectiveness of watershed measures on ecosystem services can be consulted in developing a methodology or guideline for monitoring and evaluation of watershed management measures.

Keywords

References

Amirnejad, H., & Ataei soluk, k. (2018). Estimation of economic value of gas regulation function by Bemo National Park rangeland ecosystem, Case Study: Carbon Dioxide Stabilization and Oxygen Supply. Environmental Research, 8 (15), 193- 202 (in Persian).
An, S.S., Darboux, F., & Cheng, M. (2010). Revegetation as an efficient means of increasing soil aggregate stability on the Loess Plateau (China). Geoderma, 209-210(2), 75-85.
Asadollahi, Z., Salman Mahini, A., Mirkarimi, S., & Azimi, M. (2016). Modeling of soil conservation watershed services with InVEST software (Case study: Eastern part of Gorganrood watershed). Environmental Erosion Research, 5 (19), 61- 75 (in Persian).
Bagarello, V., & Sgroi, A. (2004). Using the single-ring infiltrometer method to detect temporal changes in surface soil field-saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Till Research. 76, 13–24.
Balazsi, A., Danhardt, J., Collins, S., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., & Hartel, T. (2020). Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe. Land Use Policy, 100, 1-9.
Brauman, K.A., Daily, G.C., Duarte, T.K.E., & Mooney, H.A. (2007). The nature value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 21 (32), 67-98.
Brown, G., Montag, J.M., & Lyon, K. (2012). Public participation GIS: A method for identifying ecosystem services. Society and Natural Resource, 25 (7), 633-651.
Bronick, G.J., & Lal, R. (2005). Manuring and rotation effect on soil organiccarbon concentration for different aggregate size fractions on two soils northeastern Ohio, USA. Soil and Tillage Research, 81, 239-252.
Celik, I. (2005). Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research, 83, 270-277.
Dai, X., Johnson, B.A., Luo, P., Yang, K., Dong, L., Wang, Q., Liu, Ch., Li, N., Lu, H., Ma, L., Yang, Zh., & Yao, Y. (2021). Estimation of urban ecosystem services value: A case study of chengdu, southwestern China. Remote Sensing, 13 (207), 1-24.
Darabi, M., Gharehdaghi, H., & Nejabat, M. (2019). Evaluation of the performance of watershed management projects on the rate of erosion and sediment transport in the watersheds of Sivand Dam, Fars province. Hydrogeomorphology, 14, 197- 218 (in Persian).
Eskandari Shahraki, A., Kiani, B., & Iranmanesh, Y. (2017). The effect of different land uses on soil carbon sequestration. Iranian Forest and Poplar Research, 24 (3), 379- 389 (in Persian).
FAO, (2002). Agriculture in the world, towards 2030-2015. Publications of Research Planning and Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Ghanbari, Y., & Ghodusi, J. (2008). Investigation of social and economic effects of watershed management activities on rural households in Tang khoshk Watershed (Semirom city). Human Sciences, 29 (1), 195- 204 (in Persian).
Hargreaves, K.J., Milne, R., & Cannell, M. (2003). Carbon balances of afforested peatland in Scotland. Journal of Forestry, 76 (3), 299-318.
Heal, G.M., Barbier, E.B., Boyle, K.J., Covich, A.P., Gloss, S.P., Hershner, C.H., Hoehn, J.P., Pringle, C.M., Polasky, S., Segerso, K., & Schrader- Frechette, K. (2005). Valuing ecosystem services. toward better environmental Decision- making. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Herrick, J.E., Whitford, W.G., De Soyza, A.G., Van Zee, J.W., Havstad, K.M., Seybold, C.A., & Walton, M. (2001). Field soil aggregate stability kit for soil quality and rangeland health evaluations. Catena, 44 (1), 27–35.
Indufor. (2002). Assessing Forest Based carbon sinks in the Kyoto protocol Forest Management and Carbon sequestration. Discussion paper, 115 pages.
Jaiyeoba, I.A. (2003). Changes in soil properties due to continu- ous cultivation in Nigerian semiarid savannah. Soil and Tillage Research, 70, 91–98.
Jafari, Z., Niknahad gharehmakher, H., Ghasemi, M., & Jafari, A. (2018). Investigation of the effects of land use optimization on some physical and chemical properties of soil and its erodibility index in Avard rangelands. Iranian Range and Desert Research, 24 (1), 80-88 (in Persian).
Javadi Tabalvandi, M.R., Zehtabian, G.h., Ahmadi, H., Ayobi, Sh.A., Jafari, M., & Alizadeh, M. (2011). The role of different land use in soil carbon sequestration (Case study: Nomehroud watershed of Noor city). Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 1(2), 156- 166 (in Persian).
Kabiri Hendi, M., Mirkarimi, S.H., & Salmanmahiny, A. (2021). Cultural ecosystem services assessment in Golestan Province. Environmental Sciences Studies, 5(2), 2560-2568 (in Persian).
Karimi, Z., & Sheikh, V.B. (2020). Evaluation of the attitude stakeholders’ of natural resources and environment projects (Case Study: Hablehroud Watershed). Watershed Engineering and Management, 11(2), 467-477 (in Persian).
Karimi, Z., Sheikh, V., Sadoddin, A., & Mobarghaee Dinan, N. (2022). Evaluation of watershed management interventions on biomass carbon sequestration and stakeholders’ perception about watershed condition improvement (case study: Dehchenashk sub-watershed, Chehl Chai watershed). Environmental Sciences, 19 (3), 217- 236 (in Persian).
Komiyama, A., Ong, J.E., & Poungparn, S. (2008). Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: A review. Aquatic Botany, 89 (2), 128–137.
Logsdon, R.A., & Chaubey, I. (2013). A quantiative approach to evaluating ecosystem servise. Ecological Modelling, 257, 57-65.
Luederitz, Ch., Brink, E., Gralla, F., Hermelingmeier, V., Meyer, M., Niven, L., Panzer, L., Partelow, S., Rau, A., Sasaki, R., Abson, D.A., Lang, D.J., Wamsler, Ch., & Wehrden, H. (2015). A review of urban ecosystem services: six key challenges for future research. Journal of Ecosystem Services, 14, 98-112.
Martinez, M.L., Perez-Maque, O., Vazquez, G., Castillo-Campos, G., Garcia-Franco, J., Mehltreter, K., & Landgrave, R. (2009). Effects of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical in montane cloud forests of Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 258 (9), 1856-1863.
MacDicken, K.G. (1977). A guide to monitoring carbon storage in foresty and agroforesty projects. Winrock International for Agricultral Development, Forest Carbon Monitoring Program, 87 pages.
McCool, D.K., Brown, L.C., Foster, G.R., Mutchler, C.K., & Meyer, L.D. (1997). Revised slope steepness factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 30 (5), 1387-1396.
Meshesha, Y.B., & Birhanu, B.S. (2015). Assessment of the effectiveness of watershed management intervention in Chena Woreda, Kaffa Zone, southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7, 1257-1269.
Moshari, M., Sepehri, A., Barani, H., & Danehkar, A. (2020). Formulating the Criteria and Indexes for Valuation of Cultural Services of Natural Ecosystems on the Basis of Endemic Characteristics of Iran. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 9(4) 305-312 (in Persian).
Nelson, D.W., & Sommers, L.E. (1982). Total carbon , organic, organic metter. Pp. 539- 580, In: Miller, A.L., Kenney, R.H. (Eds,), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, 2nd Edition, Agronomy Monograph 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Parsapour, M.K., Sohrabi, H., Soltani, A., & Iranmanesh, Y. (2014). Allometric equations for estimating biomass in four poplar species at Charmahal and Bakhtiari province. Forest and Poplar Research, 21 (3), 528-517 (in Persian).
Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Weesies, G.A., McCool, D.K., & Yoder, D.C. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: Aguide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No. 703, USDA, Washington, DC, USA. 404.
Sabin, F.F. (1996). Remote sensing, principal and interpretation. 3rd Edition: W.H.Freman and company, New York, 494 pages.
Sadoddin, A., Sheikh, V., Mostafazadeh, R., & Halili, M.Gh. (2010). Analysis of vegetation-based management scenarios using MCDM in the Ramian watershed, Golestan, Iran, International Journal of Plant Production, 4 (1), 51-62.
Shahraki, M.R., Gholami bagheri, N., Sharat Madandar, M., & Bahmanesh, B. (2015). Pastures products and services, point of views and priorities of local (Case Study: Cashgarized Rangelands, Mazandaran Province, Iran). Rangeland Sciences, 5, 212-221 (in Persian).
Sternberg, M., Gutman, M., Perevolotsky, A., Ungar, E.D., & Kigel, J. (2000). Vegetation response to grazing management in a Mediterranean herbaceous community: A functional group approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2, 224-237.
Subedi, B.P., Pandey, S.S., Pandey, A., Bahadur Rana, E., Bhattarai, S., Raj, Banskota, T., Charmakar, S., & Tamrakar, R. (2010). Asia network for sustainable agriculture and bio resources. Guidelines for measuring carbon stocks in community-managed forests. Federation of community forest users, Nepal, International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, 16 pages.
Vandenberghe, C., Francois, F., Moravie, M.A., Gadallah, F., & Buttler, A. (2007). Short term effects of cattle browsing on tree sapling growth in mountain wooded pastures. Plant Ecology, 188, 253-264.
Wang, Z., Batelaan, O., & De Smedt, F. (2017). A distributed model for water and energy transfer between soil, plants and atmosphere (WetSpa). Physics and Chemistrt of the Earth. 21, 189- 193.
Wassie, A., Sterck, F.J., Teketay, D., & Bongers, F. (2009). Effect of livestock exclusion on tree regeneration in church forests of Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 765-772.
Wischmeier, W.H., & Smith, D.D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion. losses: a guide to conservation planning. DA, Agriculture Handbook, Washington DC, GPO,US. 47 pages.
Yang, T., & Hung, C.C. (2007). Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robotics and Computer Integrated, 23, 126-137.
Yushanjiang, A., Zhang, F., Kung, H., & Li, Z.H. (2018). Spatial–temporal variation of ecosystem service values in Ebinur Lake Wetland National Natural Reserve from 1972 to 2016, Xinjiang, arid region of China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77, 586.
Zhang, P., He, L., Fan, X., Huo, P., Liu, Y., Zhang, T., Pan, Y., & Yu, Zh. (2015). Ecosystem service value assessment and contribution factor analysis of land use change in Miyun county, China. Sustainability, 7, 7333-7356.
Water and Soil Management and Modelling
Volume 2, Issue 4
December 2022
Pages 18-36

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 March 2022
  • Revise Date: 30 March 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 April 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics