Estimation of soil texture fractions under limited distribution of field observation using remotely sensed data (a case study: Marjan Watershed Rangelands)

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student/Department of Natural Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

2 Associate Professor/ Department of Natural Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Understanding the spatial variability of soil texture as one of the most important characteristics of soil is essential for soil and water resources management, productivity and sustainable development. However, in many cases, we face the limitation of field data due to the costs of soil analysis. The aim of this study was to estimate the soil surface texture (percentages of clay, silt and sand proportions) in lack of proper distribution of field data using satellite-based indices and regression modeling.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted in Marjan rangelands of Boroujen. Soil samples (80 replicates) were collected from each subplot 2m×2m, and at depth 0–20 cm. Garmin GPS was used to record the coordinates of the sampling locations. Then, Soil samples from three subplots (as one plot 30m×30m) were mixed together and a sample of 500g was transferred to the laboratory. First, the soil samples were first air-dried then passed through a 2mm. Then, the particle size distributions of soil samples were analyzed following the hydrometer method. In order to predict sand proportions spatially from raw spectral bands and bands compositions of Landsat 8 satellite data including particle size index (GSI), Clay Index (CI), Band 4 to Band 7 ratio, Band 6 to Band 7 ratio and Brightness Index (BI) and physiographic variables including DEM and slope were used as auxiliary variables. To map soil texture compositions, we fitted a linear regression model between field observations and GSI index. Soil sand, silt and clay content were extracted from the predicted soil texture map.
Results and Discussion
Pearson correlation analysis showed that there are a significant relationship (p ≤ 0.05) between GSI and soil texture fractions and CI had a significant relationship with silt and sand. Between the physiographic variables, DEM had a significant correlation with clay, silt and sand, and slope with clay and sand. Therefore, these variables were selected as suitable auxiliary variables for spatial prediction of soil texture fractions using multiple regression. The central and southern parts of the study area, have a higher amount of clay and silt. Most parts of the region have clay and silt between 40-40%. Whereas, low silt and clay content are mostly observed in the north and northeast of the region. Based on sand map, north, northeast and east of the study area had the highest amount of sand (>40%) and the lowest amount of sand was observed in the central and southern parts of the region (sand percentage between 20-25%). The auxiliary variables had good accuracy in spatial prediction of soil texture compositions, especially in limited/inadequate distribution of sampled field data.
Conclusion
The results showed that remote sensing data and topographic properties combined with field data using multiple modeling can be used to better prediction the spatial distribution of soil texture compositions in large scale, when we are faced with data limitations. The generated maps can be used as basic information for environmental management and modeling.

Keywords

References

Adhikari, K., Guadagnini, A., Toth, G., & Hermann, T. (2009). Geostatistical analysis of surface soil texture from Zala County in western Hungary. International Symposium on Environment, Energy and Water in Nepal: Recent Researches and Direction for Future, Citeseer, Pp. 219-224.
Asadzadeh, F., Khosraviaqdam, k., Yaghmaeian Mahabadi, N., & Ramezanpour, H. (2019). Spatial Variation of Mineral Particles of the Soil using Remote Sensing Data and Geostatistics to the Soil Texture Interpolation. Journal of Water and Soil, 32(6), 1207-1222 (in Persian).
Boettinger, J.L., Ramsey, R.D., Bodily, J.M., Cole, N.J., Kienast_Brown S., Nield, S.J., Saundes, A.M., & Stum, A.K. (2008). Landsat spectral data for digital soil mapping. Pp. 193–203, In: Hartemink, A.E., McBratney, A.B., Mendonca Santos, M.L. (Eds.), Digital soil mapping with limited data. Springer science, Australia.
Brown, D.J., & Shepherd K.D., Walsh M.G., Mays M.D., and Reinsch, T.G. (2006). Global soil characterization with VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma, 132(3-4), 273-290.
Broge, N.H., Thomsen, A.G., & Greve, M.H. (2004). Prediction of topsoil organic matter and clay content from measurements of spectral reflectance and electrical conductivity. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 54(4), 232-240.
Chagas, C.S., Junior, W.C., Bhering, S.B., & Filho, B.C. (2016). Spatial prediction of soil surface texture in a semiarid region using random forest and multiple linear regressions. Catena, 139, 232–240.
Castro-Franco, M., Domenech, M.B., Borda, M.R., & Costa, J.L. (2018). A spatial dataset of topsoil texture for the southern Argentine Pampas. Geoderma Regional, 12, 18–27.
Cole, S., Mikhailova, E., Post, C., Privette, C., Schlautman, M.A., & Cope, M. (2017). Comparing SSURGO data with geospatial field measurements to estimate soil texture and infiltration rate classes in glaciated soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 48 (11), 1309–18.
Carvalho Junior, W., Lagacherie, P., Chagas, C.S., Calderano Filho, B., & Bhering, S.B. (2014). A regional-scale assessment of digital mapping of soil attributes in a tropical hillslope environment. Geoderma, 232, 479–486.
Cotching, W.E., Oliver, G., Downie, M., Corkrey, R., & Doyle, R.B. (2013). Land use and management influences on surface soil organic carbon in Tasmania. Soil Research, 51(8), 615–630.
Delbari, M., Afrasiab, P., & Loiskandl, W. (2011). Geostatistical analysis of soil texture fractions on the field scale. Soil and Water Resources, 6, 173–189.
Dobarco, M.R., Arrouays, D., Lagacherie, P., Ciampalini, R., & Saby, N.P.A. (2017). Prediction of topsoil texture for Region Centre (France) applying model ensemble methods. Geoderma,  298, 67–77.
Ge, Y., Thomasson, J.A., & Sui, R. (2011). Regression-kriging for characterizing soils with remote sensing data. Front Earth Science, 5(3), 239–244.
Gee, G.W., & Bauder, J.W. (1986). Particle-size Analysis. Pp. 383–411, In: Klute, A.(ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy Monograph 9 (2ed). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Gozdowski, D., Stępień, M., Samborski, S., Dobers, E.S., Szatyłowicz, J., & Chormański, J. (2015). Prediction accuracy of selected spatial interpolation methods for soil texture at farm field scale. Soil Science Plant Nutrient, 15(3), 639–650.
Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G.B., Kempen, B., Leenaars, J.G., Walsh, M.G., Shepherd, K.D., Sila, A., MacMillan, R.A., de Jesus, J.M., Tamene, L., & Tondoh, J.E. (2015). Mapping soil properties of Africa at 250m resolution: random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS One, 10, 1–26.
Jeihouni, M., Alavipanah, S., Toomanian, A., & Jafarzadeh, A. (2020). Soil texture fractions modeling and mapping using LS-SVR algorithm. Desert, 25, 147-154.
Kavianpoor, H., Ouri, A.E., Jeloudar, Z.J., & Kavian, A. (2012). Spatial variability of some chemical and physical soil properties in Nesho Mountainous Rangelands. American Journal Environ Engineering, 2, 34-44.
Khan, S.R., Abbas, M.K. & Hussan, A.U. (2012). Effect of induced soil compaction on changes in soil properties and wheat productivity under sandy loam and sandy clay loam soils: A greenhouse experiment. Communications in Soil. Science and Plant Analysis, 43 (19), 2550–63.
Kettler, T.A., Doran, J.W., & Gilbert, T.L. (2001). Simplified method for soil particle-size determination to accompany soil-quality analyses. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 849–852.
Khaledian, Y., & Miller, B.A. (2020). Selecting appropriate machine learning methods for digital soil mapping. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 81, 401–418.
Khosravi Aqdam, K., Miran, N., Mohammadi Khajelou, Y., Khosravi Aqdam, M., Asadzadeh, F., & Mosleh, Z. (2021). Predicting the spatial distribution of soil mineral particles using OLI sensor in northwest of Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193, 1-13.
Liao, K., Xu, S., Wu, J., & Zhu, Q. (2013). Spatial estimation of surface soil texture using remote sensing data. Soil Science Plant Nutrient, 59(4), 488–500.
Luo, C., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Men, Z., Liu, H., (2022). Regional soil organic matter mapping models based on the optimal time window, feature selection algorithm and Google Earth Engine. Soil and Tillage Research, 219, 105-325.
Lopez-Granados, F., Jurado-Exposito, M., Pena-Barragan, J.M., & Garcia-Torres, L., (2005). Using geostatistical and remote sensing approaches for mapping soil proper­ties. European  Journal of Agronomy, 23, 279–289.
McBratney, A.B., Mendonça Santos, M.L., & Minasny, B. (2003). On digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 117, 3–52.
Mitran, T., Solanky, V., Suresh, G.J., Sujatha, G., Sreenivas, K., & Ravisankar, T. (2019). Predictive mapping of surface soil texture in a semiarid region of India through geostatistical modeling. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 5, 645-657.
Mikhailova, E.A., Post, C.J., Schlautman, J.M., Galbraith, M.A., & Zurqani, H.A. (2018). Usability of soil survey soil texture data for soil health indicator scoring. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 49 (15), 1826–34.
Metternicht, G.I., & Zinck, J.A. (2003). Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints. Remote Semsing Environmental. 85, 1–20.
Parviz, L. (2017). Evaluation the Preprocessing Effect of Satellite Images Input Parameters in to Artificial Neural Network for Soil Texture Determination. Applied Soil Research, 5(2), 66-80 (in Persian).
Pordel, F., Ebrahimi, A., & Azizi, Z. (2018). Canopy cover or remotely sensed vegetation index, explanatory variables of above-ground biomass in an arid rangeland, Iran. Journal of Arid Land, 11 (2), 166-178 (in Persian).
Pereira, P., Brevik, E.C., Oliva, M., Estebaranz, F., Depellegrin, D., Novara, A., Cerdà, A., & Menshov, O. (2017). Goal oriented soil mapping: applying modern methods supported by local knowledge. Pp. 61-83, In: Soil Mapping and Process Modeling for Sustainable Land Use Management. Elsevier.
Santra, P., Kumar, M., & Panwar, N. (2017). Digital soil mapping of sand content in arid western India through geostatistical approaches. Geoderma Regional, 9, 56–72.
Souza Junior, J.G., Demattê, J.A., & Araújo, S.R. (2011). Modelos espectrais terrestres orbitais na determinação de teores de atributos dos solos: potencial e custos. Bragantia, 70, 610–621
Sullivan, D.G., Shaw, J., & Rickman, D. (2005). IKONOS imagery to estimate surface soil property variability in two Alabama physiographies. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69(6), 1789-1798.
Shahriari, M., Delbari, M., Afrasiab, P., & Pahlavan-Rad, M.R. (2019). Predicting regional spatial distribution of soil texture in floodplains using remote sensing data: A case of southeastern Iran. Catena, 182, 104-149.
Swain, S.R., Chakraborty, P., Panigrahi, N., Vasava, H.B., Reddy, N.N., Roy, S., Majeed, I., Das, B.S. (2021). Estimation of soil texture using Sentinel-2 multispectral imaging data: An ensemble modeling approach. Soil and Tillage Research, 213, 105-134.
Sadeghi, A. (2006). Statistical Analysis, SPSS 14. University Jahad Publications, Tehran (In Persian).
Tahmasebi, P., Ebrahimi, A., & Yarali, N.A. (2012). The Most Appropirate Quadrate Size and Shape for Determing Some Characteristics of a Semi-steppic Rangeland. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 65, 203-216.
Van Capelle, C., Schrader, S., & Brunotte, J. (2012). Tillage-induced changes in the functional diversity of soil biota - A review with a focus on German data. European Journal of Soil Biology, 50, 165–181.
Wetterlind, J., & Stenberg, B. (2010). Near‐infrared spectroscopy for within‐field soil characterization: small local calibrations compared with national libraries spiked with local samples. European Journal of Soil Science, 61(6), 823-843.
Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Huang, C. (2009). Spatial variability of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus under different land uses in a small watershed on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma, 150, 141–149.
Xiao, J., Shen, Y., Tateishi, R., & Bayaer, W. (2006). Development of topsoil grain size index for monitoring desertification in arid land using remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 27(12), 2411–2422.
Yang, R.M., Zhang, G.L., Liu, F., Lu, Y.Y., Yang, F., Yang, F., Yang, M., Zhao, Y.G., & Li, D.C. (2016). Comparison of boosted regression tree and random forest models for mapping topsoil organic carbon concentration in an alpine ecosystem. Ecological Indices, 60, 870–878.
Water and Soil Management and Modelling
Volume 2, Issue 3
September 2022
Pages 66-78

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 February 2022
  • Revise Date: 26 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 02 March 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics