Appropriate urban infrastructure management strategies against floods from the perspective of passive defense using SWOT and QSPM (Case study: Kashan City)

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student/ Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

2 Professor,/Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor/ Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Due to urban development, it is necessary to provide management solutions to reduce the risk of flooding of urban facilities. Passive defense is a new approach aimed at minimizing and preventing financial and human losses and preventing potential crises based on the civilian methods. Among the various models proposed for strategic planning, the SWOT matrix is the most common. The main purpose of this study is to provide the best management strategies to reduce the risk of existing facilities and also to provide strategies for facilities that will be constructed in the future.
Materials and Methods
The infrastructure map of Kashan City (urban land use) was prepared via Kashan Municipality. Then, the infrastructures (applications) were divided into 14 general categories. In the next step, by carefully examining the area and field visit and examining each infrastructure, a list of internal factors (strengths, weaknesses) and external factors (opportunities and threats) was prepared and the final score of the weight multiplied by the rank for internal and external factors. Achieved and strategic position for the region was identified and management strategies for the region were developed. Finally, the developed strategies were prioritized using the Quantitative Planning Matrix (QSPM).
Results and Discussion
The final score of internal and external factors was equal to 1.931 and 2.03, respectively, which indicates the predominance of weaknesses in internal factors and the majority of threats in external factors. The strategic position for the study area is recognized as the defensive strategy (WT) type. three strategies include: 1- providing the necessary budget for strengthening urban infrastructure with a passive defense approach against floods and anti-flood action of urban facilities, 2- interacting with scientific centers for studies in the context of floods and the damages caused by it, and 3- principled constructions with the focus on sustainable development and passive defense were developed. The results showed that the strategy No. 3 with a final attractiveness score of 6.51 is the first management priority for urban infrastructure. The strategies 1 and 2 with the final attractiveness score of 4.59 and 4.15 are proposed as the next managerial priorities for the region.
Conclusion
According to the score of internal and external factors, the strategic position was obtained as defensive type. Passive defence tries to neutralize the weaknesses and threats in the region by relying on the strengths of internal factors and the opportunity of external factors. According to the result of the Quantitative Planning Matrix (QSPM), construction with a focus on sustainable development and passive defense with respect to the river area was selected as the initial strategy for the region.

Keywords

References

Adeli, Z., beyg babaye, B., Egbali N,. & Hatami, A. (2016). The evaluation of structure of Bonab city deploying SWOT Technique in line with passive defense factors planning. Quarterly Journal of Environmental-based Territorial Planning, 9(32), 151-167 (in Persian).
Afsharinia, M., & Panahi, F. (2021). Effect of climatic drought on surface soil salinity in Kashan Plain. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 1(2), 40-52 (in Persian).
Aslani, F. (2017). Strategic Planning by SWOT Technique to deal with flooding, Case study: the central area of Tehran & Karaj townships. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 7(3), 201-210 (in Persian).
Aynalem, S.B. (2020). Floodplain mapping and hazard assessment of Muga River by using ArcGIS and HEC-RAS model Upper Blue Nile Ethiopia. Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, 5(4), 74.
Banihabib, M.E., Ezzati Amini, M., & Shabestari, M.H. (2017). Using a hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making model for the strategic restoration of a seasonal-urban river. Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 4(4), 1105-1116 (in Persian).
Brandon, P.S. (2011). Extreme management in disaster recovery. Procedia Engineering, 14, 84-94.
Davoudi, S.M., & Ghazavi, R. (2020). Determination of appropriate management strategies for Natanz urban watershed using SWOT matrix. Hydrogeomorphology, 7(22), 105-226 (in Persian).
Ghazavi, R. (2019). Watershed Management-Strategic Management. Publication of university of kashan (in Persian).
Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: it is time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46-52.
Minnaar, A. (2002). The implementation and impact of crime prevention/crime control open street closed-circuit television surveillance in South African central business districts. Surveillance and Society, 4, 174-207.
Moayeri, M., & Entezari, M. (2008). Floods and reviow floods in province of Esfahan. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 3(6), 110-124 (in Persian).
Rahnama, M.R., & Hosseini, S.M. (2017). Crisis management in urban distressed techniques using SWOT and QSPM (Case study: the regional four of Mashhad). Journal of Emergency Management, 5(10), 51-64 (in Persian).
Razpour, M., Araghizadeh, M., & Alalhesabi, M. (2019). The pattern of defining the indicators of civil defense for reducing urban vulnerability Case study of Sanandaj City. Journal of Emergency Management, 7(14), 137-153 (in Persian).
Riyahipur, M., Kalantari, M., & Piri, E. (2020). Crisis Management and planning in urban water supply facilities using passive defense approach (Case study: Yasouj City). Journal of Water and Wastewater, 31(2), 130-136 (in Persian).
Sadeghloo, T., & Sojasi Qeidari, H. (2015). Flood hazard management strategies in rural area by SWOC-TOPSIS technique (Case study: Ghare – chai river basin of Ramyan province). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12, 105-128 (in Persian).
Taghvaei, M., & Soleimani, F. (2011). Urban crisis management with emphasis on flood. Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 20(79), 66-73 (in Persian).
Tsai, M.N., Liao, Y.F., Chang, Y.L., & Chen, H.C. (2020). A brainstorming flipped classroom approach for improving students’ learning performance, motivation, teacher-student interaction and creativity in a civics education class. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38 (100747), 1-25.
Yadollahi, P., Hassani, N., Jafari, H.R., Zahrabi, B., & Motazavi, A.A. (2020). Management strategies for reduce the consequences of flood hazard with the SWOT analytical method (Case study: Hamedan-Bahar Plain). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 11(22), 188-198 (in Persian).
Yazdani, M.H., & Seydin, A. (2017). Assessment the vulnerability of infrastructures in Ardabil City nin terms of passive defense. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 17(44), 179-199 (in Persian).
Ziyyari, K.A., Ebrahimipoor, M., Pourjafar, M.R., & Salehi, E. (2020). Explaining strategies for increasing physical resilience against flood Case study: Cheshmeh Kile River, Tonekabon River. Sustainable City, 3(1), 89-105 (in Persian).
Water and Soil Management and Modelling
Volume 2, Issue 1
March 2022
Pages 42-52

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 23 October 2021
  • Accept Date: 25 October 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics