Challenges and strategies towards combating dust storm in Sistan based on the institutional stakeholders viewpoint

Document Type : Research/Original/Regular Article

Authors

1 Research Assistant Professor/ Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran

2 Research Instructor/ Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran

3 Former Ph.D. student/ Department of Arid Zone Management, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

4 Research Assistant Professor/ Zabol Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Zabol, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Sustainable land management is defined as as “the use of land resources, including soils, water, animals and plants, for the production of goods to meet changing human needs, while simultaneously ensuring the long-term productive potential of these resources and the maintenance of their environmental function”. Undoubtedly, achieving comprehensive land management requires effective and coordinated communication, cooperation and synergy of all key stakeholders and stakeholders who have common goals but distinct tasks. The aim of this study is to investigate challenges and strategies for managing and combating dust storm using participatory appraisal among Sistan Institutional Stakeholders Network.
Materials and Methods
The aim of this research is participatory appraisal of challenges and strategies for managing, controlling and combating the dust phenomenon among 27 invited relevant key institutional stakeholders of Sistan network. Comprehensive studies of Sistan dust conducted by the Research Institution of Forest and Rangeland, and the considered challenges and strategies for managing, controlling and combating dust storm was assessed using a brainstorming technique in a collaborative way. So, the participants have been divided into 5 working groups, including Water-Agriculture, Economics-Development-Infrastructure, Environment-Natural Resources, Cultural-Social-Political, and Law-Policy Making. The challenges and solutions have been investigated.
Results and Discussion
some challenges stated by the groups are: limitation of water resources, depletion of groundwater table and the lack of optimal decision-making regarding the management of watersheds in western Sistan, the destruction of vegetation in northwestern Sistan, the lack of organizational cohesion and integrated attitude by land management authorities, the lack of communication between research and implementation, migration, insecurity due to the depopulation of villages, increasing poverty and unemployment, weak Iranian diplomacy regarding the Hamoon Wetland, strong dependence of the Sistan region on water resources and agricultural economy, lack of integrated management regarding the maintenance of wetlands. The presented solutions are: determining the extent of urban development based on the volume of available water, modifying the pattern of drinking water consumption, predicting the use of treated municipal effluents to control fine source of dust, the optimal use of precipitation to stabilize eroded areas, improve the Sistan river pathways, forming the Sistan Dust Working Group, evaluating the effectiveness of executive projects on watershed management, and education in schools.
Conclusion
In general, the challenges raised by various institutions indicate a weakness in comprehensive planning, integrated management and good governance based on community-based participatory management.

Keywords

References

Afsharinia, M., & Vali, A. (2021). Survey of the effectiveness of desert management plans on the inhabitants of the desert ecosystem (Case study: Kashan). Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 1(1), 40-50 (in Persian).
Anonymous, (2020). Economic and social studies, sistan dust comprehensive project. Final report of a project, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 242 pages (in Persian).
Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2000). Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience, Cambridge University Press.
Darvand, S., Eskandari Damaneh, H., Eskandari Damaneh, H., & Khosravi, H. (2021). Prediction of the change trend of temperature and rainfall in the future period and its impact on desertification. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 1(1), 51-64 (in Persian).
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P.C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907-1912.
Dumanski, J., Terry, E., Byerlee, D., & Pieri, C. (1998). Performance indicators for sustainable agriculture (Discussion Note). Policies of the World Bank, 1-17.
Ernstson, H., Sörlin, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2008). Social movements and ecosystem services–the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 39.
Ghanbari, R., Nemati, Z., & Borzoi, A. (2014). Methods of applying water resources management in agriculture (challenges and solutions), Second National Conference on Planning, Conservation, Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
Ghazvini, M., Veisi, H., Mahdavi Damghani, A., Khoshbakht, K., Liaghati, H., Nejatian, M.A., & Dekamin, M. (2013). Sustainable land management, an approach to overcome the environmental challenges of agriculture. Environment and Development Journal, 4(8), 23-30 (in Persian).
Ghorbani, M. (2014). National social network analysis project; modeling, policy making and implementation of participatory management of natural resources (First phase). Final report of a national project, University of Tehran (in Persian).
Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C., & Light, S.S. (1995). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions, Columbia University Press.
Hafeznia, M.R., Taheri, A., Farajzadeh Asl, M., & Karaminezhad, H. (2017). The effects of political factors on intensification of dust storms in the Euphrates–Tigris River Basin. Human Geography Research, 49(4), 857-868 (in Persian).
Holling, C.S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation biology, 10(2), 328-337.
Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23.
Jafarian, V. (2016). Analysis of the network of organizational stakeholders in policy making and integrated management of water resources in Garmsar plain. Ph.D Thesis, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran (in Persian).
Mohebbi, A. (2019). Preliminary study of rangeland management within the combat dust project in south- east of Ahwaz. Iran Nature, 3(6), 70-75 (in Persian).
Naderi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Yavari, A. (2014). Analysis of information exchange network and key actors in policy making and sustainable management of Sorkheh Hesar National Park. Researches in Earth Sciences, 5(4), 16-28 (in Persian).
Perez, L., Rappa, R., & Künzli, N. (2010). The year of the lung: outdoor air pollution and lung health. Swiss Medical Weekly, 140, w13129.
Rasekhi, S. (2014). Social network analysis in range management and participatory management planning (Case study: Fars Province). Ph.D. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
Salari, F. (2014). Modeling and analysis of water resources management network in the watershed (Case study: Kermanshah resin watershed). M.Sc. Thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
Sedigh, M., Johari, M., & Kazeruni, S.M. (2018). The phenomenon of dust in Iran and how to manage them from the perspective of international law. Azad Law Research Quarterly, 11(39), 87-114 (in Persian).
Smyth, A.J., & Dumanski, J. (1993). FESLM: An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management. World Soil Resources Report, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 85 pages.
Water and Soil Management and Modelling
Volume 1, Issue 4
December 2021
Pages 48-56

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 13 September 2021
  • Accept Date: 16 September 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics